Giarc
banner
whichalteregoami.bsky.social
Giarc
@whichalteregoami.bsky.social
Bluesky is glorious compared to the propaganda machine Muskrat turned Twitter into.

I think I am far younger than that guy reflected back in the mirror.

Diehard fan of: Detroit Tigers, Michigan Wolverines, and San Francisco 49ers
Pinned
Reposted by Giarc
Amazing that neither Trump, nor any member of his cabinet, is facing impeachment proceedings right now. 🤷‍♀️

And to preempt: I don't care if it will fail — do it anyway.
And when it fails — do it again.
January 8, 2026 at 2:07 PM
Reposted by Giarc
Naming a police officer is not doxxing. We aren’t supposed to have secret police in America.
January 9, 2026 at 12:10 AM
Reposted by Giarc
“Emerson does not have a mother today because one of you murdered a woman in cold blood yesterday.”
January 8, 2026 at 4:16 PM
Reposted by Giarc
This is exactly what I told someone yesterday.

Even if I spot you the first shot (I shouldn’t, but let’s go with that), shots 2 and 3 were inexcusable and this officer will lose his case if it ever goes to court.
January 8, 2026 at 3:10 PM
Reposted by Giarc
BREAKING: ICE shooter identified as Jonathan Ross. www.startribune.com/ice-agent-wh...
Star Tribune identifies ICE agent who fatally shot woman in Minneapolis
Jonathan Ross was dragged in a separate incident last year by a fleeing driver, according to court records.
www.startribune.com
January 8, 2026 at 7:12 PM
Say goodbye to your family, friends and this administration because no one will want to be near a toxic guy like him.
No amount of begging for his life back will help this asshole now.
January 8, 2026 at 8:46 PM
Reposted by Giarc
November 19, 2025 at 10:08 PM
Reposted by Giarc
1/ THREAD: This year ICE has sent a record 600 immigrant kids into federal shelters, more than in the previous four years combined. Data suggests some are being separated from their families.

For one 15-year-old, it began with a cracked windshield 👇
November 25, 2025 at 2:01 AM
Reposted by Giarc
I need every single ice officers name in a registry, I need this shame to follow them eternally
January 7, 2026 at 6:44 PM
Reposted by Giarc
Remember everyone who is out there defending cold-blooded murder.

They’ve shown you exactly who they are.
January 8, 2026 at 4:13 PM
Reposted by Giarc
No lies detected.
January 8, 2026 at 6:07 PM
Reposted by Giarc
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” —George Orwell (1984)
January 8, 2026 at 3:32 PM
Reposted by Giarc
DOJ use of force policy.

He broke the law and murdered a US citizen. Full stop.
January 8, 2026 at 5:00 PM
Donald Trump and his personal Gestapo can go fuck themselves. Every last one of them are traitors to America.
And if you still support them, you are too.
January 8, 2026 at 4:56 PM
Reposted by Giarc
Google the video & see for yourself.

This is not law enforcement. This is murder.

Sickening.
😡😡😡😡
January 7, 2026 at 10:14 PM
If we had a functioning system of government, there would already be undercover people infiltrating ICE.
This group should be considered no different than the Mafia crime families of old.
January 8, 2026 at 4:54 PM
When Elon Musk lacky Big Balls was beaten by a mob in DC last August, Trump brought in the National Guard. He certainly did not defend the attackers. So why the difference now? #FuckTheTrumpRegime
January 7, 2026 at 10:17 PM
January 6, 2026 at 2:42 PM
Reposted by Giarc
It would be so cool if the United States Congress still existed.
January 4, 2026 at 5:04 AM
Reposted by Giarc
NEWS: A source confirms DOJ has NOT provided Congress the legally required explanation for redactions in the Epstein file releases, despite a Jan. 3 statutory deadline under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Department of Justice Violates Epstein Files Law By Failing to Inform Congress of Reasons Behind Redactions
The Justice Department has now blown through another deadline.
meidasnews.com
January 5, 2026 at 12:39 AM
Reposted by Giarc
DOJ is still in violation of the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
January 3, 2026 at 1:38 PM
January 3, 2026 at 10:55 PM
Reposted by Giarc
Indeed
January 3, 2026 at 5:18 PM
January 3, 2026 at 4:42 PM
Reposted by Giarc
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?

Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
December 31, 2025 at 9:04 PM