Expertise: stats, voting methods
Interests: US & Guatemalan politics, causal inference, dark matter, sf, democracy, a"i"/ml, cancer, -omics, linguistics, justice, people geeking the fuck out
Here's a rubric for criticizing Democrats:
1. Also criticize Republicans (unlike worthless "centrists" like Hamid).
2. Allow for gradations and improvement (unlike worthless primarily-anti-Dem "leftists").
Here's a rubric for criticizing Democrats:
1. Also criticize Republicans (unlike worthless "centrists" like Hamid).
2. Allow for gradations and improvement (unlike worthless primarily-anti-Dem "leftists").
It was close enough to hear, stop, and see despite having headphones on listening to a podcast!
It was close enough to hear, stop, and see despite having headphones on listening to a podcast!
Is there a word for this guy's cowardly cocktail of white supremacy and transphobia? Yes. 4 letters, goes with a swastika.
Is there a word for this guy's cowardly cocktail of white supremacy and transphobia? Yes. 4 letters, goes with a swastika.
Only 3 wires so I think the implied frequency of the cheapass power supply is 300K Hz!!!
Only 3 wires so I think the implied frequency of the cheapass power supply is 300K Hz!!!
"No, THIS one should."
"No, THIS one should."
No, it's not settled. And if you think it is, you're not listening.
/end
No, it's not settled. And if you think it is, you're not listening.
/end
It's not just "screenshots with commentary". It's that:
1. he does so in a way that demonstrably encourages abuse.
2. When that's pointed out, he basically cheers it on. ("Thanks, Kiwi Farmer!")
3. He screenshots people WHO HAVE BLOCKED HIM!
It's not just "screenshots with commentary". It's that:
1. he does so in a way that demonstrably encourages abuse.
2. When that's pointed out, he basically cheers it on. ("Thanks, Kiwi Farmer!")
3. He screenshots people WHO HAVE BLOCKED HIM!
Yes, for everyday moderation decisions, everything needs to be within Bluesky, otherwise it's not scalable or verifiable.
This is, obviously, not an everyday situation. And that predictably happens in T&S! So don't pretend it is.
Yes, for everyday moderation decisions, everything needs to be within Bluesky, otherwise it's not scalable or verifiable.
This is, obviously, not an everyday situation. And that predictably happens in T&S! So don't pretend it is.
Thus, this LGM post illustrates the very problem it decries.
Thus, this LGM post illustrates the very problem it decries.
Good: the main characters (Elphaba and G[a]linda); quality and overall commitment of the production.
Weaker: 2ary characters (even Glinda at times) exactly as shallow as the plot needs at the moment.
Walked home past an old railway bridge. Didn't defy gravity.
Good: the main characters (Elphaba and G[a]linda); quality and overall commitment of the production.
Weaker: 2ary characters (even Glinda at times) exactly as shallow as the plot needs at the moment.
Walked home past an old railway bridge. Didn't defy gravity.