NASA’s Webb Observes Exoplanet Whose Composition Defies Explanation - NASA Science

So I’m now using Opera, with its alleged VPN, making me harder to identify. But It’s one company, and it may be lying…or at some stage it may lie, be purcha...

Wow[Deep Mind Thinking She discovered that breast milk changes its formula based on whether the baby is a boy or girl. Then she found something even more shocking: the baby's spit tells the mother's body what medicine to make. 2008 Katie Hinde stood in a California primate research lab staring at data that didn't make sense. She was analyzing milk samples from rhesus macaque mothers—hundreds of samples, thousands of measurements. And the pattern was impossible to ignore: Mothers with sons produced milk with higher fat and protein concentrations. Mothers with daughters produced larger volumes with different nutrient ratios. The milk wasn't the same. It was customized. Her male colleagues dismissed it immediately. "Measurement error." "Random variation." "Probably nothing." But Katie Hinde trusted the numbers. And the numbers were screaming something revolutionary: Milk wasn't just food. It was a message. For decades, science had treated breast milk like gasoline—a delivery system for calories and nutrients. Simple fuel. But if milk was just nutrition, why would it be different for sons versus daughters? Katie kept digging. She analyzed over 250 mothers across more than 700 sampling events. And with each analysis, the picture became clearer—and more astonishing. Young, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but dramatically higher cortisol (stress hormone) levels. Babies who drank this high-cortisol milk grew faster but were more nervous, more vigilant, less confident. The milk wasn't just feeding the baby's body. It was programming the baby's temperament. Then Katie discovered something that seemed almost impossible. When a baby nurses, tiny amounts of saliva travel back through the nipple into the mother's breast tissue. That saliva contains information about the baby's immune status. If the baby is fighting an infection, the mother's body detects it—and begins producing specific antibodies within hours. The white blood cell count in the milk would jump from 2,000 to over 5,000 during illness. Macrophage counts would quadruple. Then, once the baby recovered, everything would return to normal. It was a conversation. A biological dialogue between two bodies. The baby's spit told the mother what was wrong. The mother's body responded with exactly the medicine needed. A language invisible to science for centuries. Katie joined Harvard in 2011 and started digging into existing research. What she found was disturbing: there were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition. The world's first food—the substance that nourished every human who ever lived—was scientifically neglected. So she started a blog with a deliberately provocative title: "Mammals Suck...Milk!" Within a year: over a million views. Parents, doctors, scientists asking questions research had ignored. Her discoveries kept coming: Milk changes throughout the day (fat peaks mid-morning) Foremilk differs from hindmilk (babies who nurse longer get higher-fat milk at the end) Over 200 types of oligosaccharides in human milk that babies can't even digest—they exist solely to feed beneficial gut bacteria Every mother's milk is unique as a fingerprint In 2017, she delivered a TED talk that millions have watched. In 2020, she appeared in Netflix's "Babies" docuseries, explaining her discoveries to a global audience. Today, at Arizona State University's Comparative Lactation Lab, Dr. Katie Hinde continues revealing how milk shapes infant development from the first hours of life. Her work informs care for fragile infants in NICUs. Improves formula for mothers who can't breastfeed. Shapes public health policy worldwide. The implications are profound. Milk has been evolving for 200 million years—longer than dinosaurs. What science dismissed as "simple nutrition" was actually the most sophisticated biological communication system on Earth. Katie Hinde didn't just study milk. She revealed that the most ancient form of nourishment was also the most intelligent—a dynamic, responsive conversation between two bodies that has been shaping human development since the beginning of our species. All because one scientist refused to accept that half the conversation was "measurement error." Sometimes the most revolutionary discoveries come from paying attention to what everyone else dismisses.]

How did copilot introduce a feature that produces this "error" message, recently, anytime someone uses a simple text prompt (no file upload) on Tor browser? "Try that one more time The file didn't come through. Try uploading again. "

Wow[While millions died from malaria and modern medicine failed, a 39-year-old Chinese scientist found the cure in a 1,600-year-old recipe. The year was 1969. Malaria was killing over one million people annually. Western drugs had stopped working—the parasite had evolved resistance. In China, cut off from the global scientific community during the Cultural Revolution, resources were scarce and options were running out. That's when Tu Youyou received a classified assignment that would change the world. She was recruited into Project 523, a secret military research initiative with one desperate mission: find a cure for malaria. While other scientists looked forward, searching for new synthetic compounds, Tu looked backward—into China's vast archive of ancient medical texts. For months, she and her team reviewed over 2,000 traditional Chinese medicine recipes spanning centuries. Most led nowhere. But one entry in a text from 340 AD caught her attention: an extract from Artemisia annua, sweet wormwood, used to treat intermittent fevers. Other researchers had already tried and dismissed it. The plant showed promise in ancient records but failed in modern labs. Tu noticed something everyone else had missed. The ancient recipe specified a "cold extraction" method—soaking the plant in cold water rather than boiling it. Modern scientists had been using heat, which destroyed the active compound before it could be isolated. She followed the 1,600-year-old instructions exactly. On October 4, 1971, using ether at low temperatures, she extracted a crystalline compound. Sample 191 showed 100% effectiveness against the malaria parasite. But before she could test it on patients, Tu did something extraordinary: she tested it on herself. At a time when clinical trials barely existed in China, when political persecution for failed experiments was real, Tu Youyou volunteered herself as the first human subject. She wanted to prove it was safe before risking anyone else. It worked. The compound, named artemisinin, became the foundation of modern malaria treatment. Artemisinin-based combination therapies have since saved millions of lives across Asia, Africa, and South America—particularly children under five, malaria's most vulnerable victims. In 2015, at age 85, Tu Youyou stood in Stockholm and became the first Chinese woman to receive the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. In her characteristically humble speech, she didn't claim personal glory. She thanked her team, honored traditional Chinese medicine, and reminded the world that wisdom isn't confined to any single era or culture. "Every scientist dreams of doing something that can help humanity," she said simply. Tu Youyou proved that the most cutting-edge breakthrough can come from the most ancient wisdom. That scientific revolution sometimes means having the humility to listen to voices from centuries ago. That one patient researcher, working with limited resources but unlimited dedication, can reach across time itself to save millions. The cure for one of humanity's oldest killers was waiting in a text written 1,600 years ago. It just needed someone wise enough to read it correctly.]

Best Improv Line Ever 😂 | All In The Family

so it's a genuine trump post

Hero suffers two gunshot wounds in Bondi beach shooting | 7NEWS

Power and Poverty: Inside South Africa’s inequality crisis - Global Eye, BBC World Service

twice