celarson.bsky.social
LightNews LightNews
celarson.bsky.social
@celarson.bsky.social
72 followers 580 following 1 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by celarson.bsky.social
djolder.bsky.social
If I have to explain to you why it's a bad idea to use a machine that makes shit up 15-80% of the time AND destroys the environment AND contributes to rising fascism and genocide AND puts brilliant skillful creatives out of work by stealing their work, then we're already speaking different languages
August 6, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Reposted by celarson.bsky.social
stcymsn.bsky.social
Wow we’re having “games are art” discourse again! Just gonna leave this here.

From my dissertation:
2.1 Lenses, Not Boxes I wondered whether this section was necessary, but games discourse seems to repeatedly find itself adrift in questions of whether _ counts as a _. We have seen the question repeatedly: Do games count as art? Do games without goals count as games? Is The Sims a game? Are hypertexts interactive fiction? Are Twine pieces literature? In fairness to the researchers cited here, all of whom I respect immensely, many of these sources pose or imply the question rhetorically. Still, the necessity of such a framing frustrates me. "Is _ a _?" is, in my opinion, a fruitless question. The question can never be answered to anyone's satisfaction, and it often serves as either a provocation to espouse politics or as a cover to institute gatekeeping. Its agenda is usually opaque to onlookers and bewildering to those trying to advance the field from across disciplines. We should be thinking in lenses, not boxes. It is always more interesting to ask "If we think of _ through the lens of _, what do we learn?" We know it is more interesting to ask "What do we learn by considering Tom Stoppard through the lens of poststructuralism?" than to ask "Is Stoppard's work poststructuralist?" And while some works may be more or less fruitful when examined through different lenses, sometimes the most unlikely pairings of lenses and objects are the most rewarding. Certainly any of the questions above would be much better served by reframing them in this way.
August 4, 2025 at 12:17 AM
Reposted by celarson.bsky.social
georgetakei.bsky.social
Putin is full out celebrating our idiocy.
A tweet by Michael McFaul (@McFaul) that reads: "In 2012, when I was the US ambassador to Russia, Putin shut down USAID inside Russia. Why? Because their work supported free markets, democracy, human rights — ie causes that threatened Putin's dictatorship. Shutting down USAID is exactly what autocrats all over the world want."
February 3, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Reposted by celarson.bsky.social
nocontexttrek1.bsky.social
Zoomed out we see a small, lone shuttlecraft flying through a cloudy sky. Closed caption reads, "(screaming)"
November 7, 2024 at 5:23 PM
Reposted by celarson.bsky.social
lukeplunkett.com
this means we've got 30 mins of extra time then penalties
November 5, 2024 at 11:04 PM
Reposted by celarson.bsky.social
jacobtlevy.bsky.social
Here's a thought: a set of ethics guidelines for the Supreme Court, enacted by Congress not as an enforceable law but as a standing guideline for impeachment.

As a bonus, this model could be extended to, say, emoluments clause regulation of the president.
July 28, 2023 at 7:32 PM
Reposted by celarson.bsky.social
jasonschreier.bsky.social
2010: Elon Musk is the real-life Tony Stark
2023: Elon Musk is the real-life Mr. Bean
July 24, 2023 at 2:02 PM