Tom Jawetz
@tomjawetz.bsky.social
1.2K followers 120 following 84 posts
Now: CAP Senior Fellow and immigration law & policy consultant Then: DHS Deputy General Counsel (2021-22); CAP Immigration (2015-21); House Judiciary (2009-15); ACLU National Prison Project (2005-09) All views my own. He/Him
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Long time tweeter, first time skeeter.

I try to post smart things immigration law and policy. Also dumb things.

My written pieces for @americanprogress.bsky.social can be found here 👇

www.americanprogress.org/people/jawet...
Tom Jawetz
www.americanprogress.org
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Our refugee admissions program is almost singularly focused on bringing in white South Africans.

They’re not being coded. The quiet part is being yelled loudly.
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Here’s an AI-generated image DHS just tweeted out alongside their posting for this new “Homeland Defender” position.

The white supremacist iconography mirrors the policy preferences of the administration. Years ago Trump said he preferred immigrants from countries like Denmark, Switzerland, Norway.
tomjawetz.bsky.social
How can we defend our culture against the white supremacists that have infiltrated our government?
New USCIS job posting for a Homeland Defender that says “Protect your homeland and defend your culture. Join USCIS, America’s frontline defense against illegal foreign infiltration and fraud.”
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Outstanding line of questioning by Rep. Neguse about a terrible provision in the Republicans’ budget reconciliation bill.

Here’s Erwin Chemerinsky’s analysis of the language: www.justsecurity.org/113529/terri...
tomjawetz.bsky.social
🧵
cnewman.bsky.social
I'm going to thread a couple of framing questions on this thread for anyone interested in covering the terrible decision in Noem v NTPSA.....
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
BREAKING: SCOTUS allows DHS to reinstate Sec. Kristi Noem's order ending Temporary Protected Status for many Venezuelans, but notes the decision does not address challenges to actions "purport[ing] to invalidate" related legal status, work authorization documents, etc., previously granted under TPS.
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Great explainer by Erwin Chemerinsky about a dangerous provision that House Republicans are trying to sneak into their budget reconciliation bill.

A direct attack on judicial independence and the rule of law.
justsecurity.org
A Terrible Idea

By Dean Erwin Chemerinsky

On the reconciliation bill’s provision that would restrict federal courts’ authority to hold government officials in contempt for violating court orders

#RuleOfLaw #ContemptOfCourt #Congress
A Terrible Idea
Dean Chemerinsky discusses the reconciliation bill’s provision that would restrict federal courts’ authority to hold government officials in contempt for violating court orders
www.justsecurity.org
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Excellent breakdown of two emergency stay requests pending at SCOTUS with huge implications.
stevevladeck.bsky.social
Everyone’s focus at #SCOTUS is (understandably) on the birthright citizenship cases.

But in two other pending applications, the Trump admin. is asking the justices to let it immediately subject more than one *million* additional immigrants to arrest, detention, and removal.

More, via “One First”:
Bonus 150: A Tale of Two (Other) Immigration Cases
A deeper dive into two of the pending emergency applications from the Trump administration in immigration cases that have received far less attention, but are no less important.
www.stevevladeck.com
Reposted by Tom Jawetz
bbkogan.bsky.social
under the gop proposal, married parents can’t claim the child tax credit if one of them isn’t a citizen. literally punishing children while creating a monetary incentive to get divorced. ghoulish shit.
bbkogan.bsky.social
the gop proposal for the child tax credit is evil.

before tcja, parents w/ kids could get it. in tcja, they required the kid be a citizen.

now they’d require both parents be citizens. unless they’re unmarried - then if one’s a citizen they can get it.

punishing kids - and a divorce incentive
tomjawetz.bsky.social
And yet the Department's spokesperson calls it "a successful operation." You can't make this stuff up... www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...
Reposted by Tom Jawetz
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
NEW: In a SCATHING decision, Judge Briones of the Western District of Texas absolutely SAVAGED the government over this case, tearing to shreds ICE’s hearsay “evidence” that this husband and wife were in Tren de Aragua as “completely and wholly unsubstantiated” — and ordered their immediate release!
3. Conclusion
It is this Court's finding that Respondents' Response and testimony was replete with
conclusions, declarations, and accusations, by anything
meaningful in the record. Respondents have been unable to convince the Court by even a preponderance of the evidence, let alone clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence required, that Petitioners Sanchez Garcia and Sanchez Puentes are members of Tren de Aragua, and therefore has not shown this Court that they are properly designated "alien enemies" under the AEA pursuant the TdA Proclamation.
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Great read.
stevevladeck.bsky.social
Just before 1 a.m., #SCOTUS stepped back into the Alien Enemy Act litigation with a (remarkable) ruling that suggests, among other things, that a majority of the justices is tiring of the Trump administration’s Calvinball.

For more, see the latest “One First”:

www.stevevladeck.com/p/144-the-su...
144. The Supreme Court's Late-Night Alien Enemy Act Intervention
Just before 1:00 a.m., the justices (aggressively) stepped back into the Alien Enemy Act litigation—in a decision suggesting that a majority understands that these are no longer normal circumstances.
www.stevevladeck.com
Reposted by Tom Jawetz
rparloff.bsky.social
Some notes on this morning’s remarkable emergency stay order granted by SCOTUS, stopping Trump Adm from summarily removing Venezuelans under his Alien Enemies Act proclamation. SCOTUS acted while the NDTexas & 5th Circuit courts dragged their feet. Thread:
1/10
bsky.app/profile/anna...
annabower.bsky.social
BREAKING: Supreme Court temporarily blocks removal of Venezuelan migrants under the Alien Enemies Act
(ORDER LIST: 604 U.S.)
SATURDAY, APRIL 19, 2025
24A1007
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
A.A.R.P., ET AL. V. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF U.S., ET AL.

There is before the Court an application on behalf of a putative class of detainees seeking an injunction against their
removal under the Alien Enemies Act. The matter is currently pending before the Fifth Circuit. Upon action by the Fifth Circuit, the Solicitor General is invited to file a response to
the application before this Court as soon as possible. The Government is directed not to remove any member of the putative
class of detainees from the United States until further order of this Court. See 28 U. S. C. §1651(a).

Justice Thomas and Justice Alito dissent from the Court's
order.

Statement from Justice Alito to follow.
Reposted by Tom Jawetz
krhawkins.bsky.social
So now we find out how directly and undeniably complicit in enforced disappearance and torture some Supreme Court justices want to be. Good times.
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Must read 🧵
krhawkins.bsky.social
Thread of documents and sources re possibly imminent renditions from Bluebonnet detention facility to El Salvador
tomjawetz.bsky.social
This is the same lawyer who may face criminal contempt in the Alien Enemies Act case and who led the Abrego Garcia and Gitmo cases.

I’m guessing he likes his celebrity more than his law license.

He also appears to be arguing ALL of these cases because no career DOJ attorney would dare.
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
In the decision, Judge Murphy accuses Trump admin lawyer Drew Ensign of making a "preposterous" argument that was "either an effort to prevaricate or is deeply disingenuous."

Ensign argued people had to ask an immigration judge to reopen a case — even on a weekend when the court was closed.
Defendants claim that an alien can raise fear-based concerns through reopening IJ proceedings or petitioning the court of appeals for review. E.g., April 10, 2025 Rough Tr. at 9:24–10:5 (“MR. ENSIGN: Your Honor, they would have needed to raise it earlier or -- and if we were in the second part of the [March] guidance, they also could manifest fear at that point and then it would go to screening. So there’s that potentially available as well. But, you know, to the extent they have awareness of that now, they should go back before the IJ and BIA.”); id. at 10:19–22 (“MR. ENSIGN: Your Honor, they would have needed to go to the BIA before [they are notified of third-country removal plans]. There’s nothing under the [March] guidance that would require additional notice or an opportunity to challenge it at that moment.”); id. at 27:10–13 (“[MR. ENSIGN:] There is -- the typical way it . . . would be raised is a motion to reopen if you haven’t raised it already, and then you can raise it to the Court of Appeals.”); id. at 44:2–11 (“THE COURT: So it happens Saturday morning, the person raises a fear that department disagrees -- they make it through the first screening, the department disagrees. That person is then going to be deported on Sunday morning. As a practical matter, there’s no judicial review of that decision, right? MR. ENSIGN: There would be administrative review potentially in the IJ. THE COURT: How would they do that? It’s Saturday. MR. ENSIGN: Your Honor, I don’t know the specifics of the IJ proceedings.”). This claim is either an effort to prevaricate or is deeply disingenuous. The suggestion that an alien must—or even can—reopen an immigration proceeding at 6:00 a.m. on a Saturday prior to being removed that same weekend is preposterous on its face. See, e.g., Exec. Office for Immigr. Rev., Boston Immigration Court, U.S. Dep’t of Just., https://www.justice.gov/eoir/boston-immigration-court (last updated Apr. 9, 2025) (“The immigration court is open Monday to…
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Not the first time a county has illegally imprisoned a U.S. citizen on an ICE detainer request.

As in those cases, the county is likely to pay out a chunk of $$$ for violating this guy’s constitutional rights.
tomjawetz.bsky.social
Good pieces by Ezra Klein and Philip Bump on Trump’s illegal disappearance of Kilmar Abrego Garcia.

But details matter. Withholding of removal wasn’t granted because fear of persecution was “credible”or “well founded.”

The judge concluded it was *more likely than not* to happen.