Yamil Ricardo Velez
@yamilrvelez.bsky.social
2.3K followers 1K following 88 posts
political scientist at Columbia | MIA ✈️ NYC | tailored surveys and experiments using generative AI
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
I used to believe that survey aesthetics have minimal effects on completion rates and attentiveness… until I saw that slime-green color scheme
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
dingdingpeng.the100.ci
Ever stared at a table of regression coefficients & wondered what you're doing with your life?

Very excited to share this gentle introduction to another way of making sense of statistical models (w @vincentab.bsky.social)
Preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf...
Website: j-rohrer.github.io/marginal-psy...
Models as Prediction Machines: How to Convert Confusing Coefficients into Clear Quantities

Abstract
Psychological researchers usually make sense of regression models by interpreting coefficient estimates directly. This works well enough for simple linear models, but is more challenging for more complex models with, for example, categorical variables, interactions, non-linearities, and hierarchical structures. Here, we introduce an alternative approach to making sense of statistical models. The central idea is to abstract away from the mechanics of estimation, and to treat models as “counterfactual prediction machines,” which are subsequently queried to estimate quantities and conduct tests that matter substantively. This workflow is model-agnostic; it can be applied in a consistent fashion to draw causal or descriptive inference from a wide range of models. We illustrate how to implement this workflow with the marginaleffects package, which supports over 100 different classes of models in R and Python, and present two worked examples. These examples show how the workflow can be applied across designs (e.g., observational study, randomized experiment) to answer different research questions (e.g., associations, causal effects, effect heterogeneity) while facing various challenges (e.g., controlling for confounders in a flexible manner, modelling ordinal outcomes, and interpreting non-linear models).
Figure illustrating model predictions. On the X-axis the predictor, annual gross income in Euro. On the Y-axis the outcome, predicted life satisfaction. A solid line marks the curve of predictions on which individual data points are marked as model-implied outcomes at incomes of interest. Comparing two such predictions gives us a comparison. We can also fit a tangent to the line of predictions, which illustrates the slope at any given point of the curve. A figure illustrating various ways to include age as a predictor in a model. On the x-axis age (predictor), on the y-axis the outcome (model-implied importance of friends, including confidence intervals).

Illustrated are 
1. age as a categorical predictor, resultings in the predictions bouncing around a lot with wide confidence intervals
2. age as a linear predictor, which forces a straight line through the data points that has a very tight confidence band and
3. age splines, which lies somewhere in between as it smoothly follows the data but has more uncertainty than the straight line.
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
ethanvporter.bsky.social
Today, @catiebailard.bsky.social and I take the reins at GW's Institute for Data, Democracy + Politics! We'll work to make IDDP a one-stop shop for research on misinfo, platform manipulation, and threats to democratic ideals. To follow our work + learn about opportunities, visit: bit.ly/45GLggi
Sign up
signup.e2ma.net
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
Agreed. Adding links has been my workaround, but that might assume an unrealistically high level of reviewer motivation.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
I had a blast presenting my work on tailored experiments and adaptive surveys at the Summer Institute of Computational Social Science. Nothing better than a room full of engaged and smart people getting into the weeds about algorithms, causal inference, and the messy realities of working with AI.
sicsspenn.bsky.social
@yamilrvelez.bsky.social from @columbiauniversity.bsky.social opened the second week of SICSS-Penn 2025 with his talk, "Generative AI and Respondent-Centered Social Science."
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
polanalysis.bsky.social
Currently in FirstView: In “Crowdsourced Adaptive Surveys,” @yamilrvelez.bsky.social introduces a methodology (CSAS) that converts open-ended text from participants into survey items and applies a multi-armed bandit algorithm to determine which questions should be prioritized in the survey.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
I played around with Gemma 3 27B for a few hours the other day and was impressed. There are lower quants that should run on your machine. Not sure how it performs with long context.
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
soubhikbarari.bsky.social
Another survey methods talk at 𝗡𝗬𝗔𝗔𝗣𝗢𝗥 coming up next week to put on your calendar:

Wed April 23 - 𝗚𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗔𝗜 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗦𝘂𝗿𝘃𝗲𝘆 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗰𝗵 (led by @yamilrvelez.bsky.social , @joshua-lerner.bsky.social , and myself)

RSVP below 👇
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
patrickpliu.bsky.social
🧵 Why do facts often change beliefs but not attitudes?

In a new WP with @yamilrvelez.bsky.social and @scottclifford.bsky.social, we caution against interpreting this as rigidity or motivated reasoning. Often, the beliefs *relevant* to people’s attitudes are not what researchers expect.
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
tomcostello.bsky.social
New paper!

AI lets us query humanity’s collective knowledge (or a subset of it) – rapidly addressing any given concern about vaccines in detail.

So can information-focused LLM conversations shift vaccination intentions? In an RCT of 1,124 HPV vax-hesitant parents: yes!
dgrand.bsky.social
🚨New AI-dialogue WP on vax hesitancy🚨
A conversation with our LLM was >2x more effective than standard CDC messaging for increasing hesitant parents' intent to vax kids against HPV
Many diff reasons for hesitancy = need for tailored responses
PDF: osf.io/preprints/ps...
Bot: healthinfobot.com/hpv
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
scottclifford.bsky.social
New working paper with two great coauthors!
patrickpliu.bsky.social
🧵 Why do facts often change beliefs but not attitudes?

In a new WP with @yamilrvelez.bsky.social and @scottclifford.bsky.social, we caution against interpreting this as rigidity or motivated reasoning. Often, the beliefs *relevant* to people’s attitudes are not what researchers expect.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
While there is a growing body of work suggesting information can change beliefs, effects on attitudes tend to be muted. We sketch out why this might be the case, drawing attention to the role of belief relevance. See 🧵 below!
patrickpliu.bsky.social
🧵 Why do facts often change beliefs but not attitudes?

In a new WP with @yamilrvelez.bsky.social and @scottclifford.bsky.social, we caution against interpreting this as rigidity or motivated reasoning. Often, the beliefs *relevant* to people’s attitudes are not what researchers expect.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
By bridging the gap between researchers and participants, CSAS could ultimately lead to a better understanding of public opinion.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
The method complements traditional surveys. Researchers can dedicate a few slots to CSAS questions while keeping their tried-and-true items. It allows for an exploratory approach to questionnaire construction.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
Key innovation: Instead of relying solely on expert-designed questions, CSAS lets participants shape the survey. I apply CSAS to topics such as issue salience, political beliefs, and local politics, finding that the method surfaces survey items that would likely elude experts.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
Here's how it works: Participants submit responses to open-ended questions that are converted by LLMs into structured survey items. Adaptive algorithms then optimize which participant-generated questions get shown to future participants.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
In this paper, I develop a method called the crowdsourced adaptive survey (CSAS) that allows surveys to evolve with participant input.
yamilrvelez.bsky.social
🧵 Knowing which questions to ask is one of the most critical aspects of survey design, but we often rely on guesswork to devise questionnaires. What if we were to rely directly on participants?
cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
#OpenAccess from @polanalysis.bsky.social -

Crowdsourced Adaptive Surveys - cup.org/4aY2OH4

- @yamilrvelez.bsky.social

"This paper introduces a crowdsourced adaptive survey methodology (CSAS) that unites advances in natural language processing and adaptive algorithms..."

#FirstView
The image features the text "POLITICAL ANALYSIS" in large white letters on a crimson background, with "#OpenAccess" in smaller white letters above a yellow bar below.
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
cambup-polsci.cambridge.org
#OpenAccess from @polanalysis.bsky.social -

Crowdsourced Adaptive Surveys - cup.org/4aY2OH4

- @yamilrvelez.bsky.social

"This paper introduces a crowdsourced adaptive survey methodology (CSAS) that unites advances in natural language processing and adaptive algorithms..."

#FirstView
The image features the text "POLITICAL ANALYSIS" in large white letters on a crimson background, with "#OpenAccess" in smaller white letters above a yellow bar below.
Reposted by Yamil Ricardo Velez
ispp-pops.bsky.social
Special Issue Alert!

How do digital & social media fuel alternative identities, extreme narratives & online communities in times of crisis?

Submit your work exploring their role in propaganda, misinformation, and reshaping society!

ispp.org/wp/wp-conten...

@polpsyispp.bsky.social #polisky
Call for papers for a special issue. Special issue title is Responding to socio-political challenges online through radical or extreme narratives and alternative forms of collective identities. Guest Editors: Theofilos Gkinopoulos (Behavior in Crisis Lab, Institute of Psychology,
Jagiellonian University), Malgorzata Kossowska (Behavior in Crisis Lab, Institute of
Psychology, Jagiellonian University), Ana Guinote (University College London), Jesper
Strömbäck (University of Gothenburg)