Possum
@pollytics.bsky.social
9K followers 3.2K following 3.9K posts
Political, economic and policy stuff. An unrepentant guitar gear hoarder. You know who I am. A social democrat on the beats - a libertarian between the human, civil and political rights sheets. The stupidity in this country is exhausting. Moreton Bay
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
pollytics.bsky.social
I agree they shouldn't have approved any of the Adani bullshit, but I also understand why they did - they were mines to nowhere. The big carbon bomb Adani wanted was told to get fucked, they made a mini mine, and it's up shit creek. Like all of the Adani stuff was going to be regardless of size.
pollytics.bsky.social
It's funny eh - it's a real thing!
pollytics.bsky.social
Shift forward ten years later - identical question. 70/30 pro reef.

Shift forward last year, 75/25 pro reef.
pollytics.bsky.social
They haven't for a long time I can remember back in the Qld mining boom we asked a polling question: "When it comes to the Great Barrier Reef and mining, do you think the balance has shifted towards ming at the reefs expense, or shifted towards preserving the reef at minings expense". 60/40 pro reef
pollytics.bsky.social
Not really. They're doing a little bit more than the bare minimum so as not to scare a pack of horses that no longer exist.
pollytics.bsky.social
You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.

But what if the marginal cost of eggs was approximately irrelevant to disposable income?
Reposted by Possum
ebonybennett.bsky.social
This could have been Australia, but thanks to John Howard, Tony Abbott, Scott Morrison, the Minerals Council and the BCA, we wasted nearly 20 years subsidising gas and coal instead. What a waste.
janrosenow.bsky.social
China ≠ just coal plants and solar exports. The deeper shift: electrifying everything it can. Strategic, because China relies on imported fossil fuels. Coal is still king in the power mix—for now. But the balance is changing year by year.
pollytics.bsky.social
I am extremely looking forward to the 8000 words in your provided footnotes! Doing them in font size 4 was <kisses fingers> 🤣
pollytics.bsky.social
But it has no significant political persuasion effect on the relatively small audience who reads it!
pollytics.bsky.social
They don't really ever win here - but they do get their balls tickled in embarrassingly public ways.
pollytics.bsky.social
Callide is great - we've saved a few explosions for later! 🤣
pollytics.bsky.social
Tempted to start up the 274,355th podcast of "why you're all fucking wrong" 🤣
pollytics.bsky.social
The bemusing part of this is even though the Qld coal fleet is youngest in the country, they won't last to the 2040s. The Qld government knows this - but throwing red meat to their idiot wing and their donors is an aesthetic I suppose.
pollytics.bsky.social
A case in point of low ALP horizons. They believe that passing new enviro laws with the LNP will:
1. Keep them bipartisan and long term
2. Keep resource companies at bay

The LNP are bad faith actors, mining owners hate you but new electoral funding laws nueter them
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10...?
Watt nears deal with Coalition to finally overhaul environment laws
Environment Minister Murray Watt will sit down with his Liberal counterpart Angie Bell today, with quiet optimism in both parties that a deal might soon be struck to finally rewrite Australia's "broke...
www.abc.net.au
pollytics.bsky.social
NRL every day of the week
pollytics.bsky.social
The LNP world hasn't been able to find their political arse with a map, a GPS system and a set of directions for a while now because they became deprofessionalised. But Labor's excuse is purely one of their own comfort with low horizons, and only having to beat the incompetence in front of them.
pollytics.bsky.social
Gives the government cover to send Brereton to the knackery, revisit public hearings procedures, update prioritisation of investigative areas etc.

Simple low hanging fruit stuff with no downsides.
pollytics.bsky.social
Reforming the NACC is some low hanging fruit shit. The simple political lines that "We created the first national corruption commission, it's done a god job, but we've seen where the rubber meets the road that it needs to be more robust. <insert actual reform>" Vote winner with easy Senate passage.
pollytics.bsky.social
If I was a Parliamentarian, I too would be keen to have Pocock booted from the parliamentary sports club, simply on the basis of having my arse kicked so comprehensively and so fucking often. People who are really good at one sport are generally good at every single sport (except one rando sport)
pollytics.bsky.social
"I don't understand why you and other conflate his motives and his actions."

Because he tried to prevent war crimes investigations!

He tried to put a very narrow set of truths out there, singularly to prevent the actual truth of Australian war crimes from being uncovered and publicly exposed!
pollytics.bsky.social
He tried to prevent war crimes investigations! That was his purpose!

This is not in dispute!
pollytics.bsky.social
No - his purpose and point was to stop the investigations, and that drum banging was just part of his idiot PR spiel.
pollytics.bsky.social
Yes - every single story about the details of this case!
pollytics.bsky.social
Another reminder - because far too many people don't seem to know it - this guy tried to *PREVENT* war crimes investigations. The only whistle he tried to blow was his own.

Why some of you held him up as some kind of heroic figure makes my brain bleed.