Paolo Sandro
@paolosandro.bsky.social
5.9K followers 1.4K following 4.2K posts
Associate Professor of Public Law and Legal Theory @lawatleeds.bsky.social, author of 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (Hart 2022), Open Access at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4562656#
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
paolosandro.bsky.social
Incredibly grateful to Kara Woodbury-Smith for her perceptive and very generous review of my book 'The Making of Constitutional Democracy: From Creation to Application of Law' (which is fully Open Access, link in the skeet below) on Law and Philosophy. 🙏

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
But I can confidently say that I am a better-informed scholar having read his book. The terrain the book covers, its depth of content, its diachronic sensitivity, its accessibility, and its clarity are to be both praised and replicated. The first chapter in particular is excellent, along with the integration of administrative law. Moreover, given the lengths Sandro has gone to integrate philosophers from the Continent, the book is required reading for monolinguistic English speakers in the philosophy of law, like me. The book reads as though Sandro cares about his reader, not just whether they agree with him – though, of course that is always nice – but as though even if the reader does not end up buying his arguments and conclusions, he cares that you at the very least understand where he is coming from and why this topic, the application and creation of law in constitutional democracies, is worthy of serious consideration. Because of the care with which Sandro created this work, it would be suitable not only for academics working in legal and political philosophy, but for students of the subject as well. image of the cover page of the book the making of constitutional democracy: from creation to application of law by Paolo Sandro (Hart Publishing 2022)
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
tjdfotographist.bsky.social
Free speech is when I encourage people to send you death threats; hate speech is when you tell me to stop.
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
Can you hear the words coming out of your mouth, Megan?

Yes, the guy who received so many threats because of your own actions he had to flee to Europe isn’t the real victim. No. You are, because people called you out.
Megyn Doyle, a student at Rutgers and the treasurer for the Turning Point USA chapter who started the Change.org petition to remove Bray, told Fox News Digital in a statement that Di Filippo's petition is slanderous.
"The petition once again proves that Conservative students are always on the receiving end of hate when speaking about concerning issues," Doyle said.
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
craigcalcaterra.bsky.social
Unless they’re declaring him an anti-pope and installing their own guy in Avignon, they’re not “rejecting” him, they’re just bitching and moaning and forgetting who’s in charge of the church they’ve weirdly and ignorantly attempted to infiltrate. bsky.app/profile/wash...
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
leahlitman.bsky.social
Indicting political opponents & critics because they are political opponents & critics is terrifying.

It's completely inconsistent with the rule of law & democracy.

It should scare everyone - and (hopefully) will get people to realize that we all need to stand against this.
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
danneidle.bsky.social
Who benefits from the abolition of stamp duty land tax?

The first answer: people buying very expensive homes. Average saving for someone buying a £10m+ home is £1.7m. Average saving for someone buying a £250k-£500k home is £5k.
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
danneidle.bsky.social
So the immediate effect of abolishing stamp duty is that house prices rise, with a disproportionate benefit for people in £10m+ homes.

Abolition would literally be handing them £1m+
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
ryandoerfler.bsky.social
An actual opposition party would run this on a loop in every conceivable space.
collincountydems.bsky.social
This is terrifying!

ICE breaks into this woman’s car in the pick-up line at West Loop Elementary school in Chicago and detains her before she can pick her kids up from school. (They were eventually let go after showing their documents)

This is Trump’s America.
paolosandro.bsky.social
This is spot-on
legalweasel.uk
The first change we should make - and one that can't be easily undone - is a move to PR. Anything else would be legally simple, if procedurally slow, to change back if Reform do get a majority. But PR would deny them both that, and the ability to make sweeping changes.
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
leahlitman.bsky.social
Brett Kavanaugh: “The Govt sometimes makes brief investigative stops …”
Kavanaugh concurrence
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
mulchy.bsky.social
feds have been all over chicagoland today.

reports of people abducted from back of the yards, cicero, rogers park, hermosa, barrington, batavia, and bridgeview.

feds are out in force in aurora. not sharing video, but residents have likewise turned out in force—and they aren't happy.
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
paris.nyc
after the 10th radioactive shrimp recall in 7 weeks, i decided to do some digging

little did i know it would lead me to an underreported industrial accident that may have released an airborne plume of radioactive debris over swaths of indonesia
www.consumerreports.org/health/food-...
What Is Really Going on With All This Radioactive Shrimp? - Consumer Reports
Here’s the latest on how shrimp and spices got contaminated with cesium-137, how the FDA has responded, and why consumers should not panic.
www.consumerreports.org
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
normative.bsky.social
Brett Kavanaugh assures me this is the sort of minor inconvenience that shouldn't disturb anyone.
collincountydems.bsky.social
This is terrifying!

ICE breaks into this woman’s car in the pick-up line at West Loop Elementary school in Chicago and detains her before she can pick her kids up from school. (They were eventually let go after showing their documents)

This is Trump’s America.
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Calling law students interested in public law: the ALBA mooting competition is now under way. Details here. Academics/practitioners - please pass on. adminlaw.org.uk/event/the-ca...
The Catherine Callaghan Moot 2025 - ALBA
adminlaw.org.uk
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
david.noll.org
Again, a fundamental feature of this administration is policy based on facts that only exist if you are living inside a right-wing infotainment bubble.
nicholasgrossman.bsky.social
You must defer to the president’s determination that there is an armed rebellion in Chicago, argues the govt’s lawyer.

That’s the Trump admin’s stance on everything. When the law doesn’t allow it, lie about the facts until it’s something that would be legal, then insist others live inside the lie.
heathercherone.bsky.social
Perry: DOJ's definition of rebellion would mean that
"literally all nonviolent protest” could be considered evidence of rebellion. Is that your argument?
Hamilton: The president has determined there is a danger of a rebellion, and you must defer to that finding
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
bryanpeeler.bsky.social
To the surprise of no one...
fintwitter.bsky.social
Israel's Ben Gvir: 'We are happy about the release of all the hostages, but we will vote against the release of murderers. The Prime Minister committed to me that Hamas will be dismantled. If it doesn't happen? We will dismantle the government'
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
georgeperetzkc.bsky.social
Very good diagnosis of the ECHR debate here: and a key question as to how effectively to oppose the essentially vibes-based case against it (albeit with a veil of legitimacy from flimsy and bad faith, but apparently scholarly, publications by right wing think tanks with good media links).
paolosandro.bsky.social
Example: Italy under two decades of Berlusconi rule, while he controlled all six major TV channels in the country and several newspapers: having an entrenched constitution and an independent judiciary (made of career lawyers rather than politically-appointed cranks US-style) made all the difference!
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
Reposted by Paolo Sandro
lsolum.bsky.social
Please help me get the word out about the new websites for Legal Theory Blog and the Legal Theory Lexicon. Reposting here and on other social media sites is great. It would be especially helpful if law school faculty members could send an email to their colleagues with the new addresses.
Legal Theory Blog
Discover our latest articles and updates. Stay informed with recent posts that cover a variety of topics you care about!
legaltheoryblog.com
paolosandro.bsky.social
Ps but if I may, a bit of an academic pet peeve of mine: the US is not a representative example - let alone the paradigmatic case - of a system with an entrenched and codified constitution and constitutional review. Better to look at Ireland or on the Continent!
paolosandro.bsky.social
And I wholeheartedly support that aim! Happy to be of help, if I can be useful at all. I've written and am still writing precisely on this subject:

ukconstitutionallaw.org/2022/12/19/v...
paolosandro.bsky.social
To be fair, this is a problem not just with your proposals - it's much wider. Even the Brown Commission report on the future of the constitution - swiftly forgotten by Labour - suffered from the same fundamental issues when it comes to enhancing the protection for anti-majoritarian institutions
paolosandro.bsky.social
Hi Martin. I did look at the relevant part in the full report, and while those are all excellent suggestions, they would not provide much in terms of constraint against a future government minded to dismantle the independence of fourth-branch institutions. A one-line bill could suffice to do so.
paolosandro.bsky.social
I don't deny that, but for a government (and parliamentary majority) keen on institutional capture & consolidation of power even parliamentary scrutiny wouldn't be a big obstacle. But whether or not a parliament can bind the next is disputed..that's where a constitutional lawyer might have helped 😉