In early 2026, Google, Meta, X, YouTube, TikTok in🇺🇸 have made significant adjustments to their algorithms, prioritizing "Authoritative Public Safety Information" over user-generated content or voices.
This means disnformation, censorship and excessive data control from the government⚠️
This means disnformation, censorship and excessive data control from the government⚠️
For those who aren't aware, Google's AI summary chatbot Gemini is programmed to refuse to acknowledge that Joe Biden won the 2020 election. Compare the two cases:
January 19, 2026 at 9:07 PM
In early 2026, Google, Meta, X, YouTube, TikTok in🇺🇸 have made significant adjustments to their algorithms, prioritizing "Authoritative Public Safety Information" over user-generated content or voices.
This means disnformation, censorship and excessive data control from the government⚠️
This means disnformation, censorship and excessive data control from the government⚠️
Conservative disinfotainment has created a separate reality for their voting base that's filled with absolute fiction.
It's the playbook maga has used with everything to push out consistent disnformation that has been so destructive to the US.
It's the playbook maga has used with everything to push out consistent disnformation that has been so destructive to the US.
January 8, 2026 at 9:22 PM
Conservative disinfotainment has created a separate reality for their voting base that's filled with absolute fiction.
It's the playbook maga has used with everything to push out consistent disnformation that has been so destructive to the US.
It's the playbook maga has used with everything to push out consistent disnformation that has been so destructive to the US.
Another insightful Thread abt disnformation.
The thread as a shareable webpage: https://skywriter.blue/pages/did:plc:w4sp23lb6nuq6favabnuehxe/post/3mbgscuh3ax2p.
Page by Gavril Ducu 🇷🇴 🇩🇪 🇺🇸 🇳🇱 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 | @ducugavril.nafoforum.org - skywriter.blue
Disinformation is often discussed in theory. This is a real case.
One event, one place, real people, real consequences. The point here is not who is right politically, but how people can be pushed into acting against their own material interests....
skywriter.blue
January 2, 2026 at 1:59 PM
Another insightful Thread abt disnformation.
So you have energy to spread grifters disnformation but you choose not to defend it
BlueMAGA
BlueMAGA
December 18, 2025 at 2:50 PM
So you have energy to spread grifters disnformation but you choose not to defend it
BlueMAGA
BlueMAGA
Second, she then completely misstates what the Supreme Court decided. She says it decided the question of who should be able to access single sex spaces. That's just flat out mis or disnformation. Here's what Lord Hodge said.
December 14, 2025 at 11:35 AM
Second, she then completely misstates what the Supreme Court decided. She says it decided the question of who should be able to access single sex spaces. That's just flat out mis or disnformation. Here's what Lord Hodge said.
disnformation for hire, many of the most horrible "journalists" work or have worked there
November 21, 2025 at 8:29 PM
disnformation for hire, many of the most horrible "journalists" work or have worked there
If terrorism can be defined as "the use of violence by non-state actors to achieve political change and political outcomes", then what we have from FoxNews and GBnews is terrorism via disnformation - the use of exaggeration and lies to achieve political change without accountability.
November 4, 2025 at 5:42 AM
If terrorism can be defined as "the use of violence by non-state actors to achieve political change and political outcomes", then what we have from FoxNews and GBnews is terrorism via disnformation - the use of exaggeration and lies to achieve political change without accountability.
Surely you are aware of the fact that the building wasn't a listed historical landmark in 1948, correct?
I mean, if you were aware of that and posted this anyway, that would make your post apparently disinformation.
What would cause a person to decide to post disnformation? Why would one do that?
I mean, if you were aware of that and posted this anyway, that would make your post apparently disinformation.
What would cause a person to decide to post disnformation? Why would one do that?
October 21, 2025 at 9:27 AM
Surely you are aware of the fact that the building wasn't a listed historical landmark in 1948, correct?
I mean, if you were aware of that and posted this anyway, that would make your post apparently disinformation.
What would cause a person to decide to post disnformation? Why would one do that?
I mean, if you were aware of that and posted this anyway, that would make your post apparently disinformation.
What would cause a person to decide to post disnformation? Why would one do that?
I know what the thread is about. My point, apparently poorly presented, is why have a thread about a news organization that spreads disnformation.
September 20, 2025 at 7:14 PM
I know what the thread is about. My point, apparently poorly presented, is why have a thread about a news organization that spreads disnformation.
they need to retract the original story. i hope somebody reveals the source. It appears WSJ was misled by someone in government who might have had a deliberate intention of creating a false narrative and public deserves to know if public employees are using their offices to spread disnformation.
September 12, 2025 at 7:42 PM
they need to retract the original story. i hope somebody reveals the source. It appears WSJ was misled by someone in government who might have had a deliberate intention of creating a false narrative and public deserves to know if public employees are using their offices to spread disnformation.