David Wearing
@davidwearing.bsky.social
8.3K followers 2.3K following 1.4K posts
Assistant Professor in International Relations at the University of Sussex (own views, obviously). Interested in British (and Western) foreign relations in the Middle East and elsewhere, and how they're shaped by legacies of colonialism.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by David Wearing
davidwearing.bsky.social
None of us are safe in a world where basic norms in respect of the sanctity of human life are blithely disregarded. Those norms must be enforced, and enforced visibly. There must be political and legal consequences for every politician who made the genocide possible. The alternative is unthinkable.
saulstaniforth.bsky.social
The foreign secretary says the UK has been contributing to the peace process.

No. What the UK govt has been contributing to is the extermination of the Palestinian people.
Reposted by David Wearing
davidwearing.bsky.social
When centrists affirm and validate racist grievance politics - that refugees are a burden, that racists have "legitimate concerns" about refugees - they empower the far right to take steps like the below, which would be unthinkable had the underlying assumptions not been turned into a common sense.
sundersays.bsky.social
Restore Britain's convoluted way of calliing for Britain to take no refugees at all.

UK should only ever give refugee status to genuine asylum seekers from neighbouring countries, which, given every one of our neighbours is a safe country "would effectively mean scrapping our whole asylum system"
davidwearing.bsky.social
They're so bad on foreign policy
davidwearing.bsky.social
As far as I can see (and remember), the Tory view of the time was, "we'll tolerate you - despite your inferior origins - to the extent that you conform and assimilate".
davidwearing.bsky.social
But Omar, given that Thatcher was complaining of Britain being "swamped" by Commonwealth immigrants from a different "culture", how can we say that there was a consensus of the kind you describe? Never mind the Tebbit test and any number of other similar examples?
davidwearing.bsky.social
None of us are safe in a world where basic norms in respect of the sanctity of human life are blithely disregarded. Those norms must be enforced, and enforced visibly. There must be political and legal consequences for every politician who made the genocide possible. The alternative is unthinkable.
saulstaniforth.bsky.social
The foreign secretary says the UK has been contributing to the peace process.

No. What the UK govt has been contributing to is the extermination of the Palestinian people.
davidwearing.bsky.social
When centrists affirm and validate racist grievance politics - that refugees are a burden, that racists have "legitimate concerns" about refugees - they empower the far right to take steps like the below, which would be unthinkable had the underlying assumptions not been turned into a common sense.
sundersays.bsky.social
Restore Britain's convoluted way of calliing for Britain to take no refugees at all.

UK should only ever give refugee status to genuine asylum seekers from neighbouring countries, which, given every one of our neighbours is a safe country "would effectively mean scrapping our whole asylum system"
davidwearing.bsky.social
Thanks that's saved me watching it :)
davidwearing.bsky.social
Three representatives of the reactionary right, one centrist, and one person from the left. Not even the pretence of balance or journalistic professionalism from the BBC. Good luck to Polanski in this set up.
nickhartleygreen.bsky.social
The first time I’ve been looking forward to watch Question Time in quite a while!

Go on @zackpolanski.bsky.social!

#bbcqt
davidwearing.bsky.social
This is the point. There is no horizon for the Palestinians whatsoever in the "Trump plan", and no reliable, long-term commitment from the White House to restrain the genocidal regime. The new "peace" consists of far worse conditions than those that led to the events of the last two years.
yairwallach.bsky.social
Make no mistake. Those who spearheaded the Gaza genocide will try to relaunch it in a more ruthless manner, at the earliest opportunity.
They will fail only if there will be an alternative vision, one of recognition, life and equality for everyone.
davidwearing.bsky.social
The Qataris were part of a big push for a ceasefire from the Arab states, which formed much of the impetus for what's happening now, so yeah, they definitely want some credit for that.
davidwearing.bsky.social
As if "the Middle East" is the problem, and not us.
davidwearing.bsky.social
We will also hear a lot about Washington's "diplomatic achievement", a travesty of a framing. The US could have pulled the plug on Israel's genocide at any point over the past two years, and chose not to. The basis of a ceasefire has long been there, but Israel and its allies weren't interested.
davidwearing.bsky.social
The discourse in the West for the next few days will be e.g. "for all the caveats, let's just be relieved". And no, let's not. That's a feeling for Palestinians, not us.

Palestinians are human beings who deserve much better than the choice we've given them between genocide or colonial subjugation
davidwearing.bsky.social
Palestinians will feel understandable relief. The West should feel nothing but shame. Gaza has been obliterated. The territory rendered uninhabitable. Tens of thousands murdered in cold blood. The entire population subjected to starvation tactics. And now, colonial subjugation under Trump and Blair
davidwearing.bsky.social
Even the change to formally calling for a ceasefire was meaningless given that there was no "or else" attached. The arms and intel sharing continued to flow, no sanctions were applied. They were complicit throughout.
saulstaniforth.bsky.social
Jonathan Ashworth: "I've wanted to see a ceasefire for 2 years"

The collective position of the Labour shadow cabinet (which you were part of) for months after October 7th was to reject a ceasefire & Labour instructed its MPs not to vote for a ceasefire in Nov 2023.
Reposted by David Wearing
davidwearing.bsky.social
90% of Westminster-Fleet St discourse on the Gaza protests and the pro-Palestine movement more generally can be explained by the sheer desperation of guilty people to change the subject.
Reposted by David Wearing
davidwearing.bsky.social
Let's spell it out then. The motivation is
1/ empathy for our fellow human beings
2/ to raise the political cost of the British government's complicity to the point where London is forced to withdraw its support, thereby increasing the international pressure on Israel to cease its genocidal acts.
saulstaniforth.bsky.social
James Cleverly: "I cannot understand the motivation for protests of this type so regularly"
davidwearing.bsky.social
Man of integrity, which is no small thing
davidwearing.bsky.social
In this economy I will take whats good where I can find it tbh
davidwearing.bsky.social
A moderate technocrat with some surprisingly comrade tendencies, that one
Reposted by David Wearing
davidwearing.bsky.social
How on Earth did Goodwin get "radicalised" from the entirely moderate and non-racist Legitimate Concerns About The Rate Of Change In Communities to here in a mere ten years? A real mystery that has baffled many great minds.
huwcdavies.bsky.social
In what’s *not* racist this week: finding the growth of non-white populations ‘concerning’ or ‘disturbing’.