Creative Rights Coalition
@crcadvocacy.bsky.social
37 followers 12 following 18 posts
Creative Rights Coalition (CRC): A volunteer-based Discord community advocating for creative rights, advancing ethics, and reducing exploitation and harms.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
The House just advanced §43201 (Sub. C, Title IV), AKA the 10 year ban on state AI laws: thehill.com/homenews/hou...

It's now time to reach out to your Senators!

Wondering how? See: 5calls.org/issue/ai-reg...

Or feel free to use the card below.
FIND your Senator
- Go to senate.gov > Senators > Contact Your Senators > pick your state.
E-MAIL (about 3 min)
- Click "Contact" beneath each Senator's photo.
- Subject: Oppose §43201 (AI Preemption) – E&C FY-25 House Concurrent Resolution 14
- Copy or edit:
	- My name is <NAME>, and I live in ZIP Code <12345>. Section 43201 would bar every state and municipality from passing AI safeguards for ten years, yet offers no federal framework. It is extraneous to budget policy and violates federalism (Wyeth/Lohr). Please support a Byrd-Rule point of order or vote to strike §43201 from the bill. Thank you.
CALL (about 1 min)
- Dial 202-224-3121 and ask for Senator <Last Name>.
- Script: Hello, I am <NAME> from <CITY/ZIP>. Please support striking AI-law preemption in Section 43201, Subtitle C of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget-reconciliation draft under House Concurrent Resolution 14. It is extraneous under the Byrd Rule and harms states' duty to protect the public, rights holders, and creators.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
bencollins.bsky.social
Fascinating to finally see some AI skepticism from... CNN? Let's go???

www.cnn.com/2025/05/30/b...
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
ednewtonrex.bsky.social
If you're in the UK, please sign this open letter asking the government to correct the misleading claims they made in the AI & copyright consultation.

They said copyright law is currently unclear on this point, which is false. This misled the public.

openletter.earth/uk-governmen...
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
Have you followed up?

This is still with the Senate! A regulatory moratorium preempting state laws is not a budgetary matter, and this subsection can still be stricken/removed, but senators need to know it exists, and that people care!

bsky.app/profile/crca...
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
The House just advanced §43201 (Sub. C, Title IV), AKA the 10 year ban on state AI laws: thehill.com/homenews/hou...

It's now time to reach out to your Senators!

Wondering how? See: 5calls.org/issue/ai-reg...

Or feel free to use the card below.
FIND your Senator
- Go to senate.gov > Senators > Contact Your Senators > pick your state.
E-MAIL (about 3 min)
- Click "Contact" beneath each Senator's photo.
- Subject: Oppose §43201 (AI Preemption) – E&C FY-25 House Concurrent Resolution 14
- Copy or edit:
	- My name is <NAME>, and I live in ZIP Code <12345>. Section 43201 would bar every state and municipality from passing AI safeguards for ten years, yet offers no federal framework. It is extraneous to budget policy and violates federalism (Wyeth/Lohr). Please support a Byrd-Rule point of order or vote to strike §43201 from the bill. Thank you.
CALL (about 1 min)
- Dial 202-224-3121 and ask for Senator <Last Name>.
- Script: Hello, I am <NAME> from <CITY/ZIP>. Please support striking AI-law preemption in Section 43201, Subtitle C of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget-reconciliation draft under House Concurrent Resolution 14. It is extraneous under the Byrd Rule and harms states' duty to protect the public, rights holders, and creators.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
parismarx.com
labour is buying into the hype in the hope of getting some of the investment going into the AI machine without really asking whether there are tangible results on the other side. this strategy is doomed.
politico.eu
The Labour government’s plan for economic growth, public service reform, and thus its electoral hopes, rest on the country adopting AI.

But its strategy of breathlessly bigging up bleeding-edge AI and pursuing massive data center investments is not cutting through to voters, MPs fear.
Labour’s AI gold rush gets stuck in the mud
Ministers are preparing a string of AI announcements for early June, but voters are skeptical about the technology. That leaves the ruling Labour Party with a huge problem.
ow.ly
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
kortizart.bsky.social
If you cannot run your business by following simple laws, you don’t have a business, you have a racket.
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
Nick Clegg says asking artists for use permission would kill the AI industry: www.theverge.com/news/674366/...

Then maybe it shouldn't be an industry that exists in its current form?

For hailing from such "innovation-focused" spaces, you would think they could innovate an ethical model.
“I just don’t know how you go around, asking everyone first. I just don’t see how that would work,” Clegg said. “And by the way if you did it in Britain and no one else did it, you would basically kill the AI industry in this country overnight.”
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
ednewtonrex.bsky.social
Peter Kyle, to Parliament last week: “I’ve not used the word uncertainty” [to describe how copyright law applies to AI].

Also Peter Kyle, 6 months ago: “That is why we are setting out a balanced package of proposals to address uncertainty about how copyright law applies to AI”.

1/2
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
isobelstarling.bsky.social
Artists don't create so that Tech bros can profit while we don't.
Creation is our livelihood,
our only way of making a living.
And this mofo wants us to sit down so him and his AI bros can profit?
Nick Clegg can eat a bag of dicks.
AI is a parasite.
It's an industry that needs to be killed.
ednewtonrex.bsky.social
Nick Clegg is wrong to say artists’ demands on AI & copyright are unworkable.

Every argument he makes could equally have been made about Napster - e.g. ‘but the tech is already out there!’

These are not reasons not to uphold the law and treat creators fairly.

www.thetimes.com/uk/technolog...
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
simonbrew.bsky.social
My plans for a major retail emporium are being threatend by wholesalers who won't let me steal the stock.
A headline from The Times, with Nick Clegg saying that requiring permission from copyright holders to train AI on their word would 'kill' the AI industry. Boo fecking hoo.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
phantasy.bsky.social
I know I don't usually touch political stuff but like heyyyy.... I would have a hard time forgiving myself if this went through and I didn't try to do anything about it. Let's send the email together, yeah?
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
The House just advanced §43201 (Sub. C, Title IV), AKA the 10 year ban on state AI laws: thehill.com/homenews/hou...

It's now time to reach out to your Senators!

Wondering how? See: 5calls.org/issue/ai-reg...

Or feel free to use the card below.
FIND your Senator
- Go to senate.gov > Senators > Contact Your Senators > pick your state.
E-MAIL (about 3 min)
- Click "Contact" beneath each Senator's photo.
- Subject: Oppose §43201 (AI Preemption) – E&C FY-25 House Concurrent Resolution 14
- Copy or edit:
	- My name is <NAME>, and I live in ZIP Code <12345>. Section 43201 would bar every state and municipality from passing AI safeguards for ten years, yet offers no federal framework. It is extraneous to budget policy and violates federalism (Wyeth/Lohr). Please support a Byrd-Rule point of order or vote to strike §43201 from the bill. Thank you.
CALL (about 1 min)
- Dial 202-224-3121 and ask for Senator <Last Name>.
- Script: Hello, I am <NAME> from <CITY/ZIP>. Please support striking AI-law preemption in Section 43201, Subtitle C of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget-reconciliation draft under House Concurrent Resolution 14. It is extraneous under the Byrd Rule and harms states' duty to protect the public, rights holders, and creators.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
digelsrud.bsky.social
Thank you @adamconover.net for the update and apology.

Like most humans, we can all make mistakes. You accepted responsibility for platforming con-artists and recovered nicely. 👍🏻👍🏻. Well done!

#TheFutureIsHuman 💪🏻

youtu.be/eDsSg-Xm1ms
Why I Became a Crypto Shill
YouTube video by Adam Conover
youtu.be
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
reuel-clive.bsky.social
DEAR AMERICANS!

CALL YOUR SENATORS IN ORDER TO STOP THE 10 YEAR STATE BAN ON REGULATING AI!

CALL TODAY!

IF YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DO IT... PLEASE REFER TO @crcadvocacy.bsky.social 's guide!

#PROTECTCOPYRIGHT

#VOTENOONTHEBILL
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
Thank you for pointing this out!

Full link below:

GOP House passes Donald Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' after marathon session: thehill.com/homenews/hou...
thehill.com
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
emorykj-art.bsky.social
I called my Senators today, left a message. If you've never done this before, 5calls is a really great resource, and made this very easy. Your senators need to listen to you; that's their entire job, even if it doesn't feel like it these days.
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
The House just advanced §43201 (Sub. C, Title IV), AKA the 10 year ban on state AI laws: thehill.com/homenews/hou...

It's now time to reach out to your Senators!

Wondering how? See: 5calls.org/issue/ai-reg...

Or feel free to use the card below.
FIND your Senator
- Go to senate.gov > Senators > Contact Your Senators > pick your state.
E-MAIL (about 3 min)
- Click "Contact" beneath each Senator's photo.
- Subject: Oppose §43201 (AI Preemption) – E&C FY-25 House Concurrent Resolution 14
- Copy or edit:
	- My name is <NAME>, and I live in ZIP Code <12345>. Section 43201 would bar every state and municipality from passing AI safeguards for ten years, yet offers no federal framework. It is extraneous to budget policy and violates federalism (Wyeth/Lohr). Please support a Byrd-Rule point of order or vote to strike §43201 from the bill. Thank you.
CALL (about 1 min)
- Dial 202-224-3121 and ask for Senator <Last Name>.
- Script: Hello, I am <NAME> from <CITY/ZIP>. Please support striking AI-law preemption in Section 43201, Subtitle C of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget-reconciliation draft under House Concurrent Resolution 14. It is extraneous under the Byrd Rule and harms states' duty to protect the public, rights holders, and creators.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
jessalyncrimson.bsky.social
And here’s *another* topic that 5 Calls provides a script for.
I know it’s a ton that these fucks are throwing all at once. I struggle with getting the spoons for these calls too.
But that’s their plan; drown us in gut punches. But if we don’t stop them here it gets tons harder.
Make the calls.
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
The House just advanced §43201 (Sub. C, Title IV), AKA the 10 year ban on state AI laws: thehill.com/homenews/hou...

It's now time to reach out to your Senators!

Wondering how? See: 5calls.org/issue/ai-reg...

Or feel free to use the card below.
FIND your Senator
- Go to senate.gov > Senators > Contact Your Senators > pick your state.
E-MAIL (about 3 min)
- Click "Contact" beneath each Senator's photo.
- Subject: Oppose §43201 (AI Preemption) – E&C FY-25 House Concurrent Resolution 14
- Copy or edit:
	- My name is <NAME>, and I live in ZIP Code <12345>. Section 43201 would bar every state and municipality from passing AI safeguards for ten years, yet offers no federal framework. It is extraneous to budget policy and violates federalism (Wyeth/Lohr). Please support a Byrd-Rule point of order or vote to strike §43201 from the bill. Thank you.
CALL (about 1 min)
- Dial 202-224-3121 and ask for Senator <Last Name>.
- Script: Hello, I am <NAME> from <CITY/ZIP>. Please support striking AI-law preemption in Section 43201, Subtitle C of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget-reconciliation draft under House Concurrent Resolution 14. It is extraneous under the Byrd Rule and harms states' duty to protect the public, rights holders, and creators.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
kortizart.bsky.social
Folks, the House advanced the disastrous reconciliation bill, with the destructive 10-year State Ban against regulations for AI intact!

We now MUST mobilize our calls to the Senate! Call today!

If you need a script the post below offers a fantastic alternative!

We only have one chance! Lets go!
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
The House just advanced §43201 (Sub. C, Title IV), AKA the 10 year ban on state AI laws: thehill.com/homenews/hou...

It's now time to reach out to your Senators!

Wondering how? See: 5calls.org/issue/ai-reg...

Or feel free to use the card below.
FIND your Senator
- Go to senate.gov > Senators > Contact Your Senators > pick your state.
E-MAIL (about 3 min)
- Click "Contact" beneath each Senator's photo.
- Subject: Oppose §43201 (AI Preemption) – E&C FY-25 House Concurrent Resolution 14
- Copy or edit:
	- My name is <NAME>, and I live in ZIP Code <12345>. Section 43201 would bar every state and municipality from passing AI safeguards for ten years, yet offers no federal framework. It is extraneous to budget policy and violates federalism (Wyeth/Lohr). Please support a Byrd-Rule point of order or vote to strike §43201 from the bill. Thank you.
CALL (about 1 min)
- Dial 202-224-3121 and ask for Senator <Last Name>.
- Script: Hello, I am <NAME> from <CITY/ZIP>. Please support striking AI-law preemption in Section 43201, Subtitle C of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget-reconciliation draft under House Concurrent Resolution 14. It is extraneous under the Byrd Rule and harms states' duty to protect the public, rights holders, and creators.
crcadvocacy.bsky.social
The House just advanced §43201 (Sub. C, Title IV), AKA the 10 year ban on state AI laws: thehill.com/homenews/hou...

It's now time to reach out to your Senators!

Wondering how? See: 5calls.org/issue/ai-reg...

Or feel free to use the card below.
FIND your Senator
- Go to senate.gov > Senators > Contact Your Senators > pick your state.
E-MAIL (about 3 min)
- Click "Contact" beneath each Senator's photo.
- Subject: Oppose §43201 (AI Preemption) – E&C FY-25 House Concurrent Resolution 14
- Copy or edit:
	- My name is <NAME>, and I live in ZIP Code <12345>. Section 43201 would bar every state and municipality from passing AI safeguards for ten years, yet offers no federal framework. It is extraneous to budget policy and violates federalism (Wyeth/Lohr). Please support a Byrd-Rule point of order or vote to strike §43201 from the bill. Thank you.
CALL (about 1 min)
- Dial 202-224-3121 and ask for Senator <Last Name>.
- Script: Hello, I am <NAME> from <CITY/ZIP>. Please support striking AI-law preemption in Section 43201, Subtitle C of the Fiscal Year 2025 budget-reconciliation draft under House Concurrent Resolution 14. It is extraneous under the Byrd Rule and harms states' duty to protect the public, rights holders, and creators.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
apraxvalith.bsky.social
Nothing about the U.S. budget is a done deal. It just passed the House, but it needs to survive the Senate with zero changes. ZERO. Or it goes back to the House + they have to vote all over again.

If you have a Republican Senator you need to be holding a flamethrower to their ass rn. Lock in.
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition
zacharyberger.bsky.social
Made a cheat sheet to help you with the calling process. There is info on how to find out who to call, script ideas, and hopefully everything else you'll need. Feel free to share or offer suggestions! docs.google.com/document/d/1...
Reposted by Creative Rights Coalition