Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Katie Bergh @katiebergh.bsky.social · Jul 1

With a huge unfunded mandate for #SNAP food benefits one step closer to becoming law, don't lose sight of the painful tradeoffs states will be facing: Do they raise taxes? Cut state funding for other vital services? Slash the number of eligible low-income people receiving food assistance?

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

States still stand to lose big under the now-passed Senate R reconciliation plan, w/ major new costs forcing likely cuts to health care, food benefits, & other S&L priorities. Just the #SNAP cost-shift alone will force painful choices. At the 15% maximum state rate, for ex⬇️

Sharon Parrott @sharonparrott.bsky.social · Jul 1

Senate Rs voted to pass a bill that wld raise food & health care costs on families, increase hunger & take health coverage away from millions of ppl while doubling down on tax cuts for the wealthy. House Rs must stand up for their communities & reject it. www.cbpp.org/press/statem...

9 14

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

And for more details on how both Senate & House Republican plans would further shift costs & force hard choices in states generally, we’ve got you here: www.cbpp.org/blog/trackin...

States Would Face New Costs, Likely Enact Harmful Cuts Under Senate Reconciliation Plan | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Like its House counterpart, the Senate Republican leaders’ reconciliation plan would shift...

www.cbpp.org

2

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

These are just a few examples, but they’re not unique: under the Republican reconciliation plan, *all* states will face serious new costs & painful tradeoffs. More state-specific SNAP cost-shift examples are available here: www.cbpp.org/research/foo...

Research Note: Senate Republican Leaders’ Proposal Risks Deep Cuts to Food Assistance, Some States Ending SNAP Entirely | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

States, which must balance their budgets every year, would struggle to absorb these substantial new costs.

www.cbpp.org

1 1 2

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

And #NewYork’s annual #SNAP benefits’ bill could swell to nearly $1.1 billion, or about 3X annual state spending on the Department of Environmental Conservation, which protects the state's natural resources and prevents and abates water and air pollution.

1 1

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

#NewJersey could be on the hook for an estimated $287M, or nearly their annual state spending on county colleges, which serve more than 168,000 students.

1 1

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

#Colorado, meanwhile, could owe about $194M, equal to two-thirds their Department of Public Safety’s annual budget, which funds the state highway patrol, Bureau of Investigation, and fire prevention and code enforcement.

1 1

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

In #California, annual #SNAP benefit costs could surpass $1.8 billion, roughly equal to state spending on the Department of Public Health, whose responsibilities include health emergency response, food safety, & infectious disease control.

1 1 1

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

#Arizona would owe about $300M, or close to their yearly state spending on their Department of Forestry and Fire Management and the Department of Public Safety combined.

1 1 1

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jul 1

States still stand to lose big under the now-passed Senate R reconciliation plan, w/ major new costs forcing likely cuts to health care, food benefits, & other S&L priorities. Just the #SNAP cost-shift alone will force painful choices. At the 15% maximum state rate, for ex⬇️

Sharon Parrott @sharonparrott.bsky.social · Jul 1

Senate Rs voted to pass a bill that wld raise food & health care costs on families, increase hunger & take health coverage away from millions of ppl while doubling down on tax cuts for the wealthy. House Rs must stand up for their communities & reject it. www.cbpp.org/press/statem...

House Should Reject Senate Republican Bill That Is Even Worse Than Already Harmful House Version in Important Ways | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Following a series of middle-of-the-night backroom deals, and less than an hour after the final language was unveiled, Senate Republicans voted to pass a bill that would raise food and health care cos...

www.cbpp.org

1 10 15

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Katie Bergh @katiebergh.bsky.social · Jun 30

Based on new USDA data released today, 44 states would have to pay tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars under Senate Republicans' #SNAP cost-shift plan. If a state can't fully pay, they would have to cut many low-income families off SNAP or end their program altogether.

1 12 16

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 28

It shocks the conscience.

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities @centeronbudget.bsky.social · Jun 28

"It shocks the conscience that Senate Republican leaders saw the impacts of the House bill — 16 million more people uninsured and millions losing help buying groceries, including families with children — and chose to double down." -
@sharonparrott.bsky.social www.cbpp.org/press/statem...

9 13

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities @centeronbudget.bsky.social · Jun 28

The truth is clear — the Senate Republican reconciliation bill will hurt people in every state if enacted. Senators who vote for it are responsible for its impact ⬇️

1 15 10

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Katie Bergh @katiebergh.bsky.social · Jun 27

"We fear that if this bill passes, a village in rural Alaska might lose its one-and-only grocery store because of a drastic decline in SNAP dollars. It might also lose its sole health care clinic or hospital because it cannot sustain its services with decreased Medicaid reimbursements."

New York Times Opinion @nytopinion.nytimes.com · Jun 27

“The likely impacts from the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ are particularly ugly for our home state, Alaska,” write Bryce Edgmon and Cathy Giessel, two state lawmakers. “The bill being rushed through Congress is based on a one-size-fits-all approach that does not reflect these realities on the ground.”

Opinion | The Big Beautiful Bill Will Be Ugly for Alaska

Congress’s one-size-fits-all bill doesn’t take into account the realities of life in Alaska.

www.nytimes.com

48 170 490

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Joanna LeFebvre @joannalefebvre.bsky.social · Jun 26

The national school voucher proposal in the Senate GOP reconciliation plan would threaten students’ access to quality public schools, give tax breaks to the wealthy, & override states that have rejected these harmful policies. Lawmakers who care about our kids’ futures should reject it.

2 23 23

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 25

Senate & House Rs are rushing a massive reconciliation plan that promises widespread harm to people & communities in *every state*, partly thru shifting major costs states simply can't afford. Fresh out from us today is more state-by-state context on the potential pinch. www.cbpp.org/research/sta...

Roundup: State Budgets Increasingly Strained as House, Senate Republican Plans Would Impose Major Costs | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Senate and House Republican leaders are advancing a massive tax and budget package — a process technically known as reconciliation — that features extreme cuts to food assistance and health care...

www.cbpp.org

6 6

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Ty Jones Cox @tyjonescox.bsky.social · Jun 24

There is confusion about whether the Parliamentarian has indicated that a slightly revised version of the #SNAP cost-shift to states in the Senate Republican bill complies with the Byrd rule. But what’s clear is: the provision’s harmful impact is unchanged.

1 16 18

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Allison Orris @aorris.bsky.social · Jun 23

This suggests that Republicans may add yet another deeply harmful health care cut to the Senate bill – a cut that would take health coverage away from even more people, shift massive, unaffordable costs to states, & could even lead some states to end their #Medicaid expansion.

Daniel Payne @danielpayne.bsky.social · Jun 23

Scoop: Senate Republicans are considering a new provision that would further cut Medicaid funding in the OBBB

www.statnews.com/2025/06/23/g...

Senate Republicans discuss new way to cut Medicaid in Trump’s tax bill

The proposal would sharply limit federal spending on the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion.

www.statnews.com

3 36 31

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Allison Orris @aorris.bsky.social · Jun 20

The Senate Republican leadership’s reconciliation proposal would take health coverage away from millions of people and dramatically raise health care costs for millions more. Here's our recap, including an overview of the damaging #Medicaid cuts: www.cbpp.org/research/hea...

By the Numbers: Senate Republican Leadership’s Health Agenda Takes Health Coverage Away From Millions of People and Raises Families’ Costs | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

The Senate Republican leadership’s reconciliation proposal would take health coverage away from millions of people and dramatically raise health care costs for millions more.

www.cbpp.org

2 2 1

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Sharon Parrott @sharonparrott.bsky.social · Jun 17

It shocks the conscience that Senate Republican leaders saw the impacts of the House bill — 16 million more people uninsured and millions losing help buying groceries, including families with children — and chose to double down.

1 10 24

Reposted by Wesley Tharpe

Katie Bergh @katiebergh.bsky.social · Jun 3

Questions to ask about the House R plan:
Is my state raising taxes to make up for these huge federal cuts?
Is my state cutting other services (schools, child care, etc.) to fill that funding gap?
If my state can't make up the federal cuts, whose food assistance or health care is getting taken away?

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 3

Tldr: the enormous cuts passed by House Republicans, which not-for-nothing coincide with massive new tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans, would force states to pick up billions in new costs & make a series of excruciating tradeoffs. It’s a bad deal the Senate should reject.

5 10

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 3

For the full details, here’s the new (@centeronbudget.bsky.social‬) report from me, @katiebergh.bsky.social & @aorris.bsky.social: www.cbpp.org/research/sta...

House Republican Reconciliation Bill Would Force States to Cut Food Assistance, Health Care, and Other Vital Services | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

The House Republican reconciliation bill features major cuts to food assistance and health care for millions of people, as reports have long indicated it would.The House Republican reconciliation...

www.cbpp.org

3 12

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 3

Tldr: the enormous cuts passed by House Republicans, which not-for-nothing coincide with massive new tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans, would force states to pick up billions in new costs & make a series of excruciating tradeoffs. It’s a bad deal the Senate should reject.

1 3 12

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 3

Public education would be at especially high risk, given that it makes up the largest share of state budgets. For context: just the potential cost of the proposed 5% minimum SNAP match is the equivalent of average salary costs for about 65K public school teachers nationwide.

1 3 12

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 3

That means states would almost surely impose significant spending cuts – *both* to health care & food assistance but also by shifting funds from other parts of the budget, such as schools, child care, housing, or infrastructure. bsky.app/profile/wesl...

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · May 13

B/c most states are unlikely to fully bridge the gap through new revenues, they’d have to cut health care & food assistance previously covered by the feds *or* cut funding for other state & local services like schools & roads. And probably both. www.cbpp.org/blog/shiftin...

Shifting Federal Costs for Food Assistance, Health Care, Other Priorities to States Would Cause Widespread Harm | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

House and Senate Republicans are working overtime to rush through a federal budget plan that would cut off large portions of federal funding for food assistance, health care, and other vital programs....

www.cbpp.org

1 4 16

Wesley Tharpe @wesleytharpe.bsky.social · Jun 3

Three: states are not in a position to absorb these major new cuts, either in good times or bad. For one, they have to balance their budgets. And also: their finances are already increasingly strained, a trend that would worsen if the economy tips further toward recession.

1 4 15