LightNews
krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies
@krishardies.bsky.social
150 followers 140 following 87 posts

Scientist, accounting, philosophy of science

Videos
Business 63%
Economics 15%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · 5d
Isn't this just, the times they are a-changin?

It's hardly 10y ago that Stanford hosted the "Causality in the Social Sciences Conference", which was quite eye opening for many people in accounting and finance.

Before the credibility revolution there was no need to think about all of this.
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · 5d
This seems a bit of a common thread among a lot of anti-AI discourse: Sensible/obvious/interesting commentary mixed with rather stupid anti-capitalism sentiment.
2

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · 13d
Is dat wel zo? Ik weet dat Kathryn Harden (*) dat zegt, maar het is minder evident, zie bijv. www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=...

(*) Ik las recent haar boek en het is goed geschreven, maar uiteindelijk vond ik het toch wat teleurstellend (ietwat oppervlakkig qua filosofisch denken en sociaalbeleid).

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · 13d
Would you care to elaborate about this?
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · 28d
"Vakantie is voor watjes" hangt er op een poster bij ons op de campus, ter aanmoediging van studenten tijdens de 2de zit, ik erger er me dood aan.

Die normalisering van 2de zittijd, mede door de universiteit zelf, is echt problematisch – en best recent, ik ben nog niet zo oud.
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Sep 3
Immediately have to think about this now -- fitting it's in German, even though Asterix is French.
www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...
65 JAHRE ASTERIX | Der legendäre Passierschein A38 aus "Asterix erobert Rom"
Die spinnen, die Römer! Das Duo Asterix & Obelix, deren Dorf erbitterten Widerstand gegen Julius Cäsar leisten, sind legendär! Vor 65 Jahre erschien der erste Band von René Goscinny und Albert Uderzo. Schau dir hier eine der legendärsten Szenen der Zeichentrickfilme an - den Passierschein A38 aus "Asterix erobert Rom". ► Abonniere STUDIOCANAL Germany: http://bit.ly/1jyEcJd ► Werde Fan: http://www.facebook.com/STUDIOCANAL.GERMANY ► Subscribe: https://www.instagram.com/studiocanal.de Inhalt: Noch immer leistet ein kleines gallisches Dorf den römischen Übergriffen erbitterten Widerstand. Aber Cäsar gibt nicht auf und will endlich reinen Tisch machen. Und so macht er sich auf den Weg zu den unbesiegbaren Galliern, um ihnen eine Wette vorzuschlagen. Sollten sie wirklich alle zwölf Aufgaben erfolgreich lösen, die Cäsar sich ausgedacht hat, dann wird er seinen Rücktritt erklären. Cäsar rechnet allerdings nicht mit den beiden listigen Freunden Asterix und Obelix, die die Wette auf ihre ganz spezielle Art und Weise einlösen. © 1975 LES ÉDITIONS ALBERT RENÉ / GOSCINNY-UDERZO. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. #asterixobelix #65JahreAsterix
www.google.com
2

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Aug 26
I think Colin is 100% right here. Obviously, fake data, fake citations, etc. are a problem, but I see no reason why they'd be more problematic if authors used AI. Not only does that seem the only workable stance, I also think it's the only principled stance that makes sense.
1 2

Reposted by Joshua Goodman, David J. Berri, Judith Scott-Clayton , and 2 more

johnlist.bsky.social
John A. List @johnlist.bsky.social · Aug 4
Referees make the journal system work. They are selfless in volunteering their time to ensure that our science continues to progress.

All of the great referees out there please know that editors recognize your hard work and tireless effort. We do not always say it, but we do! Thank you.
1 12 55

Reposted by Steven G. Medema, Mark E. Schaffer, Luis Garicano , and 1 more

bengolub.bsky.social
Ben Golub @bengolub.bsky.social · Jan 15
The discussion ending at this tweet is very smart on both sides ( @lugaricano.bsky.social and @shengwuli.bsky.social ), reasonably spicy, and fun to read.
lugaricano.bsky.social
Luis Garicano @lugaricano.bsky.social · Jan 14
I don't think the argument for the price system rests on full information. I think it rests on Hayek 1945, hence precisely on dispersed local knowledge --i said that before. But let's leave it here. I think we clarified quite a bit, and I hope some of our readers (if there are any!) learned a bit.
4 23 110

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jul 17
Accounting. (*)
(*) Some would say the pay is better as well, but, of course, that's mostly just in the US.

I do want to invent "accounting OF PoS" now 😀
1 1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jul 17
Count yourself lucky you're in a field where the norm isn't to have you jump through revision hoops 4-5 times for each and every paper. 😀
1 1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jul 5
Also reading this right now, so hopefully this will turn out to be such a book!

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jul 5
Reading this 2013 book – not much new at this point anymore – really makes me wonder which books I should be reading now rather than 10+ years from now ...
#science #books #causality
2

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jul 5
Should we start using the term "misracing"?!
1 2

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jul 2
Thanks for the elaborative response, interesting!
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 28
Thanks for the comment @marcelorinesi.bsky.social not sure if I'm understanding it correctly. The task (evaluating if a paper should get published [in journal X]) is the same as under the current review system.

Of course, I'm assuming we accept the "jury theorem" arguments from that paper.
1 1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 26
Interesting paper on peer review bsky.app/profile/last... I think a variation is possible where a journal would actually experiment with such an approach to decide whether to publish a paper or not.

Focus is only on evaluation then but can be combined with improvement if we want that.
krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 26
The interesting thing about the "crowd-sourced peer review" suggestion is that it seems a journal could implement this. Say you have 200 editorial board members. Instead of asking 2 to review as editorial input, give all of them access to the paper and decide accept/reject if you have 10 votes.

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 26
The interesting thing about the "crowd-sourced peer review" suggestion is that it seems a journal could implement this. Say you have 200 editorial board members. Instead of asking 2 to review as editorial input, give all of them access to the paper and decide accept/reject if you have 10 votes.
1 2

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 26
Thanks, Bart! @penders.bsky.social

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 26
Any work to recommend? I was recently looking for research specifically on the end of research fields but didn't find much of interest
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 19
A market with multiple large competitors, many smaller ones, and low fixed costs (entry barriers?) for sure doesn't scream monopoly to me; whatever profits there are made. Not saying there is no market power (let alone no problems).
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 19
It's interesting that from the top five in econ, only Econometrica is published by one of the big commercial publishers, but I don't think that has any marked effect on how publishing in econ works compared to other fields. It's very unclear that non-profit or academic publishers are any better.
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 19
Or entirely from scratch such as @collabrapsychology.bsky.social There are also still plenty of non-profit publishers (electronic engineering is dominated by IEEE), including academic associations.
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 19
It's also not so clear that journals' reputation is heavily tied to their publishers. There are quite a few examples where editorial boards resigned en masse and succesfully started a new journal (e.g. Glossa in linguistics, Quantitative Science Studies, and very recently Imaging Neuroscience).
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 19
Not getting hung up on semantics, I think the Q is essentially about market power. I'm inclined to believe that the big academic publishers have (too much) market power but I've never seen good evidence. Yes, their market share and profit margins are high but that's not market power per se.
1

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 18
Why is this a natural monopoly? [Reputation is more of a barrier than cost structure, I guess, and there are recent examples that journals can be launched succesfully from scratch.] You're probably right about the rents but I've never seen any good analyses on this.
1 1

Reposted by Olivier Klein, Wim Van Lancker, Patrick S. Forscher , and 1 more

dingdingpeng.the100.ci
Julia M. Rohrer @dingdingpeng.the100.ci · Jun 12
"Simpson's gender-equality paradox" surely deserve some award for best title 👑
The gender-equality paradox seems really central to some narrative people have constructed (and successfully sold). I absolutely wouldn't be surprised if it turned out 100% confounding.>

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
7 42 170

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · Jun 4
A bit sad to see an online meeting/training on ”How to make your research reproducible”, seeing canceled 'due to too few registrations.' :-\
2

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · May 27
I don't think the "without compensation" is correct framing because we're paid by our uni and do this during working hours (I admit, we can disagree on the latter part). It should be rewarded by the uni if they think it's part of what they're paying us for, but I think that's a different point.

krishardies.bsky.social
Kris Hardies @krishardies.bsky.social · May 27
Ok, I wasn't aware of that! I guess only panel members, not external reviewers? I've done some reviews for the NWO and the German equivalent, no payment there. What would change if the FWO stopped doing this? Maybe it would make things worse, but I'm not sure about it.