The current state of western leftism is basically indistinguishable from the couple years when the Nazi-Soviet Alliance was in effect. But somehow dumber actually because at least back in the day the USSR had a far-left ideology, unlike today’s Russia which is a dystopian crony capitalist hellhole.

I suspect he will be targeted by hardliners.

Love to hear Europeans explain their racist theories. It's charming in a creepy way.

That is because a lot of GenXers and GenZers have a very little knowledge of history and what is happening in the world. That is the state of education in USA.
Some even claim 9/11 happened under Obama and have no knowledge of the Dotcom crash of 2002.

They should just wait for their usual Republican sources to tell them what to say.

They would have called him that. I told genocide Joe fakers that if US Jews could have supported FDR after his state department stranded millions of desperate refugees in Hitlerland and Japanese-Americans and Black Americans volunteered for the Army, they could suck it up &look at the alternatives.

All the allies signed off at Potsdam. www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
Was the exile of French Pied-noirs a genocide?
How about the vast and super violent displacement of people in India/Pakistan division?

Oh yeah, not necessarily forced. Just a polite conversation with the Red Army and NKVD.

I don't think removing the settlements would be ethnic cleansing either. Why are you so determined to misrepresent me as a Likud supporter?

God forbid I should disagree with the Kleptocracy in South Africa or with the Taliban.
My bad.

But it doesn't say that -otherwise you'd be able to quote it, which you cannot. You know why? Because many of the most powerful drafters of that agreement were involved in ethnic displacement directly or via allies at the time. Large parts of Poland were German before 1930 etc.

I called for sanctioning donors to settler organizations as well as to far right Israeli media and parties. I still call for it, but of course under Trump, thanks in some part to the Abandon Harris "supporters of Palestine", it won't happen.

Your interpretation is not what it actually says.

Why is it you insist that I should call actions that I have condemned by some label? What's the significance? For most of your movement, the significance is calling Israel genocidal is a justification for calls to exterminate Israelis, nothing more

Snore. It doesn't say that in the Convention. Your "accepted interpretation" is not one. Your insistence that dead people are the same as alive refugees is grossly immoral.

My answer is the same: things can be criminal and immoral without being genocide and I don't need a political commissar.

That's a tendentious interpretation. That actual wording is clearly different.

Blood and soil is not an official UN doctrine.

And you're not satisfied with my agreement that the settlements are criminal and wrong and should be removed because the wording is apparently what you care about.

No you didn't. And your psychological analysis is general European colonialist pseudo-objectivity.

It's easy to read the convention online. It very carefully does not say what you claim.

I

Your whole argument relies on pretending I didn't write what I wrote about Likud's West Bank policy. Well that and being wrong about what the genocide convention says. And, ignoring the genocidal intent of many of your fellow "anti-genocide" campaigners.

No it does not say that.

And I don't need your bullshit explanation of what I should feel about my family history or your continued refusal to admit that I oppose Likud very much.

www.un.org/en/genocidep...