A fresh release of records connected to the Epstein Files is stirring renewed scrutiny after revealing a series of unverified tips and allegations that were submitted to federal authorities over the years. Among the documents is a summary of a tip alleging that an underage girl was forced to perform oral sex on Donald Trump approximately 35 years ago in New Jersey. According to the summary, the girl was described as being about 13 to 14 years old at the time of the alleged incident. The document states the alleged victim “allegedly bit President Trump while performing oral sex” and was “allegedly hit in the face after she laughed about biting President Trump.” Federal paperwork indicates the tip was reviewed and then forwarded to the Washington Field Office for follow-up, including a potential interview. The records do not state whether any interview took place or whether the allegation was substantiated. The same release contains several additional claims involving Trump that authorities either found not credible or were unable to investigate further. One allegation came from a woman who claimed she was both a victim and a witness to a sex trafficking operation at a Trump golf course in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, during the mid-1990s. Investigators noted the claim but ultimately determined it lacked credibility. Another entry references a call from a woman claiming to be incarcerated who mentioned Lisa Marie Presley, the British Royal Family, Trump, and Jeffrey Epstein. Officials reported they were unable to make contact with her and believed she was living in Australia. Additional tips included claims from women who said they were abused as minors or knew someone who believed she was assaulted at Trump Plaza in 1987. In each case, federal officials stated they could not reach the individuals making the claims. When asked for comment, the White House pointed to a statement issued by the Department of Justice alongside the document release. The statement reads, “This production may include fake or falsely submitted images, documents or videos, as everything that was sent to the FBI by the public was included in the production that is responsive to the Act. Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election. To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.” Review of the newly released materials is ongoing as attention around the files continues to build.