Then: DHS Deputy General Counsel (2021-22); CAP Immigration (2015-21); House Judiciary (2009-15); ACLU National Prison Project (2005-09)
All views my own. He/Him
I try to post smart things immigration law and policy. Also dumb things.
My written pieces for @americanprogress.bsky.social can be found here 👇
www.americanprogress.org/people/jawet...
Here’s Erwin Chemerinsky’s analysis of the language: www.justsecurity.org/113529/terri...
Here’s Erwin Chemerinsky’s analysis of the language: www.justsecurity.org/113529/terri...
It undercuts federal courts' ability to enforce contempt orders.
Read Dean Erwin Chemerinsky’s sharp analysis.
www.justsecurity.org/113529/terri...
It undercuts federal courts' ability to enforce contempt orders.
Read Dean Erwin Chemerinsky’s sharp analysis.
www.justsecurity.org/113529/terri...
A direct attack on judicial independence and the rule of law.
By Dean Erwin Chemerinsky
On the reconciliation bill’s provision that would restrict federal courts’ authority to hold government officials in contempt for violating court orders
#RuleOfLaw #ContemptOfCourt #Congress
A direct attack on judicial independence and the rule of law.
But in two other pending applications, the Trump admin. is asking the justices to let it immediately subject more than one *million* additional immigrants to arrest, detention, and removal.
More, via “One First”:
before tcja, parents w/ kids could get it. in tcja, they required the kid be a citizen.
now they’d require both parents be citizens. unless they’re unmarried - then if one’s a citizen they can get it.
punishing kids - and a divorce incentive
That matters for constitutional purposes. @justsecurity.org www.justsecurity.org/110679/depor...
That matters for constitutional purposes. @justsecurity.org www.justsecurity.org/110679/depor...
For more, see the latest “One First”:
www.stevevladeck.com/p/144-the-su...
1/10
bsky.app/profile/anna...
1/10
bsky.app/profile/anna...
I’m guessing he likes his celebrity more than his law license.
He also appears to be arguing ALL of these cases because no career DOJ attorney would dare.
Ensign argued people had to ask an immigration judge to reopen a case — even on a weekend when the court was closed.
I’m guessing he likes his celebrity more than his law license.
He also appears to be arguing ALL of these cases because no career DOJ attorney would dare.
As in those cases, the county is likely to pay out a chunk of $$$ for violating this guy’s constitutional rights.
As in those cases, the county is likely to pay out a chunk of $$$ for violating this guy’s constitutional rights.
But details matter. Withholding of removal wasn’t granted because fear of persecution was “credible”or “well founded.”
The judge concluded it was *more likely than not* to happen.
But details matter. Withholding of removal wasn’t granted because fear of persecution was “credible”or “well founded.”
The judge concluded it was *more likely than not* to happen.
This letter is great. migrantinsider.com/p/lawmakers-...
This letter is great. migrantinsider.com/p/lawmakers-...