Scholar

Sven De Mæyer

H-index: 33
Education 61%
Psychology 15%

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

emptywheel.bsky.social
Generally not a fan of Nicholas Kristof but he's a sound person to track the deaths that Elon claims haven't occurred on his watch.

www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
Achol Deng, an 8-year-old girl, was also infected with H.I.V. at birth and likewise remained alive because of American assistance. Then in January, Achol lost her ID card, and there was no longer a case worker to help get her a new card and medicines; she too became sick and died, said Labani.

Yes, this may eventually save money for United States taxpayers. How much? The cost of first-line H.I.V. medications to keep a person alive is less than 12 cents a day.

I asked Labani if he had ever heard of Musk. He had not, so I explained that Musk is the world’s wealthiest man and has said that no one is dying because of U.S.A.I.D. cuts.

“That is wrong,” Labani said, sounding surprised that anyone could be so oblivious. “He should come to grass roots.”

Another household kept alive by American aid was that of Jennifer Inyaa, a 35-year-old single mom, and her 5-year-old son, Evan Anzoo, both of them H.I.V.-positive. Last month, after the aid shutdown, Inyaa became sick and died, and a week later Evan died as well, according to David Iraa Simon, a community health worker who assisted them. Decisions by billionaires in Washington quickly cost the lives of a mother and her son.
apache.be
“In de stad schuilt een ander soort democratische politiek die meer aandacht verdient”, stelt socioloog @stijnoosterlynck.bsky.social.

Oosterlynck laat de stem van de stad vandaag horen in de twintigste Paul Verbraekenlezing.
Socioloog Stijn Oosterlynck: “De stad wijst ons de weg”
De socioloog zoekt voor zijn Paul Verbraekenlezing in de stad naar een democratische toekomst.
apache.be

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

einsteinberlin.bsky.social
🏆 Research integrity consultant and image forensics expert @elisabethbik.bsky.social has uncovered fraudulent data in over 7,600 scientific papers and exposed the practices of ‘paper mills’ that produce counterfeit scientific articles. She is honoured with the €200K Individual Award. Congrats!

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

datavisfriendly.bsky.social
#TodayinHistory #dataviz #OTD 📊
💀Feb 23, 1855 Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss died in Göttingen, Germany 🇩🇪

In 1821 he proved least squares as best linear unbiased estimator& illustrated this with data on the French meridian arcs, from Dunkirk to Barcelona.
Scientific problems stimulated discoveries

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

sashelton.bsky.social
Check out "A Layering of Selves: Bias, Subjectivity, and Paper Dolls," a more #creative and #fun way for #qualitative #students to explore #subjectivity, #positionality, & #bias. FREE access:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... #highered #research #PhDSky #AcademicSky #HigherEdSky #methodology
Figure 1. Stephanie’s (Left) and April’s (Right) Paper Dolls From Initial Play. This paper examines the ways that artful inquiry affords qualitative research students
newly creative and embodied opportunities to understand and engage with subjectivity
and bias—important concepts in the eld of qualitative inquiry. Moving beyond the
inadequacy of traditional teaching practices, such as student-generated written sub-
jectivity statements, we share here an artful methodological approach using paper dolls
to disrupt conventional engagements with these concepts. Inspired by Donna
Haraway’s emphasis on layer(ing)s of subjectivity and Karen Barad’s discussion of
cutting together-apart as a creative process, we draw from collaging in/as research to
offer this paper doll activity as a constructive and disruptive way to invite students to
consider themselves as complex, messy, and inevitable aspects of the research process.

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

rebeccasear.bsky.social
“Curry’s letter describes “an assault on scientific research…huge cuts in funding & regime of censorship (particularly with regard to equity, diversity & inclusion & climate) that is a direct threat to freedom of expression & academic freedom. These actions contravene the society’s code of conduct”
Royal Society will meet amid campaign to revoke Elon Musk’s fellowship
More than 1,300 scientists have signed a letter calling on the world’s oldest science society to reassess the billionaire’s membership following cuts to US science.
www.nature.com
pvpeteg.bsky.social
🎙️ De Staat van ons Onderwijs over Zelfregulerend leren
Hoe ondersteun je als docent studenten bij hun zelfregulerend leren? Ik spreek met Sabrina Govaerts & Astrid Koelman (Kenniscentrum OLLI, AP Hogeschool) over hun tool voor docenten HO.
🎧 Luister hier: www.mixcloud.com/peter-vp/de-...
De Staat Van Ons Onderwijs Over Zelfregulerend Leren In Het Hoger Onderwijs
www.mixcloud.com

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

repro4everyone.bsky.social
I#LoveMethodsWeek25 is happening this year! We are hosting a workshop!
Sign up for our workshop here: https://buff.ly/40SG1Jn
Check out other events here: https://buff.ly/40Axc5u

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

lakens.bsky.social
Which findings should we replicate? Isager et al propose a 'replication value', defined as the maximum expected utility gain when conducting a replication. It is a function of (1) the value of being certain about the claim, and (2) uncertainty about the claim. osf.io/preprints/me...
svawa.bsky.social
Very interesting paper on the double-blind peer-review system!

I am curious about your thoughts on this topic
predatoryjournals.org
🔍 Is double-blind peer review really the gold standard for scientific integrity? Christopher Mebane argues it may actually obscure bias and data, risking the rigor of research. Transparency, he claims, is key to safeguarding science. 🧪 #ScienceIntegrity #PeerReview

doi.org/10.1093/etoj...
Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity
Abstract. I make six arguments for why double-blind peer review practices increase vulnerability to scientific integrity lapses over more transparent peer
doi.org

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

predatoryjournals.org
🔍 Is double-blind peer review really the gold standard for scientific integrity? Christopher Mebane argues it may actually obscure bias and data, risking the rigor of research. Transparency, he claims, is key to safeguarding science. 🧪 #ScienceIntegrity #PeerReview

doi.org/10.1093/etoj...
Double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity
Abstract. I make six arguments for why double-blind peer review practices increase vulnerability to scientific integrity lapses over more transparent peer
doi.org

Reposted by: Sven De Mæyer

psforscher.bsky.social
You may have heard of Questionable Research Practices and "HARKing" as threats to replicability.

In a new paper led by @sakshighai.bsky.social, we argue that a similar practices -- Questionable Generalizability Practices and "MASKing" -- undermine generalizability.

www.nature.com/articles/s44...
markrubin.bsky.social
Three Myths About Statistical Power

🔹️ Myth 1: Power is an objective feature

🔹️ Myth 2: With low power comes low credibility

🔹️ Myth 3: High power protects against questionable research practices

BSky author: @clauslamm.bsky.social
Powerful Myths: Common Misconceptions About Statistical Power
Lukas Lengersdorff and Claus Lamm discuss three misconceptions that stand in the way of an informed discussion.
www.psychologicalscience.org
svawa.bsky.social
I think this assumption of infinite populations is not in there. In your model you can assume variation between stimuli regardless of there is a finite or infinite population of stimuli. I might be wrong of course. Moreover, inference works different there, not relying on estimated standard errors
svawa.bsky.social
What would happen in the Bayesian realm? To be clear, I do not know myself nor did I wrap my head around it. Just a spontaneous thought.
svawa.bsky.social
Zeer boeiende bijdrage. Heb hier opnieuw wat uit opgestoken.
pvpeteg.bsky.social
🌍 Hoe maak je jongeren weerbaar tegen klimaat-nepnieuws? In deze aflevering van 'De Staat van ons Onderwijs' bespreek ik met Leen Bisschop #OdiseeHogeschool hoe wetenschappelijke geletterdheid en reflectieve dialogen jongeren helpen kritisch te denken.
🎧 Luister nu!
www.mixcloud.com/peter-vp/de-...
De Staat Van Ons Onderwijs Over Weerbaarheid Tegenover Nepnieuws Over Klimaatverandering
www.mixcloud.com

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m