George Peretz KC
@georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
24K followers 2.1K following 2.9K posts
KC (E&W) BL (Irl): public/constitutional law, competition, subsidies, tax, trade. Chair of the Society of Labour Lawyers. Views mine and not those of Monckton Chambers.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Very good diagnosis of the ECHR debate here: and a key question as to how effectively to oppose the essentially vibes-based case against it (albeit with a veil of legitimacy from flimsy and bad faith, but apparently scholarly, publications by right wing think tanks with good media links).
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Calling law students interested in public law: the ALBA mooting competition is now under way. Details here. Academics/practitioners - please pass on. adminlaw.org.uk/event/the-ca...
The Catherine Callaghan Moot 2025 - ALBA
adminlaw.org.uk
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Theologians: discuss.
atrupar.com
Trump: "I want to be good because you want to prove to God so you go to that next step, right? So that's very important to me."
Reposted by George Peretz KC
paolosandro.bsky.social
Lord Wolfson's legal advice to Kemi Badenoch on ECHR withdrawal has now been published. In this thread I'll highlight a few passages that stood out for me - not meant to be a full analysis (in [] are the paragraph numbers). /1

rozenberg.substack.com/p/how-uk-cou...
How UK could leave ECHR
Withdrawal would allow EU to end criminal law enforcement co-operation
rozenberg.substack.com
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
I recently referred in a written argument to a passage in a chapter I wrote in a book edited by the judge hearing the matter. (It was on a minor and non-controversial point!)
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Quite
aoifemod.bsky.social
Ehm...

1) Because it is an integral part of the UK - not an overseas territority etcs., - & UK wide law applies to it

2) Direct Rule is always a possibility

3) Nice to the Conversative & Unionist Party looking for yet another sea border, as that is so popular.

See caj.org.uk/wp-content/u...
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
OK. Finding the mistakes and distortions can now begin.
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
NB too that Philp made it quite clear that there won’t be any “British Bill of Rights”: this is reactionary authoritarianism pure and simple.
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
3. “The ECHR commitment is only applicable to devolved bodies”. Wrong. The commitment is to incorporate into “NI law”, including NI law made and administered by UK institutions. (And given that UK institutions were responsible for the concerns, any other result would be bizarre.)
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
2. “The ECHR commitment is only to have rights ‘like’ the ECHR”. Wrong: there is no basis for saying that the agreement to incorporate “the ECHR” in NI law can be read as meaning “something the UK thinks is a bit like the ECHR”.
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Chris Philp on R4 yesterday making 3 false statements about the ECHR and the GFA.
1. “The ECHR is mentioned only in the Multi-Party Agreement not the UK/Ireland Agreement.”. Wrong: the latter agreement requires the UK to support the former: they can’t be pulled apart like that.
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
I suspect that tedious but necessary work once the Wolfson “legal advice” is released will be to go through it and find other obvious errors and distortions.
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Neither mother nor grandmother …
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
(As it happens I’m not Jewish: but Americans - unlike most non-Jewish Brits - recognise that my surname is Jewish.)
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Knowing who your real enemies are is generally wise.
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
My own reaction to this is that the only time I’ve been subject to an anti-Semitic pile-on was on the Musk site. When I rejected the idea of “two-tier justice”: I was entertained by US adherents of the idea that Jews were behind the Great Replacement, with pictures in case I didn’t read English.
sundersays.bsky.social
This Israeli government decision to host Tommy Robinson will widen the growing gulf between the Netanyahu government and the British public, including the broad majority of Jews in Britain (3/4 of whom dsapproved of Netanyahu, before this new link to this anti-Muslim racist UK far right convict).
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
“Entirely mediated by English interests” is generous. As Edward Carson said in 1921:

“What a fool I was. I was only a puppet, and so was Ulster, and so was Ireland, in the political game that was to get the Conservative Party into power.”

Some things never change.
colinmurray.bsky.social
Look, nothing will get picked up of this car crash beyond Badenoch's howler over NI supposedly supporting Brexit, but read on, and her take on NI is entirely mediated by English interests. On the Legacy Act the only constituency that matters to her is army veterans:

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Reposted by George Peretz KC
sirjjkc.bsky.social
The case that was “too big for the government to lose”

Because the government famously never loses big cases, which is why government ministers never get cross with judges who rule against them
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Absolutely.
davidallengreen.bsky.social
This is the judgment on the PPE/Medpro claim.

A cracking £122m win for the Government Legal Service

And is wonderful to see the government bringing a claim in contract against a shoddy supplier.

This does not happen often, and it should happen far more.

www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...
www.judiciary.uk
Reposted by George Peretz KC
joshuarozenberg.bsky.social
The government is currently reviewing the opt-out collective actions regime in competition law, which enables consumers to claim compensation from corporations accused of market abuse. How should we calibrate the balance between corporations and consumers?

rozenberg.substack.com/p/consumer-p...
Consumer protection?
Or limiting the burden on business? Which takes priority?
rozenberg.substack.com