Adrianna McIntyre
@adrianna.bsky.social
11K followers 460 following 1.2K posts
Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Politics at @hsph.harvard.edu I study how administrative burdens impede health insurance coverage, strategies to reduce these barriers, and the politics of health reform she/her/Michigander
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
adrianna.bsky.social
Hi, new friends.

I mostly research and write about health insurance coverage and access — specifically, how to improve take-up and retention in Medicaid and marketplace plans. I also study the politics of health reform.

Sidekick Nellie cares less about health policy and more about kibble policy.
adrianna.bsky.social
As people get sticker shock from letters about their new marketplace premiums and have to figure out what to do, it sure seems like it would be useful if there was a well-funded program to help people... navigate their options
adrianna.bsky.social
anyway I'm slowly emerging from having been on vacation slow couple news weeks huh
adrianna.bsky.social
Fundamentally the same dynamic as the ESI tax exclusion, which is famously politically untouchable — and which, as a tax expenditure, "costs" taxpayers about 10x the amount that extending enhanced subsidies is projected to cost
larrylevitt.bsky.social
One political challenge for Republicans right now is that there is no constituency that directly benefits from allowing the ACA enhanced tax credits to expire. Yet, there are 22 million people who will see their out-of-pocket premiums go up.
adrianna.bsky.social
Does anyone have a favorite short, recent-ish, and US-centric reading on "shadow bureaucracy" or "shadow government" (the increasing role that consultancies and other private organizations play in public administration)?

Something like this paper, but more bite-sized
www.augustinepotter.com
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
ddiamond.bsky.social
KFF finds partisan split on Tylenol

Most Republicans (56%) say they think it’s definitely or probably true that taking Tylenol during pregnancy increases the risk of kids with autism.

Most Dems (86%) say it’s definitely or probably false.

Multiple medical associations have said there’s no link.
KFF
Donate
Many Are Uncertain if Taking Tylenol During Pregnancy Increases Risk of Children
Developing Autism, Most Republicans Say it is Probably or Definitely True
Do you think that it is definitely true, probably true, probably false, or definitely false that taking Tylenol during pregnancy increases the risk of the child developing autism?
I Definitely true Probably true Probably false
Definitely false
Total
30%
30%
35%
Party ID
Democrats
27%
Independents
29%
59%
33%
Republicans
50%
34%
31%
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
ashleykirzinger.bsky.social
This is why I think there is widespread support for continuing the enhanced premium tax credits. It is less about the connection to the ACA and more about people's overwhelming concerns about the cost of health care.

Want to see health care rank as a top voting issue again? Ask about cost.
adrianna.bsky.social
Useful new analysis from @mattafiedler.bsky.social: A specific — and arguably particularly consequential — effect of allowing enhanced ACA subsidies to lapse is that net-$0 plans would become far less available.

Matt estimates this change, alone, would cause over 400,000 people to lose coverage.
How would eliminating $0 Marketplace premiums affect insurance coverage? | Brookings
www.brookings.edu
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
ryanenos.bsky.social
Nothing shows the dangerous tendency to normalize authoritarianism like the New York Times coverage of the extortion of Harvard. One could read this article and think it is about a free agent inking a contract with the Yankees. www.nytimes.com/2025/10/09/u...
Harvard Seeks Assurances as Talks Restart in Washington
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
julierovner.bsky.social
Sir, you signed the law guaranteeing back pay for furloughed workers in 2018...
atrupar.com
Q: Is it the White House's position that furloughed workers should get backpay?

TRUMP: I would say it depends on who we're talking about
adrianna.bsky.social
Alternative is that he’s shooting from the hip based on knowing the marketplace integrity rule (1) proposed a number of policies purportedly targeting fraudulent enrollment and (2) asserted that the rule on balance ~could~ improve the risk pool, but (2) was all hand-waving and contrary to research
adrianna.bsky.social
The most charitable interpretation, I think, is that he was confusing individual premiums and net federal spending on APTCs, but the question pretty clearly seems to be about the former!
adrianna.bsky.social
Zero-claim enrollees would be risk-pool-improving and premium-reducing.

Reasonable people can debate whether/to what extent the increase in zero-claim enrollees might reflect increased broker-driven fraudulent enrollment, but not whether that enrollment increases (individual) premiums.
sarahkarlin-smith.bsky.social
Oz seems to suggest there are very large number of people who have ACA plans who don't file claims in any year - suggesting fraud going on and this is why premiums are going up.
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
aatishb.bsky.social
The number of international students arriving in the U.S. in August fell by 19 percent this year compared with last year — the largest decline on record outside of the pandemic.
Nearly 20 Percent Fewer International Students Traveled to the U.S. in August (Gift Article)
The data shows the steepest decline in August international student arrivals since the pandemic.
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
sbagen.bsky.social
This is a really outstanding post. "That’s the point of the compact. .... It is about control. Specifically it is about turning existing federal law, over which the administration has limited control, into terms of a 'deal' that offers the government much more control."
fishkin.bsky.social
I thought I'd put the administration's proposed "compact" with universities in context, so I wrote the blog post below.

It's especially for journalists covering this story!

Many details about how the compact itself works and why the administration has retreated to this strategy.
Balkinization: The Art of Replacing the Law with the Deal
A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics
balkin.blogspot.com
adrianna.bsky.social
This Data for Progress survey gets at this more directly.

www.dataforprogress.org/insights/202...
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
adrianna.bsky.social
Key (big!) caveat is that we didn’t directly evaluate whether people understood that MassHealth (or whatever it is in their state) = Medicaid. The motivation for the survey when we conducted it — untethered from *gestures* all this — was about measuring program support, not policy literacy.
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
adrianna.bsky.social
Key (big!) caveat is that we didn’t directly evaluate whether people understood that MassHealth (or whatever it is in their state) = Medicaid. The motivation for the survey when we conducted it — untethered from *gestures* all this — was about measuring program support, not policy literacy.
adrianna.bsky.social
“The whole point of EMTALA is that when you get a person at the door, you stabilize them before you ask them any effing questions.”

www.thebulwark.com/p/government...
Congress ultimately addressed both needs, by putting EMTALA and the Emergency Medicaid initiative into 1986 budget legislation.4 And although Vance, in a Fox interview last week, described Emergency Medicaid as a “Biden-era” program, it was signed into law by the Republican who was in the White House at the time: conservative patron saint Ronald Reagan. Leavitt herself seemed to acknowledge that on Friday, when another reporter asked her a question similar to the one she got from NBC News: “Is it the administration’s position that hospitals should not have to treat people who come to ERs who are not here legally?”

“No,” she said, “that’s not our position.” Just like that, she conceded the rationale for EMTALA and Emergency Medicaid—and acknowledged that the Trump administration actually supports taxpayer-funded health care for illegal immigrants. Maybe someone should tell JD Vance.
Reposted by Adrianna McIntyre
larrylevitt.bsky.social
The false idea that Democrats, in pushing to reverse Medicaid and ACA cuts, are advocating for an expansion of health care for undocumented immigrants is maybe the biggest health policy distortion since the supposed "death panels" in Obamacare.
adrianna.bsky.social
It’s that time of year again: The information session for Harvard’s PhD in Health Policy will be held a month from today, on Tuesday, October 28.

Register here (recording will be available for those who can’t make it): harvard.zoom.us/meeting/regi...