Béatrice Cointe
banner
beatricecointe.bsky.social
Béatrice Cointe
@beatricecointe.bsky.social

Solar-powered Science & Technology Studies researcher and IAM ethnographer at CSI - CNRS, Mines Paris-PSL.
"Well the world of research has gone berserk, too much paperwork" (Dylan 2006)
Soundtrack: t.ly/0V77d

Economics 38%
Environmental science 16%
Pinned
"In the midst of perpetual debates on most issues of the climate change problem, one refreshing exception is the consensus on our ignorance..."

(from the report on a 1993 Workshop on Integrative assessment of mitigation, impacts and adaptation to climate change)

Exactly!
📣 New call for paper in OEconomia: "History of Climate Economics", edited by Christophe Cassen, @beatricecointe.bsky.social and Antoine Missemer.

Extended abstract submission: January 15, 2026
More info ➡️ journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/19...
History of Climate Economics
Editors of the Special Issue Christophe Cassen (CNRS, CIRED Paris) Béatrice Cointe (CNRS, CSI Paris) Antoine Missemer (CNRS, CIRED Paris) Call for Papers In 2018, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Eco...
journals.openedition.org
Now that we are likely to cross 1.5°C, there is increasing discussion on "overshoot".

There is a lot of uncertainties on overshoot, but there is one thing that we are 100% sure about:

GHG emissions need to go down >90% in decades for overshoot to be a reality.

www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/...

😆

It’s the lighting but also the fact that COPs are SO cinematographic that I wonder how “international conference movies” is not a genre in itself
The lighting on this pic makes it look a snapshot from the trailer of the Cop30 movie
1/2. “The COP of Truth cannot ignore science. 75% of carbon emissions come from fossil fuels. Today we are not even allowed to discuss pathways for a just and equitable transition away from fossil fuels.” Colombia at the close of #COP30.

Reposted by Béatrice Cointe

The lighting on this pic makes it look a snapshot from the trailer of the Cop30 movie
1/2. “The COP of Truth cannot ignore science. 75% of carbon emissions come from fossil fuels. Today we are not even allowed to discuss pathways for a just and equitable transition away from fossil fuels.” Colombia at the close of #COP30.

Reposted by Béatrice Cointe

The hierarchy is clear: 75–85% of emission reductions through 2050 come from using less fossil fuel.

CCS plays a role, but it is strictly secondary, contributing a median of just 15–25%.

Technological neutrality is a political concept, not a scientific one.

2/3

"autre chose"

moi aussi des fois j'écoute autre chose que du Dylan

fourble.co.uk/podcast/them...
Theme Time Radio Hour podcast
Bob Dylan hosts an eclectic mix of music, guests, interviews and commentary.
fourble.co.uk

Il faut, il faut.
Call for papers:

HISTORY OF CLIMATE ECONOMICS

Details at:
journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/19...

Editors of the Special Issue

Christophe Cassen (CNRS, CIRED Paris)
Béatrice Cointe (CNRS, CSI Paris)
Antoine Missemer (CNRS, CIRED Paris)

Deadline for abstracts : January 15th, 2026
History of Climate Economics
Editors of the Special Issue Christophe Cassen (CNRS, CIRED Paris) Béatrice Cointe (CNRS, CSI Paris) Antoine Missemer (CNRS, CIRED Paris) Call for Papers In 2018, the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Eco...
journals.openedition.org

Reposted by Béatrice Cointe

“[Negative emissions] should not be an argument in favour of doing nothing now and switching on this technology if climate change turns out to be a significant problem.”

-Kenneth Möllersten

Listen now: overshootpod.com
De la place - et de l'invisibilisation - des compagnes chez les classiques de la sociologie

ThanksForTyping … and the fieldwork
the role of sociologists’ wives in classic British studies

Rosalind Edwards et Val Gillies

👀

tidsskrift.dk/Serendipitie...

The picture below is inadvertent scenography, but it would make a great addition to my collection of COP Pavillion pictures.

www.csi.minesparis.psl.eu/en/featured-...
The Pacific Islands pavillion at COP30 just had to close due to flooding. Seriously...

But it’s also possible I’m reading too much into it!

yes, Jae Edmonds too was in Villach and is still around, but I don't think he signed this one.

I could be wrong but I don't think IAMC has issued such a statement before, so I read it also as a sign of dissatisfaction with established routes such as the IPCC or EU projects policy briefs, where they are very well-represented: even those who are audible don't feel listened to anymore.

Oui !

2) The boldness of the Villach statement prompted the creation of the IPCC, with the US keen to put governments at the table so as to keep the scientists in check.

That this new statement comes from the community closely tied to the IPCC, and influence within it, is quite a wake-up call.

Two additional observations:
1) 40 years apart, I don't think there is any overlap in signatories, but in many ways its the same lineage, and the same "epistemic community" to use the technical term - esp. with IIASA remaining a centrepiece of this scientific climate diplomacy.

Reposted by Fabián Muniesa

40 years after the Villach Conference Statement, climate scientists gathered at an international conference issue their assessment of the situation.

cc @allouryesterdays.bsky.social

Reposted by Béatrice Cointe

November 17, 1980 – International meeting about carbon dioxide build up.

“The first major initiative to result from the establishment of the WCP was an international conference on climate change, held in Villach, Austria, from 17 to 22 November 1980.

allouryesterdays.info/2022/11/16/n...
November 17, 1980 - International meeting about carbon dioxide build up. - All Our Yesterdays
On this day in 1980 an international gathering of scientists took place in Villlach, Austria. “The first major initiative to result from the establishment of the WCP was an international conference on...
allouryesterdays.info

(I now know AMOC is not the same as the Gulf Stream but obviously did not when I was 15) (but for some reason* we had the SPM for the IPCC SAR synthesis report lying around at home.)

*one of my uncles was in Kyoto with the French delegation

When I was in high school, I asked my physics teacher if it was true there was a risk that the Gulf Stream might collapse due to climate change. Her reply was “oh but this is a whole lotta bullshit”, and since it’s all I remember about her, I guess I must have been 🤨.

Anyway, here we are now.
Is the Atlantic Ocean circulation close to tipping?
Hear the latest science as I presented it last month at the ATLAS25 event in Helsinki.
Let me know if anything is unclear, or if you see good reasons why your government shouldn't immediately act on this. 🌊
youtu.be/ULJXqOZuY-8
Is the Atlantic Ocean circulation close to tipping?
YouTube video by Earth System Analysis - Potsdam Institute
youtu.be
Is the Atlantic Ocean circulation close to tipping?
Hear the latest science as I presented it last month at the ATLAS25 event in Helsinki.
Let me know if anything is unclear, or if you see good reasons why your government shouldn't immediately act on this. 🌊
youtu.be/ULJXqOZuY-8
Is the Atlantic Ocean circulation close to tipping?
YouTube video by Earth System Analysis - Potsdam Institute
youtu.be
We’re often asked whether we’re optimistic or pessimistic about technologies. That’s the wrong question. If any of this matters, we need to stop seeing technology like the weather, to be merely forecasted, and instead see it like politics, to be collectively shaped.
Búzios Scientific Statement

100 climate researchers, coordinated by @pik-potsdam.bsky.social & @iiasa.ac.at, released a joint statement to inform the #COP30 negotiations and provide guidance on difficult but doable global efforts designed to limit dangerous overshoot of 1.5°C as much as possible.
Búzios Scientific Statement.pdf
drive.google.com

Reposted by Béatrice Cointe

🟢 HCR ou ne pas être, telle est la question

Ce mercredi est parue comme chaque année la liste des #HighlyCitedResearchers

Lauranne Chaignon revient sur ses origines et sa crédibilité face aux tentatives de manipulation

themeta.news/lauranne-cha...

#VeilleESR

Yes, thanks!
So it’s Obersteiner & Möllersten indeed - their proposal was already a critique of the strategic and valuation frameworks that underpinned climate action, ironically it ended up feeding exactly what they were up against… (I have a chapter coming up on it, now stuck in editorial limbo)

Just out of curiosity (I don’t have access), who are they referring to as « the scientists who popularised carbon capture »? Is Obersteiner among them?