godslayer
@bitdizzy.bsky.social
5.1K followers 640 following 58K posts
god’s favorite daughter (derogatory)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
bitdizzy.bsky.social
5 RULES OF BITDIZZY THOUGHT

1) defining yourself in opposition to something is a parasitic relationship

2) a heretic is better than an apostate is better than a convert

3) AIN’T NO WAR BUT HOLY WAR

4) i am a religious and political extremist

5) no amount of methamphetamine substitutes for sleep
bitdizzy.bsky.social
everything is circular except the fact that things happen anyway you have to thug it out
Reposted by godslayer
octopodeeznuts.bsky.social
the fun ones would be questions they don't realize they were taught the "correct" answers to by people who were still embedded in Christendom

i keep seeing anti-LLM stuff that sounds like it's rooted in a belief in souls, from people who ostensibly don't believe in souls
bitdizzy.bsky.social
you have a mind silly goose
bitdizzy.bsky.social
If your definitions are good then it will say a lot about who you are, what you believe in, and what you demand of others and offer of yourself to others.
bitdizzy.bsky.social
It could also be axiomatic. It could be a definition of evil from a definition of rationality, or vice versa. I would phrase your question as "can be scrutinized in more ways", but that also means "can explain things in more ways". whether or not it's coherent or useful is beside the point.
bitdizzy.bsky.social
concept: the adjoint triple AdjoinUnits ⊣ Forget Identities ⊣ IdempotentCompletion between Semicategories and Categories as a setting in which you can talk about absurdity and validity at the same time. You get to violate the yoneda lemma while still keeping track of coherent constructions!
bitdizzy.bsky.social
in the logical sense that it (at least seemingly) has more implications
bitdizzy.bsky.social
i believe questions can be haunted by sheitan and this is how things that aren't even ontological (does a question exist?) can kill all complex life on this planet
bitdizzy.bsky.social
you have to turn back on the question instead of being a thomist about it
bitdizzy.bsky.social
you have to turn back on the question instead of being a thomist about it
bitdizzy.bsky.social
i need to write down my synthesis of Tahwid and Sunyata based on the observation that "it would be evil if morality didn't exist" puts morality beyond ontology 😇
bitdizzy.bsky.social
they could embrace sunyata
bitdizzy.bsky.social
oh worm i should try spooking my doc
bitdizzy.bsky.social
> axioms

there is a circularity
bitdizzy.bsky.social
i should come up with questions that i think are stronger than "does god exist" and see which ones atheists take issue with and which they freely muse on
bitdizzy.bsky.social
i mean it is what it is the mind is already anomalous even for normoids what's another anomaly y'kno?
bitdizzy.bsky.social
i think "evil is irrational" is a stronger claim than the existence of god
bitdizzy.bsky.social
quantaloids and greedoids both sound like channer slurs for people who work for companies like Gold Man Sacks, but they are both respectable mathematical objects
bitdizzy.bsky.social
as far as i can tell, having reco'd it to people with normal physiology as well, unless you've won an inscrutable genetic lottery, creatine is at worst harmless and at best "waow."
bitdizzy.bsky.social
I fucking hate atlases and idempotents are mommy so i need math culture to get real cool until we never talk about them again
Remark 4.2. Lawvere comments on this fact as follows: “For example, if C is the category of all smooth maps between all open subsets of all Euclidean spaces, then C¯ [the Karoubi envelope] is the category of all smooth manifolds. This powerful theorem justifies bypassing the complicated considerations of charts, coordinate transformations, and atlases commonly offered as a ”basic“ definition of the concept of manifold. For example the 2-sphere, a manifold but not an open set of any Euclidean space, may be fully specified with its smooth structure by considering any open set A in 3-space E which contains it but not its center (taken to be 0) and the smooth idempotent endomap of A given by e(x)=x/|x|. All general constructions (i.e., functors into categories which are Cauchy complete) on manifolds now follow easily (without any need to check whether they are compatible with coverings, etc.) provided they are known on the opens of Euclidean spaces: for example, the tangent bundle on the sphere is obtained by splitting the idempotent e′ on the tangent bundle A×V of A (V being the vector space of translations of E) which is obtained by differentiating e. The same for cohomology groups, etc.”
bitdizzy.bsky.social
creatine works wonders for me tho btw
bitdizzy.bsky.social
"You have a metabolic-inflammatory disorder? Have you tried having no problems with metabolism or inflammation?"
bitdizzy.bsky.social
it's really sick and diseased that doctors keep trying to find god punishing the wicked in various organs
Reposted by godslayer
eigenvectrix.myatproto.social
Type 2 diabetes is not the “lifestyle” one. Doctors want that to be true. The media wants it to be true. I dislike myself, so it’s very easy to feel that it must be true in my case. But it isn’t.