Ross Young
@writingrocks.bsky.social
780 followers 180 following 600 posts
The #WritingForPleasure Centre | Literacy Lab - University of Edinburgh | Real-World Writers | Science Of Teaching Primary Writing | How To Teach Writing | #WritingRocks Website: writing4pleasure.com PhD Profile: blogs.ed.ac.uk/literacylab/the-writing
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
writingrocks.bsky.social
That's so kind thank you very much. Hey @ellencounter.bsky.social 👆😍
Reposted by Ross Young
sabinelittle.bsky.social
Happy European Day of Languages! I'll be sharing posts throughout the day to celebrate, starting with the amazing collaboration with Twinkl for #Sheffield City of #Languages. Free resources for teachers and schools, celebrating multilingualism! www.twinkl.co.uk/l/iij38 @sheffielduni.bsky.social
Sheffield City of Languages Partnerships - - Twinkl
A collection of resources for teachers and schools to celebrate the Sheffield: City of Languages initiative.
www.twinkl.co.uk
writingrocks.bsky.social
Yes, this is a massive problem! The DfE’s Core Content Framework for ITE contains just one bullet point on the teaching of writing, and Ofsted’s Initial Teacher Education Inspection Framework, fails to mention writing at all (apart from checking secondary teachers’ handwriting).
writingrocks.bsky.social
I 100% believe it’s school and ITE related. Teachers tell me they never learnt about this stuff on their teacher training…
writingrocks.bsky.social
Agreed. We provided them with so much material on this but it wasn’t taken up… 🤷‍♂️
Reposted by Ross Young
damsoned.bsky.social
There are some strange myths around the teaching of writing floating around.

I wish the Writing Framework has just gone back to the utter basics (from research). Rather than create its own weird confections of misinterpretations.

bsky.app/profile/writ...
writingrocks.bsky.social
Hi Sue. Unfortunately, I hear it when working with schools sometimes - hence putting the article together.

Only this morning, I saw some colleagues on Facebook discussing 'no pencils until after Christmas' with the focus instead being put in motor skill activities.
writingrocks.bsky.social
AI assessment products undermine the personal expression, social and rhetorical view of writing, which emphasise context, purpose, and meaning-making/sharing.

An over-reliance on automated assessment products risk reducing writing to convention-following rather than authentic communication.
writingrocks.bsky.social
Instead of developing students’ thinking, voice, or audience awareness, instruction can become test-driven, focusing on the only things AI can reliably measure.
writingrocks.bsky.social
From this perspective, such AI systems:

Reinforce narrow definitions of good writing. Teachers may feel pressured to prioritise mechanical correctness and rigid formats over thinking, feeling and rhetorical effectiveness.
writingrocks.bsky.social
A formalist view treats writing primarily as the mastery of surface-level features (grammar, spelling, punctuation, adherence to structural conventions). Commercial AI writing assessment systems often excel at scoring these elements because they are rule-based and quantifiable.
writingrocks.bsky.social
Commercial providers with a formalist view of writing and its development love AI assessment because it compels schools and teachers to focus on the only things AI can reliably measure — adherence to conventions and transcriptional accuracy.
writingrocks.bsky.social
AI will never be able to assess what we value most about writing.

This is because AI doesn’t have the ability to think, feel or draw on human experience(s).
writingrocks.bsky.social
AI will never be able to assess what we value most about writing.

This is because AI doesn’t have the ability to think, feel or draw on human experience(s).