Andrew Fischer
@andrewmfischer.bsky.social
2.1K followers 530 following 160 posts
Prof at Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Chair of Development and Change @devandchg.bsky.social, Canuck in Europe. Working on development economics, demography & social policy, Tibet & western China. Wrote Poverty as Ideology (2018) & other stuff.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Ex-bird algorithms didn't seem to like me, so I'm reposting here:

@devandchg.bsky.social 2024 forum issue on the political economy of global #reparations is out, with an amazing line up of leading thinkers on this issue. A must read, as antidote to politics going in the opposite direction.

🧵(1/x)
FORUM 2024: Development and Change: Vol 55, No 4
Click on the title to browse this issue
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Policy based evidence making.
atrupar.com
RFK Jr on Tylenol and autism: "It is not proof. We're doing the studies to make the proof."
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
This trope has been the right wing go-to explanation for the unequal & dysfunctional US health care system for decades now. Fox was blowing this dog whistle during Obama’s attempts to reform, as far as I recall.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
You are doing fantastic work on this Saloni. I really appreciate your correctives to the population collapse panic.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Given that the late Thandika Mkandawire was a massive inspiration for me, I am incredibly honoured to have been invited to give this memorial lecture and, now as the day approaches, also increasingly nervous about it.
tinyurl.com/Thandika-2025
Reposted by Andrew Fischer
danielagabor.bsky.social
This looks smashing
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Epic article on Palestine by @rafeefz.bsky.social just published by @devandchg.bsky.social based on her keynote at the recent AHE conference.

"Development as Erasure: Palestine, Genocide and ‘Reconstruction’"

A must read!

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Indeed, through successive tweets, I am convinced that Elmo thinks that negative growth will result in something becoming exponentially negative, rather than just dwindling out slower and slower...
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Epic article on Palestine by @rafeefz.bsky.social just published by @devandchg.bsky.social based on her keynote at the recent AHE conference.

"Development as Erasure: Palestine, Genocide and ‘Reconstruction’"

A must read!

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
My thoughts exactly.

Also, besides all the other questions with the simple correlations in the FT piece, what if the interpretation is actually the opposite? If having kids makes people more conservative? Then the opposite conclusion follows (just to say how silly it is as an argument).
Reposted by Andrew Fischer
philipncohen.com
"Progressives" and "leftists": You must understand that we have urgent problems and the most important way to address them urgently is to saddle healthy young, productive women with 30 years of intensive parenting, and spend a million dollars each, so their kids can make a difference in the future!
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
We know. And the rest of our trade is actually in deficit with the US.
Reposted by Andrew Fischer
karenguzzo.bsky.social
In case you missed this piece on Friday (or want to be reminded that humanity is not facing imminent demise), here's your chance to learn why demographers aren't panicking about low birth rates.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
As far as I can tell, Japan and South Korea are way ahead of China in per capita terms. Even Germany is ahead. Just the US is behind among those top five.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Yes, the “this is the biggest crisis of the century” crowd annoys the heck out of me. The worst is that it plays into far right Elmo politics.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Good to know. It is just that you cited econ dev and cultural contagion as the reasons, and I thought you were citing the article.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
I meant that social scientists often complain about the 2 yr IF, that it is biased towards medical & physical sci where things get cited much faster after they are pub’ed. So, there is a pref for the 5-yr bc it gives more time for getting cited. But I find it makes almost no diff to the rankings.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
The logic is that it takes longer to get cited in social sciences than in medicine or physical sciences, hence the 5-yr IF is supposed to better capture that.

So, they are averages of sorts, but of very narrow and specific date ranges.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
No, the standard JIF is literally: all cites in 2024 (only from other WoS listed journals) of articles published in 2022-23 / # of those articles.

The 5-yr IF is cites in 2024 of articles from 2019-23 / # of those articles.

So both are citations in only one year, but of different date ranges.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Although your explanatory note at the bottom isn’t very precise & gives the impression it is all citations, rather than just citations in one year.

2-year JIF is specifically citations in 2024 to articles published in 2022 & 2023. 5-yr to articles published from 2019-23.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Useful list!

Note that Development and Change @devandchg.bluesky.social, which also publishes a lot of heterodox economics articles, had a JIF of 3.2 this year.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Exactly. Massive outmigration is an expression of how bad the employment situation is, altho it’s also a response to pop pressure at household level, as more children survive to adulthood over several generations. Nepal pop will still grow for a generation, even with fertility below 2.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
I think Eric doesn’t realise that populations will continue growing for most of our lifetime even after fertility falls below replacement.

And as long as there is massive room for increasing productive and decently paid employment in the Global South, fertility concerns are not relevant.
ericlevitz.bsky.social
This just isn't true. Far-right demographic panic definitely drives some natalist advocacy. But global fertility is on the cusp of falling below replacement.

Absent major gains in automation, this is going to be a major source of economic strain during our lifetimes.
andrewmfischer.bsky.social
Not only that, poor countries have massive underemployment problems, so there is massive room for productive employment gain before any concerns of falling fertility would even become relevant. The strain is political and economic, not demographic.