Author | Lightnews

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 3h

Regardless. Giving us less for the same price is just a more decieving way of hiking the price. It is toxic and hurts everyone in the long run, including the environment with more left over packaging.

1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 13h

Can't ask him about it, he won't know anything.

3 4

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 14h

2 4

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 14h

Without access, stores will claim profit losses and hike prices to misfortune everyone else for their sales loss.

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 15h

If his lack of knowledge or awareness as a Speaker is that impeded to where he never knows current events, then perhaps he is not fit for the position. Offer it to another republican for all I care, first and foremost, reopen the government. He doesn't have a plan, replace him with anyone who does.

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 15h

The House of Representatives holds power to discipline members for failure to perform their duties (such as refusing to negotiate terms for reopening the government without having a valid reason). All you need is a motion to vacate then censure. He needs to be replaced if this country is to exist.

1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 15h

It's going to be more than that. Without the food benefit funding, a lot of families won't be buying the same food. This counts towards sales decreases. Which in turn will cause a price hike to make up for sales losses. Now it isn't just lower class suffering, it's lower and middle class.

1 2

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 15h

Not even just that. SNAP/food stamps fuel the economy. It's money that stores are getting from people who otherwise wouldn't/can't buy the food. Stores will see a decrease in sales. They are going to hike prices to make up for it. So this doesnt just effect people who were on benefits.

1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 16h

It's not a negotiation. Dem house brought to the floor a standalone bill to help SNAP and WIC, nothing else, no strings. It was voted against by the same people who are keeping the government shut down.

1 2

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 16h

And here's the thing. SNAP benefits the economy, not just the people enrolled. When stores don't have people using these benefits, sales are gping to drop. They are going to try justifying a price hike to make up for loses.

2

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 20h

Also, because without the snap benefit users buying things in the store, stores will sell less and claim they need to increase prices to make up for losses. All prices go up the moment we stop helping people live affordably. Then nothing is affordable to anyone. I support always helping.

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 20h

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 1d

If you think that food stamps is bad, you couldn't be more wrong. If you think it won't effect you. Try again.

With food stamps gone, there will be a huge decrease in sales at your grocery store. Stores don't like losing money, to make up for that, hope you like increased prices to make up for it.

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 1d

Pennsylvania too

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 2d

Other states are doing it too. I know i at least saw Pennsylvania too. Someone should pool them together in a thread.

1 1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 2d

Could have sworn that they were demonizing video games and anime. Then they go and use pokemon and video game references left and right (usually in illegal copyright ways).

3

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 3d

Results can be;
1) free healthcare, lower costs for everyone
2) no free healthcare, cost spreads to everyone
3) no free healthcare and if you don't want to share the cost, then all hospitals go bankrupt and then no care for anyone.

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 3d

And the worse they are, the more it costs. Take away the healthcare and they will hold off until they dont have a choice, meaning really big bills that they won't pay and they dont have healthcare to take it, so that gets spread to everyone.

1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 3d

They won't just take a loss because that is a bad business tactic and they will end up going under. So they have to make that up somewhere, so they will spread it to everyone who is covered and increase bills for everyone. People who don't have health care don't go to the hospital until they are bad

1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 3d

For anyone thinking free healthcare is bad. You are dead wrong. When you go to the doctor and your insurance covers you, that is great. Hospitals can't refuse care. So people without coverage owe money, if they don't have healthcare to cover that, the hospitals take a loss.

1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 4d

To be fair though, if the current potus was dead, he woupd probably also do better than he currently is.

1

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 4d

Siphoning is illegal, but under the legal defense of "necessity" or "defense of others", preventing a kidnap would likely be legally justifiable. The threat of a kidnapping would be considered a greater harm than the protential damage caused by siphoning gas. Legal systems favor life over property.

2

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 4d

Hear me out. It is legal to take action to protect someone. If you see ICE members leave their vehicle to go kidnap someone, we should siphon the gas out of their vehicle. It is not physically threatening them and it is a force enough to protect the person who's rights are being violated.

1 2

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 4d

Yes, it is. And we need to repeatedly let trump know that he isnt in power and these other people are. So that he gets more and more pissed off. Repeatedly remind him he is useless and not making any of the calls.

User not found @brokenuser.bsky.social · 5d

Documents show this, where are the documents? He's never released other important documents. Until he releases everything, nothing said is true. Not in the epstein files? Prove it, release them, unless you are then we understand why he won't. These people rigged things? Prove it, unless they didn't.