Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn
@anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
190 followers 79 following 980 posts
Botanist, taxonomist, phylogeneticist.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Easy to smile at this, but to be fair, I think there should be better consumer protections against accidentally and unknowingly running up large cell phone bills and suchlike.
cait.bsky.social
guy in a legal advice reddit wants to know how to get out of paying google the money he owes them after vibe coding one of his apps into running 40 times a second for several days straight, but says it's not his fault bc they should have stopped him by making it harder to use
r/LegalAdviceUK u/ShavedAp3 • 3d
Join
Google want to charge me 7 k for API access what can I do as they are denying appeals
Debt & Money
Hi there and thanks for reading.
I tried to keep this brief and just ended up rambling on trying to get as much in as possible so here is my edited hopefully a lot smaller problem.
Google are charging me 7k for a mistake that I told them about within a day, the bill went from about £45 to 16k in a day! when I asked for help I was told "dont worry well reset it as a one off, you'll need to put measures in place and ill guide you through those after you agree" So i did he then said "I will monitor it for a further 24 - 48 hours and then tell you how to put the measures in place. " Less than 24 hours later the bill was now 23k and I found out how to stop it myself. Then came the long back and forth to get it reset.
Fast forward 5 months they have finally given me a 20k credit but with VAT the total bill at the time of the credit was 27k
The 20k would have cleared the costs at the time of making them aware they claim its both our responsibilities to monitor costs I feel I did that by contacting them as soon as I saw the irregularity.
I asked them to reconsider they said no the appeal has said that is their final offer so 1 now owe 7k.
Is there anything I can do here from a legal standpoint. I don't have 7k I barely have £45.
Thanks for reading I am in England if it helps. Intentional or not, OP used either 36k (16 + 20) or 43k (16 + 27) of API credit. Obviously what API it is matters, but with google maps, 16k would equate to ten million pulls. Or two hundred thousand Gemini 2.5 calls with 1000 token input and 5k token output.
Those aren't numbers that something running correctly should run up for any average person or company. So either google screwed up something (which is unlikely that it would only happen to one person in the entire network) or OP has some app or something which isn't running properly and is sending too much to the API.
Edit: It was OP's app, polling google maps nearly 40 times a second for days.

tom_watts • 3d
According to other posts he ended up polling Google maps direction API 2300 times per minute for a few days. Looks like a combination of OP not knowing coding and asking ChatGPT to do it for him, and potentially Google's backend doing something weird in interpreting the janky code.
•••
146 ShavedAp3 OP • 3d
Even if that was the case and it wasn't the sign up process doesn't have the documentation I refer to.
Funnily enough though asking an LLM to help me find it still took some digging after it did.
If you work in the field im sure its easy but those just tinkering or learning not so much.
If google didnt want people like me using it they could make it far harder to do so, they could have hard limits in place for sole users to prevent stuff like this and so many other things.
Should they well clearly they don't think so and no doubt you agree that doesn't make it the right opinion it just makes it yours.
• • •
4
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Beetles are neat. Just look at the little dude!
A tiny carpet beetle photographed with a 200x macro lens. The body is covered in black, brown, and white scales, and it has the cutest little club-shaped antennas.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Have played around with Ollama for a work project and found (a) it works without a GPU, (b) it is SLOW, like >5 min for most queries, and (c) many models just don't work very well. I assume they are more compact versions compared to the ones you get via API. So, it works, but not very useful.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
The primary ethical issue for me isn't that I see lots of people losing work or having their salaries suppressed (are they?) but the providers earning subscription fees off Grand Theft IP. And judges and politicians just shrug after throwing the book at teens copying video games, Aaron Swartz, etc.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
The LLM makers may well want to crush labour, but outside of art, it doesn't seem to work well enough for that. The viable use cases appear to be slop art (including p**n), spam websites and books, Google but worse, low-stakes coding assistance, cheating on homework, and chatting with it.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
This is also the appropriate response to the simpletons who say, I just want the news, without political bias. Even if someone were able to cover a student protest in completely unbiased language, they chose to cover a student protest instead of covering, say, lack of funding for health services.
volts.wtf
All I want in life is to persuade everyone, when encountering politics & culture, to ask, "why are we talking about this?" I mean that very literally: anything you encounter on your screens reflects a choice. Someone covered that, talked about that, rather than the many other things out there. Why?
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
I wish people would become half as alarmed about large parts of the planet becoming uninhabitable and/or unsuitable for food production as they are about I watched Terminator as a child and it scared me.

CO2 emissions aren't even decreasing; full steam ahead.

www.statista.com/statistics/2...
Global CO2 emissions by year 1940-2024| Statista
Annual global carbon dioxide emissions have increased by more than 60 percent since 1990 and are now at their highest ever levels.
www.statista.com
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
But first and foremost, there is the usual discrepancy between what articles like this one claim "AI" (LLMs, really) can do and how inept they are whenever I use them. And they aren't creative; if they can "design a virus", it is because the information how to do that is already out there anyway.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
As a biologist (although admittedly not a bioweapons designer), I find it frustrating how easy people think designing life is, as if it is legos or something. Even if "AI" makes the design process more efficient, you'd still need a lab, and I guarantee that there would be lengthy trial-and-error.
mclem.org
“In September, scientists at Stanford reported they had used A.I. to design a virus for the first time.”
Opinion | The A.I. Prompt That Could End the World
www.nytimes.com
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Word cloud (wordclouds.com) of the identification keys to the tribes and genera of Asteraceae in the online Flora of North America. No surprise to see heads (capitula), cypselas, and phyllaries being prominent; perhaps also no surprise with "sometimes" and "usually" 😂.
Circular word cloud with very many words of different sizes, too many to list. Most prominent are: sometimes, usually, heads, phyllaries, cypselae, leaves, pappi, arrays, part, and corollas.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Also, if there was a sentient super-AI, owning or controlling it would be slavery, but that is a different issue than whether super-AI would create a 'consumer cornucopia'.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Many people conflate capitalism with democracy, markets (which existed long before capitalism), and/or private ownership of 'stuff'. But capitalism is specifically private ownership of the means of production plus free, salaried employees. AI makes the latter obsolete = no capitalism.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Fourth, and second-most obviously, a system where all goods and services are effectively free to produce could not be capitalism anymore. It could be communism if the people communally owned the super-AI or cyberpunk neo-feudalist dystopia if a few billionaires control it, but not capitalism.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Third, and most obviously, while the likes of Andreessen control the means of production, they would not allow goods and services to be priced at near zero. (Here is also the misunderstanding of the labour theory of value: it is about value, not about prices set by a monopolist exerting his power.)
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Second, how would even super-AI even in theory remove all labour, from mining tin ore to changing nappies? It thinks very hard, and suddenly supermarket shelves are stocked and batteries are installed? But again, in fairness, that may be why Andreessen called it a 'fallacy'.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
First, it is interesting to note that we here have a far-right billionaire entrepreneur endorsing the Marxist labour theory of value: the value of goods is determined by the labour required to create them. No labour = no value. Interesting because that theory is usually rejected by the right.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
This is making the rounds, and it bugs me.

In fairness, part of what he said was that everybody being jobless is a 'fallacy', so that the alternative scenario of 'consumer cornucopia' is seemingly not even his own expectation. Still, he says if AI did make everybody unemployed, that would be great.
edzitron.com
He said this in January lol
A world in which human wages crash from AI -- logically, necessarily -- is a world in which productivity growth goes through the roof, and prices for goods and services crash to near zero. Consumer cornucopia. Everything you need and want for pennies.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Amazing to contrast these lived experiences with the "free enterprise is efficient" and "business leaders wouldn't do anything wasteful" and "billionaire CEOs deserve their status" ideology that we are all immersed in every day.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Deleted half a year's worth of emails, brought the storage down from 93% full to 91%

Yippee
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
No, if you want to be a Serious Person, what you do is you decry everybody who foresees something happening as a crazy alarmist, and then when it has happened, you immediately accept it as normal.
Reposted by Alexander Schmidt-Lebuhn
botana-bedoya.bsky.social
One week to apply before reviews start for the postdoc I am offering investigating the tempo and pattern of river connections with the closure of the isthmus of Panama and its impact on river plant (Podostemaceae) migration. Genomic+fossil+geological data + fieldwork 👇
botana-bedoya.bsky.social
I am recruiting a postdoc to work for 2-3 yrs on our NSF-funded project aiming to investigate plant migration and river connectivity with the closure of the Isthmus of Panama. Leading publications, fieldwork in CR & Panama, applying and expanding phylo. & pop.gen tools👇

www.nybg.org/about/work-w...
Employment | New York Botanical Garden
Find out what employment opportunities are available at The New York Botanical Garden.
www.nybg.org
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
I once had to stop a colleague from using "South Coast" to describe the range of a species in a manuscript intended for an international journal, whose readers would have assumed he was referring to an actual south coast, as if words have meanings and are intended for communication. Those naifs.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
Nothing tops New South Wales in Australia. Many locals consider nearly all of the eastern half of the state to be "Western New South Wales", because it is west of Sydney. And the eastern coast of Australia north and south of Sydney are the "North Coast" and the "South Coast", respectively.
spavel.bsky.social
Pittsburgh edging the Midwest doesn't seem right somehow.
williamhazen.bsky.social
This is the most accurate depiction of the Midwest to date. Wichita has always felt like the last Midwest city while also being the first plains city.
anschmidtlebuhn.bsky.social
The fork lift driver who collapsed the storage shelves and injured several of his colleagues must have had a cunning five-dimensional plan, there is no other explanation.

Wait, no, he isn't a billionaire, so in that case, everybody can see the obvious. Silly me.