Bartosz Bartkowski
banner
bartoszbartk.com
Bartosz Bartkowski
@bartoszbartk.com

Environmental economist | land use🚜🌱 / soils🪱 / biodiversity🪲 | behaviour & policy | social–ecological modelling | ast prof at @ufz.de & @unihalle.bsky.social | tea addict🫖 | jazz afficionado🎷 | born at 352 ppm | posts in 🇩🇪 🇬🇧 🇵🇱
https://bartoszbartk.com .. more

Environmental science 40%
Economics 21%
Pinned
Really, really happy to share this new publication by Malin Gütschow and myself on farmers’ identity in the context of multifunctionality 🚜🌾🪲🐦

link.springer.com/article/10.1...

A 🧵

Congrats!

I know. It's one of the (many) social norms in Germany that I am pretty sceptical of😉

But why wine (alcoholic or not)?😭

Seriously: I think beyond alcohol specifically, an underlying problem is the urge to gift something to someone you don't really know – so you have no idea whether the gift, no matter how generic, fits. In such situations, I'd say no gift is preferrable.

Me too. Makes me feel less bad when I don't give people anything😉

I did, not so long ago, despite giving way fewer presentation that you😉 Small n in either case, I guess.

If it weren't, I wouldn't have sent it out😉

This German „Anstoßen“ tradition is a whole another issue (for me at least). Short version: I hate it😉

At the same time, I'm too polite (or shy?) to outright reject such gifts or even say that they are of no use.

I've never drunken alcohol (unless having a trial sip counts), so I'm fine with people being surprised/asking questions, because I know it's unusual. But I'm annoyed by people giving me wine or even chocolates with alcohol without considering that this could be a problem.

Could we please denormalize giving gifts that contain alcohol to people you don't know well?! I'm not drinking alcohol by choice, but there are sober alcoholics out there...

(P.S. I'm actually in favour of denormalizing alcohol consumption in general, but that's less likely to meet with support 🤷🏻‍♂️)

Yeah, there's frustration on both sides...

Everyone who publishes does, implicitly

I totally agree with the point about exploitation. What I wanted to say is that to me, it's not really about "not getting paid". It's about publishers being essentially free riders on multiple public goods provided by/paid by academics and their funders.

Which is why I am trying to (also) target junior people with my invitations. And declines are the smaller problem – I'm particularly annoyed at the non-responses.

I have a problem with that "you don't get paid" bit. I consider it part of my (paid) academic job.

Also, I am not sure the publishers, who are the target of the "strike", are really hurt by it. To me it seems that it is hurting fellow researchers (especially junior ones) much more.

I see the point in publishers making money off of us in a sense. But at the same time, I consider reviewing part of my job🤷🏻‍♂️
Recently did around 30 requests to ppl who'd published very similar papers to the one I needed reviews for. 3 declines, 25 no response. Please at least decline guys it slows stuff down so much otherwise.
I'm still relatively new to this journal associate editor business, but it already sucks… I've had a paper on my desk for more than a month now:

Reviewers invited: 12
Of those…
Declined: 5
No response: 7

But they are authors as well, complaining that their own submissions take so long… It's ultimately about indirect reciprocity.
I'm still relatively new to this journal associate editor business, but it already sucks… I've had a paper on my desk for more than a month now:

Reviewers invited: 12
Of those…
Declined: 5
No response: 7

Who would have thought
🙂 Hey @bartoszbartk.com! You're leaning slightly toward the bright side. Your sentiment score is 0.01 (slightly positive). Nice to see you keeping things upbeat. Your followers probably appreciate it.

Reposted by Bartosz Bartkowski

🙂 Hey @bartoszbartk.com! You're leaning slightly toward the bright side. Your sentiment score is 0.01 (slightly positive). Nice to see you keeping things upbeat. Your followers probably appreciate it.

It's an all-lose game these days...

I just realized that the atmospheric CO2 concentration has increased by 70 ppm since I was born – that's about the same as the difference between my birth year's and pre-industrial levels...
“Even if fossil fuel emissions were eliminated immediately, emissions from the global food system alone would make it impossible to limit warming to 1.5°C and difficult even to realize the 2°C target…major changes in how food is produced [and consumed] are needed…”

Die Transformation einer wilden Zusammensetzung von Zutaten in einen veganen Bigos à la Bartosz ist vollbracht👨🏻‍🍳🥘

Can anyone tell me what the benefit is of a reference letter vis-à-vis a list of reference persons? The time investment in a quick call is probably only minimally higher than reading the letter, the potential employer can receive much more info, and it's less hassle for applicant & reference person.
I found an interesting scientific position that I would have liked to apply for (not in academia). But they require THREE letters of reference along with the application if you are an applicant who has not yet completed their PhD, which is just crazy.

Wenn das der Standard ist, kann ich auch was beisteuern;-)

Reposted by Bartosz Bartkowski

I found an interesting scientific position that I would have liked to apply for (not in academia). But they require THREE letters of reference along with the application if you are an applicant who has not yet completed their PhD, which is just crazy.

Danke! Ja, um Gross kommt man in den Debatten um polnisch-jüdische Beziehungen nicht herum (im positiven Sinne), auch wenn ich seine Bücher bisher noch nicht gelesen habe (sondern nur Quellen, die sich auf sie beziehen).