#PrincesStreet
LightNews LightNews
spokes.org.uk
#Edinburgh #Cycling developments 2026 (?)

Our thoughts--> www.spokes.org.uk/2026/01/2025...

🤔 #MainRoad protected lanes
🤔 #Tram
🤔 #PrincesStreet
🤔 #BraidEstate
🤔 Plans: #CCWEL extension, #LothianRoad
🤔 #DemandManagement: #TrafficFilters #charging
🤔 #BusLanes
🤔 Use of officer time
... and much more
Start of Spokes article... 2025–>2026 : What for Edinburgh Cycling Policy & Action? Will 2026 see Edinburgh City‘s new ‘Primary Cycle Network’ definition start to turn from policy into reality? And what of the City’s hugely ambitious 30% by 2030 traffic-reduction aims? What other decisions or actions may we see in the coming year? Picture of a bollarded route due to be upgraded in 2026 as part of the main-road 'Primary Cycle Network' Picture of Foot of Walk to Dock Street under construction - opening in 2026 Huge amounts of precious time having to be spent by officers in reassuring & re-reassuring worried councillors on issues where evidence is already pretty solid... In conclusion, a random thought Looking back on the stories above, one has to be struck by the huge amount of precious officer time that is devoted to handling the concerns of councillors worried by objections which in the end often prove either irrelevant or largely unfounded. Time which could be spent far more productively. Here are some examples… There is no better example than the saga of the Travelling Safely experimental Orders and the role of the TRO subcommittee (see ‘2025’ near the start of this article), resulting in additional meetings and literally hundreds of pages of reports [e.g. this 682-page download for their third meeting covering much of the same ground] The Braid Estate story (see above) is another – huge amounts of time in meetings, massive reports, preparation of traffic orders, finding contractors, abortive costs – all in aid of a messy compromise experiment, unwanted by many, and which may now not happen Most recently, the decision of TRO Sub to postpone a decision on whether to allow east-bound cycling in Rose Street, where westbound has been legal for decades. Officers now have to prepare a report on issues such as whether bikes may collide with cafe tables or get through any roadworks that might happen, even though the existing west-bound cycling works perfectly well. Is there a solution to this tragic time-wasting, delaying projects which are far more safety and environmentally significant? Certainly, objections must be heard, and councillors must interrogate officers. Some objections do have real substance. But when evidence is clear, and plainly laid out by officers when questioned at Committee (as, largely, in the above examples) surely there must be a mechanism for making councillors think twice. Is yet another investigation, more reports, more meetings, mor…
January 3, 2026 at 6:03 PM
hippy-hipster.bsky.social
Pigeon Lady. Jun 2023. #photography #street #pigeons #edinburgh #princesstreet
December 29, 2025 at 12:23 PM
holledge.bsky.social
My understanding — correct me if I'm am wrong — is that the necessary wider pavement was rejected by @Edinburgh_CC in the Princes St & Waverley Valley Strategy (below). 3/
www.edinburgh.gov.uk/princesstreet
Princes Street and Waverley Valley Strategy
Information on the draft strategy for Princes Street and the wider Waverley Valley, including Princes Street Gardens, the Ross Bandstand and Waverley Station.
www.edinburgh.gov.uk
December 21, 2025 at 8:39 AM
inarc-dk.bsky.social
Booked a single night cheaper EDI hotel and forgot to consider noise. #edinburgh #princesstreet #xmasmarket #bright #noise #hotel
December 20, 2025 at 10:59 AM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet

Separated 🚲 lanes (& more 🚶space) could still happen

🙋 See article in recent circular to Spokes members
--> bsky.app/profile/spok...

@blackfordsaferoutes.co.uk @edi.bike @finlaymcf.bsky.social @leftwing66.bsky.social @cllrcmiller.bsky.social @cllrjomo.bsky.social @edfoc.bsky.social
Post by Blackford Safe Routes ‪@blackfordsaferoutes.co.uk‬ with 'heatmap' showing bike numbers in Princes St. It’s clear from this heatmap that people will continue to ride bikes on Princes St, despite there being no cycle lanes - it’s where the shops, gardens & destinations are Imagine how much more use it would get if we built protected bike lanes here start of spokes Princes St article in member circular Spokes Action-Update 1.12.25 spokes.org.uk St Martins Centre, 232 Dalry Road EH11 2JG 0131.313.2114 bluesky: @spokes.org.uk 0. Finding your councillors In Edinburgh, find your ward & councillors by typing your postcode on this page [or edinburgh.gov.uk : Council & Committees : Find your Councillor]. Everyone has either 3 or 4 councillors, usually from assorted parties. For any Council, and to find MSPs, you can use writetothem.com. 1. Princes Street (interim) success Spokes has had a major success in our seemingly interminable campaign for bike lanes, and more pedestrian space, on Princes Street. If you emailed councillors when we suggested, thank you! Eventual success is still very far from certain, but the Planning Committee, by 9 votes to 4, rejected a draft strategy for Princes Street and the Waverley Valley which would have ruled out bike lanes and wider footways completely. This is highly significant, as it is very unusual for councillors to ask officers to go away and have a complete rethink on a major draft strategy document. The Spokes written deputation to the Committee is here.
December 15, 2025 at 7:16 PM
travolax.com
A festive season in Edinburgh, Scotland.

#edinburgh #scotland #princesstreet #christmas #travel
December 8, 2025 at 6:50 PM
spokes.org.uk
🙋 Spokes Action-Update members' email circular

--> www.spokes.org.uk/wp-content/u...

includes:
#PrincesStreet
#SUV
#Christmas
#Tram
...

@edi.bike @alastairdalton.bsky.social @edfoc.bsky.social @gregorsteele.bsky.social @2760.bsky.social @thecockburn.bsky.social @edinburghwh.bsky.social @sw20.info
Join spokes to get on the mailing list for Action Update circulars... http://www.spokes.org.uk/membership/ INtro to Princes St article... 1. Princes Street (interim) success Spokes has had a major success in our seemingly interminable campaign for bike lanes, and more pedestrian space, on Princes Street. If you emailed councillors when we suggested, thank you! Eventual success is still very far from certain, but the Planning Committee, by 9 votes to 4, rejected a draft strategy for Princes Street and the Waverley Valley which would have ruled out bike lanes and wider footways completely. This is highly significant, as it is very unusual for councillors to ask officers to go away and have a complete rethink on a major draft strategy document. The Spokes written deputation to the Committee is here. Spokes tram consultation response, extract... Our submission covers many points, but three major issues (concerns and opportunities!) are.. • Great concern over cycling safety in the Bridges corridor. We put forward a range of ameliorative or alternative measures, including single-line working, one-way tram (with Pleasance/Market Street the other way), tramlines on one side of the road with a cycleroute on the other, a bus gate/traffic filter; or choosing one of the other routes which are still seen by the Council as possible future options, such as Morrison Street and the Meadows (an option also favoured by Edinburgh World Heritage) • We urge dropping North Bridge tram stop and replacing it by two stops – at Waverley Steps to serve east Princes Street and the rail station, and at the North Bridge arcade, to serve the Old Town and again the rail station. There are multiple reasons for this suggestion, in addition to a major cycling safety aspect • There is a massive opportunity to incorporate an active travel bridge over the mainline railway, linking North Edinburgh Network to the new Roseburn to Fountainbridge path without long ramps down to road level and up again. This would be a truly transformative addition to the city’s offroad network. Our drawing shows the tram (red) ramping up to the A8 crossing, with the active travel path in orange. The yellow dotted ramps are probably not needed, since most users would stay at high level, and those needing local access could ascend either at Roseburn or at the existing new Sauchiebank ramp. Christmas ideas... 5.1 Spokes Maps! How would you like to give your friends or relations a Xmas present which is “really brilliant,” “a beautiful piece of work,” and “can’t be spoken highly enough of” ? Well – that’s what people say about Spokes Maps!! Need we say more? Getting your copy/copies • Single copies available at most good bike or book shops, or from Spokes, cost £7.50 each for Edinburgh or West Lothian, and £6.95 for Mid or East Lothian • Buy 6 or more copies at £5 each (Ed/WL) or £4.60 (ML/EL) – for your six favourite friends or relations; or share an order with workmates/ friends/relations • See here for more info and how to order from Spokes. 5.2 Xmas tree cargo-bike delivery If buying a Christmas tree, check out TreeWorks who will arrange cargobike delivery by the Cycling Gardeners of Edinburgh to central Edinburgh addresses. Our bluesky post of this proved very popular - please pass it on!
December 3, 2025 at 12:19 PM
scottishinsider.org
🪬🧿 Princes Street: Gardens on One Side, Shops on the Other #PrincesStreet #Edinburgh #VisitScotland #Scotland #Travel #EdinburghCastle #Cityscape #UrbanExploration #Shopping #Views youtube.com/shorts/5Oe4J...
Princes Street: Gardens on One Side, Shops on the Other #scotland #shorts #edinburgh
YouTube video by Journey Dude - Scottish Insider
youtube.com
November 20, 2025 at 8:28 AM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet👍

☝️ see above

@euandavidson.bsky.social @edthornley.bsky.social @jackrmcaldwell.bsky.social @cllrcmiller.bsky.social @finlaymcf.bsky.social @mhbastian.bsky.social @andyheald.bsky.social @thecockburn.bsky.social @harryjwilliams.bsky.social @helenrambler.bsky.social @edtiss.bsky.social
November 19, 2025 at 11:49 AM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet

👍 Follow-up to above Planning Cttee decision

-> www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/edinbur...

We've now a genuine *hope* to cut traffic lanes 4->2 with more 🚶👩‍🦼space & 🚲 lanes

@edi.bike @stephenjenkinson.bsky.social @davidfkey.bsky.social @kevin-lang.bsky.social @edfoc.bsky.social
Part of Evening News article “I'm not suggesting you would just take Richard’s plan and implement that, but he's done something that is really interesting, really ambitious and I think it helps to achieve the thing which we want Princes Street to be - a place you want to come to and spend a lot of time in. “It challenged some of the conventions, it was a proper reimagining of what Princes Street is and could be. It's that kind of thinking we need if this is really going to return to being the vibrant beating heart of Edinburgh.” Planning convener Joan Griffiths said: “We’re committed to taking forward a workshop to progress the strategy to allow us to realise the city’s aspirations for Princes Street and come back to committee with a revised version for approval in late 2026.” more from the Ev News article... Cllr Lang said: “Princes Street is going to be very different in the future. It’s never going to be about trying to return Princes Street to being a retail hub. The question is what is it that will make this whole area a space that people want to come and spend more time in more often? “It’s right that we take more time to get the vision right. Otherwise we're at risk of making the wrong decisions now that then hold us back from transforming what this street is.” He noted that Edinburgh architect Richard Murphy had produced alternative ideas for Princes Street after the council masterplan was criticised. These included removing the railings from Princes Street Gardens and having the space open 24 hours a day, as well as widening the pavements and reducing the traffic lanes from four to two. Cllr Lang said: “He was talking about a big increase in the footways and circulation space, where people could meet and you could have markets and stalls, rethinking Princes Street Gardens, making them open for more of the time, and making all these safe and welcoming green spaces. Spokes post about Planning Cttee decision to seek a better Princes St outcome... SpokesLothian‬ ‪@spokes.org.uk‬ · 6d Replied to you #PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast 👍 Amendment passed, voting 7-4 👍 Fantastic news! Transport & wider considerations must now be incorporated in the strategy This might not have happened without long-term effort/persistence by Spokes & the visionary/technical expertise of Richard Murphy architects
November 19, 2025 at 11:31 AM
spokes.org.uk
👆 #PrincesStreet - see thread above

🤩 positive outcome!!

@blackfordsaferoutes.co.uk @ssc-edinburgh.bsky.social @harryjwilliams.bsky.social @livingstreetsedi.bsky.social @edinpl.bsky.social @keithirving.bsky.social @stephenjenkinson.bsky.social @carltonreid.com @urbaneprofessor.bsky.social
November 12, 2025 at 4:30 PM
spokes.org.uk
👆 #PrincesStreet

🤩 positive outcome!! - see thread above

@edi.bike @thecockburn.bsky.social @edinreporter.bsky.social @edinburghminute.bsky.social @turvill.bsky.social @severincarrell.bsky.social @alastairdalton.bsky.social @threadinburgh.scot @vickyallan.bsky.social @sw20.info @edfoc.bsky.social
SpokesLothian ‪@spokes.org.uk‬ #PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast 👍 Amendment passed, voting 7-4 👍 Fantastic news! Transport & wider considerations must now be incorporated in the strategy This might not have happened without long-term effort/persistence by Spokes & the visionary/technical expertise of Richard Murphy architects Cllr @chasbooth.bsky.social refers to tramline death of #ZhiMinSoh --> www.spokes.org.uk/2022/06/zhi-... - Quotes Spokes deputation that tramline crashes can only end by segregated bike lanes - Supports #LibDem amendment to seek fuller discussion and expertise #PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast Q: Cllr @kevin-lang.bsky.social asks why not more ambitious, given earlier criticism Four traffic lanes wrong for Princes St, placemaking & #TransportHierarchy A: Public response to consultn v positive. Some traffic measures under Future STreets policy. More in future Cllr @davidfkey.bsky.social supports Spokes submission, New Town Comm Council and #RichardMurphy ideas - these all fit #PrincesStreet best Cllr @alexstaniforth.bsky.social jokes that #LibDem amendment better than Greens, so Greens will support it.
November 12, 2025 at 4:24 PM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast

👍 Amendment passed, voting 7-4

👍 Fantastic news! Transport & wider considerations must now be incorporated in the strategy

This might not have happened without long-term effort/persistence by Spokes & the visionary/technical expertise of Richard Murphy architects
Crucial parts of the successful amendment 4. notes the interventions made by some which seek to place a greater emphasis on placemaking and respecting the transport hierarchy. 5. therefore, agrees not to adopt the strategy at this stage. 6. instead agrees that officers should seek to convene an elected member/officer/stakeholder workshop that brings together those with transport, culture, heritage and placemaking expertise so a more ambitious and exciting strategy can be brought forward for approval. Moved by: Cllr Hal Osler Seconded by: Cllr Kevin Lang Pictures showing type of vision proposed by Richard Murphy, with 2 bus/tram lanes, bike lanes and much wider footways. This type of solution will now - hopefully - get serious consideration Start of the Spokes submission http://www.spokes.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/251112-CEC-PLANNING-COMMITTEE-SPOKES-Deputation-princes-st.pdf CEC PLANNING COMMITTEE, 12.11.25 - written deputation from Spokes 7.3 Non-Statutory Planning Guidance – Finalised Princes Street and Waverley Valley Strategy The proposed draft guidance, whilst including many worthwhile proposals, has one over-riding failing, in that it completely neglects the huge area of land occupied by roadway, and assumes it must stay as now. It is as if we have separate Planning and Transport departments rather than a unified Place department. This cannot be the right approach for a holistic view of Princes Street and the Waverley Valley. Nor is it right that large amounts of money should be invested without the whole area being considered in a unified manner. The earlier, consultation, proposals were widely criticised by the West End and New Town Community Councils, by internationally renowned Richard Murphy architects, and others for lacking ambition and imagination. Nor did they go anywhere near the recommendations of the Council's commissioned report by urban designer Jan Gehl, way back in 2010, who identified "cycle and pedestrian priority" and reduced vehicle presence as "essential" for Princes Street to achieve its "huge potential." Sadly, the draft Guidance document presented today shows little change in these respects. It fails to live up to what is expected in the heart of a modern European capital. Richard Murphy Architects have put forward the sort of approach which takes these issues seriously (website; full report) and looks at how the entire area, including the roadway, can be transformed into a place catering properly for walking, wheeling and cycling, together with effective tram and bus services, and with much greater scope for enjoying the incredible setting of Scotland's premier street. In particular, Murphy points out how much of the Princes Street roadspace is currently just e…
November 12, 2025 at 4:12 PM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast

Cllr @davidfkey.bsky.social supports Spokes submission, New Town Comm Council and #RichardMurphy ideas - these all fit #PrincesStreet best

Cllr @alexstaniforth.bsky.social jokes that #LibDem amendment better than Greens, so Greens will support it.
Cllr Key Cllr Staniforth
November 12, 2025 at 4:02 PM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast

Cllr @chasbooth.bsky.social refers to tramline death of #ZhiMinSoh

--> www.spokes.org.uk/2022/06/zhi-...

- Quotes Spokes deputation that tramline crashes can only end by segregated bike lanes
- Supports #LibDem amendment to seek fuller discussion and expertise
November 12, 2025 at 3:58 PM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast

Cllr @kevin-lang.bsky.social moves #LibDem amendment

The proposal is 'tinkering,' doesn't fit Princes Street and what it should be

Cllr #HalOsler seconds. Need more ambitious strategy
Amendment by the Liberal Democrat Group Planning Committee 12 November 2025 2026 Item 7.3 – Non - Statutory Planning Guidance – Finalised Princes St and Waverley Valley Strategy Committee 1. Expresses its thanks to officers for their hard work in creating a draft Princes St and Waverley Valley Strategy and reviewing the responses received in the recent consultation. 2. recognises the vital importance of getting this strategy right given the iconic importance of Princes Street and Princes Street Gardens to the whole City. 3. notes the concerns raised by several organisations and groups that the proposed strategy still lacks ambition and imagination, and fails to provide the kind of vision needed to ensure Princes Street and the surrounding area are vibrant and welcoming places. 4. notes the interventions made by some which seek to place a greater emphasis on placemaking and respecting the transport hierarchy. 5. therefore, agrees not to adopt the strategy at this stage. 6. instead agrees that officers should seek to convene an elected member/officer/stakeholder workshop that brings together those with transport, culture, heritage and placemaking expertise so a more ambitious and exciting strategy can be brought forward for approval. Moved by: Cllr Hal Osler Seconded by: Cllr Kevin Lang Cllr Osler
November 12, 2025 at 3:51 PM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast

Q: Cllr @davidfkey.bsky.social asks if the right question was asked re segregated bike lanes
A: Cycle lane on pavement was not wanted

[Spokes note: the QA only asked re bike lanes in the footway, not in the carriageway, hence negative public response!]
Cllr Key
November 12, 2025 at 3:43 PM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast

Q: Cllr @kevin-lang.bsky.social asks why not more ambitious, given earlier criticism
Four traffic lanes wrong for Princes St, placemaking & #TransportHierarchy

A: Public response to consultn v positive. Some traffic measures under Future STreets policy. More in future
Cllr Lang
November 12, 2025 at 3:40 PM
spokes.org.uk
#PrincesStreet #Edinwebcast

Q: Cllr Mowat says the strategy not very different from the existing
A: Happy to look at bigger changes in future

Q: Cllr @chasbooth.bsky.social asks why report doesn't also involve transport Cttee
A: It does tie in with existing policies, so not needed
Cllr Mowat Cllr Booth speaking
November 12, 2025 at 3:33 PM
spokes.org.uk
☝️ #PrincesStreet plans unfit for modern #European capital

🙋 Wed 11 Nov p.m. #Planning Cttee debate

Item 7.3 on agenda--> democracy.edinburgh.gov.uk/ieListDocume...

Webcast--> edinburgh.public-i.tv/core/portal/...

@edi.bike @edfoc.bsky.social @chdot.bsky.social @sw20.info @thecockburn.bsky.social
start of spokes deputation http://www.spokes.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/251112-CEC-PLANNING-COMMITTEE-SPOKES-Deputation-princes-st.pdf CEC PLANNING COMMITTEE, 12.11.25 - written deputation from Spokes 7.3 Non-Statutory Planning Guidance – Finalised Princes Street and Waverley Valley Strategy The proposed draft guidance, whilst including many worthwhile proposals, has one over-riding failing, in that it completely neglects the huge area of land occupied by roadway, and assumes it must stay as now. It is as if we have separate Planning and Transport departments rather than a unified Place department. This cannot be the right approach for a holistic view of Princes Street and the Waverley Valley. Nor is it right that large amounts of money should be invested without the whole area being considered in a unified manner. The earlier, consultation, proposals were widely criticised by the West End and New Town Community Councils, by internationally renowned Richard Murphy architects, and others for lacking ambition and imagination. Nor did they go anywhere near the recommendations of the Council's commissioned report by urban designer Jan Gehl, way back in 2010, who identified "cycle and pedestrian priority" and reduced vehicle presence as "essential" for Princes Street to achieve its "huge potential." Sadly, the draft Guidance document presented today shows little change in these respects. It fails to live up to what is expected in the heart of a modern European capital.
November 12, 2025 at 2:09 PM
spokes.org.uk
☝️ #PrincesStreet plans unfit for modern #European capital

👍 Excellent amendments by #LibDems & #Greens

🤔 Hope other parties agree!!

@edi.bike @chasbooth.bsky.social @nellibdems.bsky.social @kevin-lang.bsky.social @davidfkey.bsky.social @mthmttcoe.bsky.social @cllrbenparker.bsky.social @sw20.info
Amendment by the Liberal Democrat Group Planning Committee 12 November 2025 2026 Item 7.3 – Non - Statutory Planning Guidance – Finalised Princes St and Waverley Valley Strategy Committee 1. Expresses its thanks to officers for their hard work in creating a draft Princes St and Waverley Valley Strategy and reviewing the responses received in the recent consultation. 2. recognises the vital importance of getting this strategy right given the iconic importance of Princes Street and Princes Street Gardens to the whole City. 3. notes the concerns raised by several organisations and groups that the proposed strategy still lacks ambition and imagination, and fails to provide the kind of vision needed to ensure Princes Street and the surrounding area are vibrant and welcoming places. 4. notes the interventions made by some which seek to place a greater emphasis on placemaking and respecting the transport hierarchy. 5. therefore, agrees not to adopt the strategy at this stage. 6. instead agrees that officers should seek to convene an elected member/officer/stakeholder workshop that brings together those with transport, culture, heritage and placemaking expertise so a more ambitious and exciting strategy can be brought forward for approval. Moved by: Cllr Hal Osler Seconded by: Cllr Kevin Lang Amendment by the Green Group Planning Committee 12 November 2025 Item 7.3 Non-Statutory Planning Guidance – Finalised Princes Street and Waverley Valley Strategy In recommendations: Add at the end of paragraph 1.1.1, “further notes concerns expressed by active travel groups and Richard Murphy architects amongst others at the inconsistency between the transport aspects of the strategy (chapter 5) and the City Mobility Plan and Our Future Streets;” Amends paragraph 1.1.2 to read, “Approve the planning aspects of the Princes Street and Waverley Valley Strategy at Appendix 3 as non-statutory planning guidance under City Plan 2030, subject to referral of this report to the Transport and Environment Committee and the Culture and Communities Committee to allow them to consider the sections of the strategy within their remit.” and Amends paragraph 1.1.3 to delete the word “Interim” Moved by: Cllr Chas Booth
November 11, 2025 at 3:50 PM
spokes.org.uk
☝️ above

#PrincesStreet plans unfit for modern #European capital

@edinburghminute.bsky.social @vickyallan.bsky.social @best-edinburgh.bsky.social @jarlathflynn.bsky.social ‬ @d4cae.bsky.social @secretedinburgh.bsky.social @thebonnieloon.bsky.social @lowtrafficfuture.bsky.social
November 10, 2025 at 12:34 PM
spokes.org.uk
☝️ above

#PrincesStreet plans unfit for modern #European capital

@jilliananable.bsky.social @2760.bsky.social @urbaneprofessor.bsky.social @mhbastian.bsky.social @johnrobson87.bsky.social @robbieainsworth.bsky.social @euanbaxter.bsky.social @yunod.sustainabletranslator.scot @keithirving.bsky.social
November 10, 2025 at 12:09 PM
spokes.org.uk
☝️ see above

#PrincesStreet plans unfit for modern #European capital

@marklazarowicz.bsky.social @drcarolinebrown.bsky.social @olord.bsky.social @brenttoderian.bsky.social @helenrambler.bsky.social @bike-freedom.bsky.social @da-anderson.bsky.social @plandillon.bsky.social @cleancitiescampaign.org
November 10, 2025 at 12:01 PM
spokes.org.uk
☝️ see above

#PrincesStreet plans unfit for modern #European capital

@blackfordsaferoutes.co.uk @ssc-edinburgh.bsky.social @deleriad.bsky.social @harryjwilliams.bsky.social @edtiss.bsky.social @edcriticalmass.bsky.social @infrasisters.bsky.social @livingstreetsedi.bsky.social @chdot.bsky.social
November 10, 2025 at 11:53 AM