Scholar

Jason Chin

Videos
H-index: 13
Law 35%
Political science 12%
more

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
Also the winner of our ECR award - excellent book Sonia!
anupress.bsky.social
ANU Press @anupress.bsky.social · 23d
With increasing globalisation and convergence in securities markets, regulatory cooperation is increasingly relevant.

This book proposes a deeper, strategic collaboration between India and Australia in regard to the securities sector.

Get your copy today doi.org/10.22459/DSC...
ANU Press New Release. Cover image of Deeper, Strategic Collaboration in the Securities Sector: India and Australia
1 2

Reposted by: Jason Chin

anupress.bsky.social
With increasing globalisation and convergence in securities markets, regulatory cooperation is increasingly relevant.

This book proposes a deeper, strategic collaboration between India and Australia in regard to the securities sector.

Get your copy today doi.org/10.22459/DSC...
ANU Press New Release. Cover image of Deeper, Strategic Collaboration in the Securities Sector: India and Australia
3

Reposted by: Jason Chin, Dorothy Bishop

simongandevia.bsky.social
International Research Integrity Conference researchintegrityconf.com has been moved to University of Sydney (Refectory and Cullen rooms) Nov 16-18th 2025. Registrations filling fast
International Research Integrity Conference | 16-18 November 2025, Sydney, Australia
researchintegrityconf.com
1 3

Reposted by: Jason Chin

aimosinc.bsky.social
AIMOS is pleased to make the following submission regarding the Australian Research Council's consultation draft for its new research evaluation framework: osf.io/mpvbc
OSF
osf.io
2 3

Reposted by: Jason Chin

pppl-journal.bsky.social
CALL FOR APPLICATIONS:

PPPL 2026 Editorial Board
Deadline: October 1, 2025

Find editorial board position descriptions, required qualifications, & how to apply here: osf.io/fcmvj

We're also seeking 2 early career editorial fellows, find more info here: osf.io/9ebrm

#psychlaw #lawpsych
4 2

Reposted by: Jason Chin

pppl-journal.bsky.social
Does the Considering Offender Probability in Statements (COPS) Scale allow law enforcement to distinguish between guilty and innocent people placing 911 homicide calls?

Research from the FBI BAU and Villanova University suggests it does not.

Read a summary from the authors: bit.ly/3DgM3dL
Picture of a hand holding a phone and dialing 911. Below, text reads "Studies from the FBI and Villanova University find that the Considering Offender Probability Statements (COPS) Scale fails to reliably discriminate between guilty and innocent 911 callers".
2 4 3

by Jason Chin — Reposted by: Rachel Killean

jasonchin.bsky.social
This recent article in the official journal of the Aus. Academy of Forensic Sciences includes hallucinated references. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10...., for example:
2 1 4

Reposted by: Jason Chin

metaror.bsky.social
🔒Our latest study regards "the effect of APC waivers on the participation of Ukrainian researchers in fully Gold OA journals".

The reviewers call it "well-developed", "timely" & "important" while questioning the focus on only 5 publishers.

👇Read the assessment, reviews & author response on MetaROR
The effect of APC discounts on Ukraine's participation in gold open access journals
metaror.org
1 3 4

Reposted by: Jason Chin

aimosinc.bsky.social
The call for proposals is now up for our long awaited #AIMOS2025 conference in Sydney this November:
aimos-inc.github.io/aimos.confer...
1 15 17

Reposted by: Jason Chin

rorinstitute.bsky.social
Call for Proposals: Metascience 2025

Be part of the biggest Metascience meeting yet! We're inviting proposals for:
✅ Virtual symposia
✅ In-person panels
✅ Talks & posters

⏰ Submit by 7 Feb 2025
🔗 Full details: metascience.info/call-for-pro...
Call for Proposals - Metascience
The call for proposals for Metascience 2025 is open with a deadline of 7 February 2025.
metascience.info
28 43

Reposted by: Jason Chin

natrevpsychol.nature.com
Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts

Review by Kristy A. Martire, Tess M. S. Neal, Fernand Gobet, Jason M. Chin, Jonathan F. Berengut & Gary Edmond

Web: go.nature.com/4ig3zhE
PDF: rdcu.be/edUS3

#psychology #psychscisky
1 6 20

Reposted by: Jason Chin

ludowaltman.bsky.social
Academic publishing is a multibillion-dollar industry. It’s not always good for science theconversation.com/academic-pub...
Academic publishing is a multibillion-dollar industry. It’s not always good for science
Some academic publishers have been accused by scientists of being “too greedy” and prioritising profit over research integrity.
theconversation.com
1 6 18

Reposted by: Jason Chin, Adrian Barnett

jabyrnesci.bsky.social
International #ResearchIntegrity conference taking place in beautiful Sydney Australia on 16-18 November 2025 🐨 🌏
Great speakers including @elisabethbik.bsky.social @jdwilko.bsky.social @jasonchin.bsky.social
For more info contact
@simongandevia.bsky.social 🧪
simongandevia.bsky.social
Simon Gandevia @simongandevia.bsky.social · May 14
International Research Integrity Conference. I am arranging this in Sydney in November 16-18th 2025. researchintegrityconf.com Note the excellent speaker list. Contact me!
International Research Integrity Conference | 17-18 November 2025, Sydney, Australia
researchintegrityconf.com
1 15 26

Reposted by: Jason Chin, Marek Kwiek

metaror.bsky.social
We're happy to announce MetaROR has joined Bluesky!

We're a community-owned platform for open peer review in metaresearch. Using the innovative Publish-Review-Curate model, we're transforming how metaresearch is published & reviewed, making the process faster and more open.

Find us on metaror.org
15 23

Reposted by: Jason Chin, Adrian Barnett

dorassessment.bsky.social
Innovations in #ScholarlyCommunication and #ResponsibleResearchAssessment need to go hand in hand. New guest post by @jasonchin.bsky.social, @ludowaltman.bsky.social, and Kathryn Zeiler, editors at @metaror.bsky.social, share insights on these connections. Read more👇
sfdora.org/2025/07/08/m...
Judging research on its own merits: How MetaROR supports better research assessment | DORA
MetaResearch Open Review (MetaROR), and other publish-review-curate platforms (e.g., Copernicus, eLife, F1000, Open Research Europe, Peer Community In) challenge the current state of scholarly publish...
sfdora.org
9 11

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
RFK relies on conflicts of interest to discredit research finding vaccines are safe. I guess the decades of metascience and watchdog work on conflicts of interest are to blame for his weaponisation of this concept?
www.politico.com/news/2025/06...
Democrats challenged RFK Jr. on vaccines. Fireworks ensued.
The health secretary resurfaced anti-vaccine claims at a House hearing, alleging collusion by pharma companies, public health experts and politicians to mask the truth.
www.politico.com
3

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/st... (source)
Unsticking Litigation Science | Science and Technology Law Review
journals.library.columbia.edu
1 2

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
Happy to have a chat with you over email or Zoom, but I don't think you're correct here (I study Daubert and other reliability standards). Generally, I think you are mixing up admissibility and proof. And you might be surprised that courts haven't been very interested in the 'crisis' narrative:
1 4

Reposted by: Jason Chin

aimosinc.bsky.social
AIMOS stands against the recent U.S. Executive Order, 'Restoring Gold Standard Science'. docs.google.com/document/d/1...
6 6

by Brian A. Nosek — Reposted by: Jason Chin, James Q. Wilson

briannosek.bsky.social
Complementing other communications about the "Restoring Gold Standard Science" Executive Order, here is a statement from COS. Also, see the links to stories from previous attempts to co-opt open science for policies that undermine science and evidence-based policymaking.

www.cos.io/about/news/c...
COS Statement on “Restoring Gold Standard Science” Executive Order
The Executive Order issued on May 23, 2025, Restoring Gold Standard Science, references several open science practices championed by COS and the open science and metascience communities more generally...
www.cos.io
2 29 48

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
I guess because he doesn't know. I don't know either, but my prior is that they are mostly very solid.

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
Why do you have to assume the worst of people you disagree with? I'm biased as well, but unless I'm completely disengaged from reality, there seems to be a very plausible interpretation of his statement in which he's just trying to be epistemically modest about what he knows about those fields.
1 1

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
Yes! I wrote about this here. rdo-olr.org/improving-ex...
Improving Expert Evidence: The Role of Open Science and Transparency - Ottawa Law Review
Volume 50, Issue 2 https://rdo-olr.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/OLR-50-2-05-Chin-Final.pdf “]
rdo-olr.org

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
Signed!
standupforscience.bsky.social
Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.bsky.social · May 26
🚨 URGENT RESPONSE CALL 🚨

Trump’s Fool’s Gold Science EO is a dangerous sham.
It gives his appointees the power to dismiss entire bodies of research and punish researchers who fail to fall in line with his agenda.

We’ve launched an open letter.

SIGN & SHARE NOW: actionnetwork.org/petitions/op...
Sign The Open Letter to Stand Up For Science Now!
Science is under siege. Trump’s latest Executive Order calls for politically appointed science commissars to evaluate research. Join us in adding your name to our open letter condemning Trump’s escala...
actionnetwork.org
2

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
there were not many, but there were some others, as well as random calls from charities. I can't remember the names, but could look it up. One operated out of George Mason Uni.

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
Again, on my read, I've had exactly the same experience at multiple private funders.
1

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
Yes, I've had the same thing happen to me. Sometimes no response, sometimes an e-mail as you describe, sometimes something very hopeful asking for more information and then no response when I send it. The public funders are at least more accountable, but still lots of wasted time. Agreed - it's bad.
1

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
I hope readers of Science will find the open peer review on MetaROR!

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
You might note here that this was subjected to transparent peer review, with an assessment that was quite critical: metaror.org/kotahi/artic...
1

by Jason Chin

jasonchin.bsky.social
I'm sorry this happened to you, but I don't know if it was personal. In my experience, this is just how funding works. I've probably been turned down over 50 times with various levels of dismissiveness and wasting-of-my-timingness.
1

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m