A. Suárez Mascareño
banner
asuarezmascareno.com
A. Suárez Mascareño
@asuarezmascareno.com

Astronomy postdoc at the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias (IAC, Spain). Hunting low mass exoplanets. Member of the ESPRESSO, NIRPS, HARPS-3, ANDES, and CHORUS, science teams. Co-PI of the IACSAT-1.

Physics 87%
Engineering 10%
Just because

About to start a week-long workshop about the ongoing collaboration between China and Spain on high resolution spectroscopy 🔭

Lately I've been working with FEROS data. 0/10. Not recommended 🔭
Buen día para recuperar el póster DE VERDAD de Wicked

It appears I had more than 30k emails in my inbox. Some might consider that a tad excessive. But don't worry, only 3500 are unread.

Today I got a somewhat annoyed email from our IT department telling me I'm not allowed to keep saving all those 2020 attachments I have already forgotten about in my email server. Now I am forced to remove all those paper drafts and ESO observing logs from 4-5 years ago.

This is certainly happening in astronomy. Over my (not long) career I have seen a change in how data is treated. In particular public data. Nowadays there are a lot of rules of how to use it and who should be invited to use public data. 10-12 years ago I remember just inviting PIs if we liked them

Its no yet 1000/pub but getting several tens or up to 100 is now very easy

In observational astronomy I think It is very hard to keep short author lists while trying to be fair to the people that planned and performed the observations. In those i'm involved (as lead or co) It is very normal to use a minimum of 4-5 sources of data, each of them with their own policy
saturation with Tolkien spinoffs has somehow not prepared our culture for the arrival of dark lords bearing a gift that everyone becomes convinced they can wield to accomplish great things but just makes them dependent and start whispering about preciouses if you suggest just throwing it away

Since he started with the seizures and the medication in late july, Karateka has been quite clumsy and wouldn't climb any high place. Today when I came back from work I found this ❤️

Big statement by the TMT team. Doesn't mean It will actually happen, but I think I've never seen the consortium consider the possibility in such explicit way 🔭

The visit continues. Today i'm back at the Observatory of Geneva after more than 6 years.

I'm visiting Geneva for a NIRPS project meeting and so far I've been indulging in some nostalgic vacation. I went to check on my old apartment, and visited two of the same restaurants I used to go when I lived here

It's a tough time for cautionary tales, as rich assholes have the means to see how they benefit and make them come true
Genetically Engineered Babies Are Banned. Tech Titans Are Trying to Make One Anyway.
Silicon Valley startups are pushing the boundaries of reproductive genetics, hoping to prevent diseases as well as improve chances for a high IQ and other traits.
www.wsj.com

I shouldn't need to hide stuff that opens a path to a future potentially important result because senior scientists cannot keep their cool for a while (or few years, in this case).

I would assume listening to me about the shortcomings of my own work would be a good idea. That should be considered a lower limit of shortcomings. They should assume more shortcomings than those I explicitly and preemptively explain, not less.

Ugg... I never learn... I do something potentially cool and send it to a collaborator saying "ok, so this are the results with the current data, but I have no control over biases. We need XX additional more data to be sure". And I always get the response of OMG WE SUBMIT TO NATURE RIGHT NOW
a man with a beard is touching his forehead with his hands
ALT: a man with a beard is touching his forehead with his hands
media.tenor.com

At outreach events, they take much better pictures than at most conferences. Maybe just add a couple € to the register fee to pay a photographer for three-four days.
I wrote a textbook!

I hope you like it.

store.ioppublishing.org/page/detail/...

At least I like the presentation I've made lol now off to get dinner

Sometimes I say yes to stuff that seems exciting (e.g. presenting in an outreach festival) and then I realized really should have said no (e.g. when I'm preparing my presentation on a Saturday evening).

Likely the silliest use of decades high precision radial velocity measurements

Soon, we will need to get high-schoolers to write the papers, to make sure they have 5-10 when they start their MsC...

At my institute we reached a point in which without a first-author paper it is almost impossible to enter the PhD program. I think it's absurd.

After analysing 29 years of RV observations, we find that Calpamos likely does not exist, which also means LV-426 probably doesn’t either. The reported transmission from Zeta² Reticuli never happened, and the Nostromo never picked it up. Meaning Ripley, finally, gets to go home #exoplanets 🔭

Can more massive planets still hide if the system? Only if it was face-on, which we find unlikely. Combining the measured v sin i (Santos et al. 2004) with our rotation period gives an inclination of ≈45°, which rules out planets more massive than 2.4–23 Me #exoplanets 🔭

What about other planets? We applied state of the art techniques to evaluate the presence of any additional signal in the data, finding nothing. In fact, we could establish that no planets with m sin i larger than 2-20 Me (depending on period) are present in the system. #exoplanets 🔭

We found no signal at the proposed period, but set a strong upper limit. An amplitude of ≤57 cm/s. For a 10 MJ planet to appear so small, it would need an inclination < 0.13°. Based on the statistics of the inclination of stellar axes, it has probability between 10⁻⁵ and 10⁻⁷. #exoplanets 🔭

The main challenge: could Calpamos really exist within this data? With data of such a low scatter it was clear that if the orbit was edge-on it cannot exist. But what about with less favorably alignments? #exoplanets 🔭