Ira Hyman
@irahyman.bsky.social
9.2K followers 1.3K following 6.7K posts
Professor of Psychology; Rider of Bicycles; Seeker of Justice. Applied cognitive psychologist, studying attention & memory, some disinfo too. (He/him; 1st gen college student). With maybe some pictures of Cookie the bernedoodle.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
irahyman.bsky.social
A Just Asking Questions Effect for spreading false information.
This thread is an overview of my lab’s research that I presented at Psychonomics this morning. #psynow24

TLDR: Getting people to generate their own false answers leads them to believe that info. 1/
Just Asking Questions: Can an Implication Generate an Illusory Truth Effect?
Ira E. Hyman, Jr., Jasmine Balmelli-Morales, Macallan Enns-Ford, Annika Fiala, Zoe Gadbow, Macy Kneipp, Isabel Nguyen, Gwen Pane
Western Washington University

Madeline Jalbert
University of Washington
irahyman.bsky.social
I am anti-fascist.
I will be attending our local "No Kings" rally.

Ain't no one paying me to go.

I guess I am part of antifa? I need a Captain America shield.
Reposted by Ira Hyman
irahyman.bsky.social
Anyone have any data on how AI is affecting learning in college students (or earlier age groups)?

I see the hype. I also see the reasonable criticism (and I agree).

But data? Anyone got data?
irahyman.bsky.social
Never earlier than 6, 6:05-6:10 to be polite, never later than 6:15 without letting them know we will be late.

But in my town, getting around isn't difficult, so timing arrivals is easier.
irahyman.bsky.social
I mean, the more I think about it, the more this works.

The conservative justices are coauthors on their manuscripts (decisions).

But there aren’t any reviewers or editors. They don’t ever have their work evaluated. It’s showing.

As much as we struggle with reviewer 2, they keep us honest.
irahyman.bsky.social
And it can feel like real and serious scholarly work. They read old documents and interpret them with thoughtful effort.

The trick is their reading list and the lack of criticism they take seriously.

As an academic, I also read and interpret from my position. But I have reviewers who respond.
irahyman.bsky.social
Since the Justices aren’t historians, they simply are searching old documents to find writings that line up with what they want to find.

All of us engage in some biased searches and biased memory. But nothing constrains Justices. The rest of us run into reality at least occasionally.
irahyman.bsky.social
Both sides.

If you start your answer about Trump’s politicizing the Attorney General’s office with “both sides …” ?

You should get out of politics.

Both sidesing issues is part of how disinformation campaigns work. Stand on the side with more truth. Avoid false equivalencies.
zohrankmamdani.bsky.social
Andrew Cuomo is incapable of speaking clearly and directly about Trump’s authoritarianism.
irahyman.bsky.social
He’s just out there knocking in runs and winning baseball games.
Reposted by Ira Hyman
mikecaulfield.bsky.social
People always aske me "What does SIFT for AI look like?" Meaning, what is the minimal set of habits you need to teach students to use it effectively for exploration of claims online? It's taken a couple years to get here but this is a start at a response mikecaulfield.substack.com/p/get-it-in-...
Get it in, track it down, follow up
Three essential moves to using AI for verification and contextualization, with a bit of LLM-specific guidance
mikecaulfield.substack.com
irahyman.bsky.social
I think Angie and I are the lucky ones. Good day today. Even included a rainbow sighting on the way home.
irahyman.bsky.social
In Seattle tonight and found that Portland’s Voodoo Donuts has invaded.

I’m thinking Portland should open Voodoo donuts and Salt and Straw ice cream shops in red states. Return the attacks with food.
Voodoo Donut shop seen in Seattle. The shop is a nice pink color.
irahyman.bsky.social
Anyone have any data on how AI is affecting learning in college students (or earlier age groups)?

I see the hype. I also see the reasonable criticism (and I agree).

But data? Anyone got data?
irahyman.bsky.social
WTF. I had seen the photo of the car hit by the ICE officers. But this is worse. They hit her car, then jump out, attack her and arrest her!

How the heck do we shut this down?
thetnholler.bsky.social
“YOU hit HER.”

CHICAGO - Trump’s ICE goons ram into a passing car after snatching someone, then brutally drag the female driver of the car they hit out of her car with guns drawn and arrest her too. (Her brother says she’s a citizen)
irahyman.bsky.social
Much the way that people making decisions at universities don’t represent faculty, staff, or students as a whole.

Board members and presidents are making the decisions. Maybe in the best interest of the university, but probably not.
irahyman.bsky.social
Masks.
No name tags or badges.
No identification on the vehicles.

Yep. That’s a secret police force.
Reposted by Ira Hyman
polphilpod.bsky.social
i made a model to assign scores for how robustly US politicians oppose fascism & graded 13 leading dems

criteria & method QTed, individual results in 🧵 below:
Reposted by Ira Hyman
zohrankmamdani.bsky.social
UNTIL IT’S DONE, Ep. 4: Sylvia Rivera

In the 1970s, queer New Yorkers had been pushed to the margins of NYC. Our trans neighbors faced immense cruelty. But in Sylvia Rivera, they found a champion.

As we combat Trump’s politics of darkness, her legacy can light the path forward.
irahyman.bsky.social
There are a lot of people with money involved in getting folks to believe false narratives.
irahyman.bsky.social
Not asking for better accuracy, I see.

And turning down the wokeness will turn up the racism and conspiracy theories. It’s a question of what associations the system learns from internet patterns.
irahyman.bsky.social
US Government is not a reliable source of information. That seems to be part of what is leading to these decisions limiting calling out the guard and why grand juries aren’t returning indictments.

From decision “the Court cannot conclude that (government) declarations are reliable.”
juliedicaro.bsky.social
Judge Sara Ellis' opinion in IL v. Trump is an absolute banger:

www.courtlistener.com/docket/71559...
The Court therefore must make a credibility assessment as to which version of the facts
should be believed. While the Court does not doubt that there have been acts of vandalism, civil
disobedience, and even assaults on federal agents, the Court cannot conclude that Defendants’
declarations are reliable. Two of Defendants’ declarations refer to arrests made on September 27,
2025 of individuals who were carrying weapons and assaulting federal agents. See Doc. 62-2 at
19; Doc. 62-4 at 5. But neither declaration discloses that federal grand juries have refused to
return an indictment against at least three of those individuals, which equates to a finding of a
lack of probable cause that any crime occurred. See United States v. Ray Collins and Jocelyne
Robledo, 25-cr-608, Doc. 26 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 7, 2025); United States v. Paul Ivery, 25-cr-609
(N.D. Ill.). In addition to demonstrating a potential lack of candor by these affiants, it also calls
into question their ability to accurately assess the facts. Similar declarations were provided by
these same individuals in Chicago Headline Club et. al. v. Noem, 25-cv-12173, Doc. 35-1, Doc.
35-9 (N.D. Ill.), a case which challenged the Constitutionality of ICE’s response to protestors at
the Broadview ICE Processing Center. In issuing its TRO against DHS Secretary Kristi Noem,
the court in that case found that the plaintiffs would likely be able to show that ICE’s actions
have violated protestors’ First Amendment right to be free from retaliation while engaged in
newsgathering, religious exercise, and protest, and Fourth Amendment rights to be free from
excessive force. Id. at Doc. 43. Although this Court was not asked to make any such finding, it
does note a troubling trend of Defendants’ declarants equating protests with riots and a lack of
appreciation for the wide spectrum that exists between citizens who are observing, questioning,
irahyman.bsky.social
Scientific integrity isn’t based on right wing conspiracy theories and the goals of oligarchs.
standupforscience.bsky.social
Let's recap. This May, the Trump administration established "Gold Standard Science," using the language of scientific integrity and openness to empower political appointees like RFK Jr. to override scientists debunking Trump's dogma around science — from climate change to vaccines. #impeachthequack
5 Slides with info: 1/ Fools Gold standard science, what does it mean? 2/ In May, the Trump administration issued an executive order “Restoring Gold Standard Science.” Political appointees are empowered to designate any research as scientific misconduct based on their own “judgment” and includes the power to punish the scientists involved accordingly  This executive order allows political appointees to sit in judgement of science and scientists, with government as a weapon. 5 Slides with info: 1/ Fools Gold standard science, what does it mean? 2/ In May, the Trump administration issued an executive order “Restoring Gold Standard Science.” Political appointees are empowered to designate any research as scientific misconduct based on their own “judgment” and includes the power to punish the scientists involved accordingly  This executive order allows political appointees to sit in judgement of science and scientists, with government as a weapon. 5 Slides with info: 1/ Fools Gold standard science, what does it mean? 2/ In May, the Trump administration issued an executive order “Restoring Gold Standard Science.” Political appointees are empowered to designate any research as scientific misconduct based on their own “judgment” and includes the power to punish the scientists involved accordingly  This executive order allows political appointees to sit in judgement of science and scientists, with government as a weapon. 5 Slides with info: 1/ Fools Gold standard science, what does it mean? 2/ In May, the Trump administration issued an executive order “Restoring Gold Standard Science.” Political appointees are empowered to designate any research as scientific misconduct based on their own “judgment” and includes the power to punish the scientists involved accordingly  This executive order allows political appointees to sit in judgement of science and scientists, with government as a weapon.