Huge thanks to the editors and reviewers for all constructive comments along the way. Read the insightful editorial: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

Editorial: (the paper) 'set[s] directions on timely organizational phenomena' and 'serves as an example for the kind of critical, multidisciplinary dialogue that Human Relations has long championed: one that connects organizational processes to societal structures of power and inequality.' ❤️

In the paper, we review lit across CS/DS, Social Sciences, Law, and HRM, bringing Acker's 'inequality regimes' into the digital age (algorithm-mediated inequality regimes) & developing 'chain of knowledge' and 'chain of responsibility' for understanding and regulating the use of AI in orgs.

Editorial: (the paper) 'set[s] directions on timely organizational phenomena' and 'serves as an example for the kind of critical, multidisciplinary dialogue that Human Relations has long championed: one that connects organizational processes to societal structures of power and inequality.' ❤️

In the paper, we review lit across CS/DS, Social Sciences, Law, and HRM, bringing Acker's 'inequality regimes' into the digital age (algorithm-mediated inequality regimes) & developing 'chain of knowledge' and 'chain of responsibility' for understanding and regulating the use of AI in orgs.

🤓 Read the whole SI 'Young Adult Life Courses in the Global South': www.sciencedirect.com/special-issu... Huge thanks to all authors – we learnt so much from all the papers, and the editorial process has been a wonderful journey of global knowledge co-production for us all 🎉 🫶

@sriucl.bsky.social

With alt-text:

Yikes…that’s too bad…and I’d also like the publishers not to use AI for typesetting (and messing our carefully prepared manuscripts up)

Perhaps do include LinkedIn next : )