Cre8Fire
@cre8fire.bsky.social
I am a programmer, political junkie, and wolf aficionado.
Pissed off left-leaning independent. Pissed off and independent because Republicans are stupid and Democrats are spineless.
Pissed off left-leaning independent. Pissed off and independent because Republicans are stupid and Democrats are spineless.
Pinned
Cre8Fire
@cre8fire.bsky.social
· Feb 13
We all want to know what to do, but none of us is willing to accept the answer to "What is left that we can do?". So...
Following is what to do to prepare for this LITERALLY becoming the 4th Reich. This is dark to contemplate, but it's historically accurate resistance tactics for the worst case.
Following is what to do to prepare for this LITERALLY becoming the 4th Reich. This is dark to contemplate, but it's historically accurate resistance tactics for the worst case.
Let me disavow you of a few current myths.
1. Republican support for Trump is not fading. 90% Rs approve, same as Jan 20th.
2. No, Rs are not starting to understand economics.
3. No, it's not obvious to them.
4. Yes, the propaganda still works.
Not myth:
A 13 point drop in independent support.
1. Republican support for Trump is not fading. 90% Rs approve, same as Jan 20th.
2. No, Rs are not starting to understand economics.
3. No, it's not obvious to them.
4. Yes, the propaganda still works.
Not myth:
A 13 point drop in independent support.
November 25, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Let me disavow you of a few current myths.
1. Republican support for Trump is not fading. 90% Rs approve, same as Jan 20th.
2. No, Rs are not starting to understand economics.
3. No, it's not obvious to them.
4. Yes, the propaganda still works.
Not myth:
A 13 point drop in independent support.
1. Republican support for Trump is not fading. 90% Rs approve, same as Jan 20th.
2. No, Rs are not starting to understand economics.
3. No, it's not obvious to them.
4. Yes, the propaganda still works.
Not myth:
A 13 point drop in independent support.
Have you noticed how our media just moves on from huge stories, without so much as a look back?
That's because there are no longer consequences. Bad publicity used to change things - now it's just another news cycle.
"Fake news" is an excuse to ignore - pretend it isn't real.
Propaganda works.
That's because there are no longer consequences. Bad publicity used to change things - now it's just another news cycle.
"Fake news" is an excuse to ignore - pretend it isn't real.
Propaganda works.
November 25, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Have you noticed how our media just moves on from huge stories, without so much as a look back?
That's because there are no longer consequences. Bad publicity used to change things - now it's just another news cycle.
"Fake news" is an excuse to ignore - pretend it isn't real.
Propaganda works.
That's because there are no longer consequences. Bad publicity used to change things - now it's just another news cycle.
"Fake news" is an excuse to ignore - pretend it isn't real.
Propaganda works.
Reposted by Cre8Fire
Dear Europe,
Pick one of your leaders with a quick wit who can stand being on Trump's "bad side" for a while.
Have them ask publicly ask if Trump and Russia worked together on the "peace deal", because it looks like Ukrainian surrender and makes Trump look weak and pathetic. Insult his manhood.
Pick one of your leaders with a quick wit who can stand being on Trump's "bad side" for a while.
Have them ask publicly ask if Trump and Russia worked together on the "peace deal", because it looks like Ukrainian surrender and makes Trump look weak and pathetic. Insult his manhood.
November 22, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Dear Europe,
Pick one of your leaders with a quick wit who can stand being on Trump's "bad side" for a while.
Have them ask publicly ask if Trump and Russia worked together on the "peace deal", because it looks like Ukrainian surrender and makes Trump look weak and pathetic. Insult his manhood.
Pick one of your leaders with a quick wit who can stand being on Trump's "bad side" for a while.
Have them ask publicly ask if Trump and Russia worked together on the "peace deal", because it looks like Ukrainian surrender and makes Trump look weak and pathetic. Insult his manhood.
The United States of America should never be in the business of telling a free people they should surrender.
They need ammo, not a lawyer.
We don't achieve peace through capitulation, we fight and win wars on behalf of free people.
Our current actions are against our history and character.
They need ammo, not a lawyer.
We don't achieve peace through capitulation, we fight and win wars on behalf of free people.
Our current actions are against our history and character.
November 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM
The United States of America should never be in the business of telling a free people they should surrender.
They need ammo, not a lawyer.
We don't achieve peace through capitulation, we fight and win wars on behalf of free people.
Our current actions are against our history and character.
They need ammo, not a lawyer.
We don't achieve peace through capitulation, we fight and win wars on behalf of free people.
Our current actions are against our history and character.
Eyes on the Ukraine situation...
We need to walk and chew gum and piggy needs public pressure to back off this nonsense "peace deal". A LOT of pressure. I know there are multiple fronts, but that one is important - we can't miss sinister moves on while he plays nice with Mamdani.
We need to walk and chew gum and piggy needs public pressure to back off this nonsense "peace deal". A LOT of pressure. I know there are multiple fronts, but that one is important - we can't miss sinister moves on while he plays nice with Mamdani.
November 22, 2025 at 4:31 AM
Eyes on the Ukraine situation...
We need to walk and chew gum and piggy needs public pressure to back off this nonsense "peace deal". A LOT of pressure. I know there are multiple fronts, but that one is important - we can't miss sinister moves on while he plays nice with Mamdani.
We need to walk and chew gum and piggy needs public pressure to back off this nonsense "peace deal". A LOT of pressure. I know there are multiple fronts, but that one is important - we can't miss sinister moves on while he plays nice with Mamdani.
I'm not sure why Hegseth is so worried about this, his white supremacist tattoos aren't swastikas.
November 21, 2025 at 9:09 PM
I'm not sure why Hegseth is so worried about this, his white supremacist tattoos aren't swastikas.
They are worried about the stories of the little boys coming out.
Think MAGA will abandon them for that? I do.
I'm not sure which is worse - that they are pedos or that they they may be right in this sick society that they don't have to be as worried about being outed as heterosexual pedos.
Think MAGA will abandon them for that? I do.
I'm not sure which is worse - that they are pedos or that they they may be right in this sick society that they don't have to be as worried about being outed as heterosexual pedos.
November 21, 2025 at 8:43 PM
They are worried about the stories of the little boys coming out.
Think MAGA will abandon them for that? I do.
I'm not sure which is worse - that they are pedos or that they they may be right in this sick society that they don't have to be as worried about being outed as heterosexual pedos.
Think MAGA will abandon them for that? I do.
I'm not sure which is worse - that they are pedos or that they they may be right in this sick society that they don't have to be as worried about being outed as heterosexual pedos.
"Salvador Mundi". DaVinci Painting. Money laundering. Saudi Royal Family. Trump. Epstein. Yemen. Congress. Dmitry Rybolovlev
www.npr.org/sections/the...
www.npr.org/sections/the...
November 21, 2025 at 3:12 AM
"Salvador Mundi". DaVinci Painting. Money laundering. Saudi Royal Family. Trump. Epstein. Yemen. Congress. Dmitry Rybolovlev
www.npr.org/sections/the...
www.npr.org/sections/the...
Taps the sign. 👇👇
I know we are focused on the Joint Chiefs, but the most dangerous purge we need to be aware of from last night was of the Judge Advocate Generals (JAGS). They make determinations about what is and is not a constitutional order. There's a good reason we don't want loyalists in those positions.
November 21, 2025 at 1:25 AM
Taps the sign. 👇👇
If one more person says what Trump's actions SHOULD prompt, I am going to scream.
Unless and until you have something to say about what IS going to happen, STFU.
There's no magical enforcement mechanism for a bad president that just blossoms out a unicorn's ass.
They control enforcement.
Unless and until you have something to say about what IS going to happen, STFU.
There's no magical enforcement mechanism for a bad president that just blossoms out a unicorn's ass.
They control enforcement.
November 20, 2025 at 11:32 PM
If one more person says what Trump's actions SHOULD prompt, I am going to scream.
Unless and until you have something to say about what IS going to happen, STFU.
There's no magical enforcement mechanism for a bad president that just blossoms out a unicorn's ass.
They control enforcement.
Unless and until you have something to say about what IS going to happen, STFU.
There's no magical enforcement mechanism for a bad president that just blossoms out a unicorn's ass.
They control enforcement.
Thanks, General.
For what it’s worth, as a commander and officer it was my duty, moral obligation, and legal requirement to first question and then to not obey any illegal order I was given.
The same is true for everyone who swear their oath.
Hope that clears things up.
The same is true for everyone who swear their oath.
Hope that clears things up.
November 20, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Thanks, General.
Reposted by Cre8Fire
100%. These weren't released from the files the FBI has, but the FBI has these and didn't act on them. Well, any actions are not public, at least. Cover up.
The fact that the estate released files that implicate Donald Trump, files that the DOJ/FBI have, proves that Pamela Jo Bondi and Kash Patel are actively involved in a criminal cover-up.
The Epstein files released today did not come from the DOJ's Epstein Files. They came from Epstein's estate. Pam Bondi is still protecting Trump at all costs. Today's release by Democrats was aimed at undermining her efforts. And to make it harder for Donald to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell.
November 13, 2025 at 8:38 PM
100%. These weren't released from the files the FBI has, but the FBI has these and didn't act on them. Well, any actions are not public, at least. Cover up.
Reposted by Cre8Fire
At the same time the NY Times was hyping Hillary Clinton's emails, it had a reporter with emails from Jeffrey Epstein that were highly damaging to Trump.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
November 13, 2025 at 5:44 PM
At the same time the NY Times was hyping Hillary Clinton's emails, it had a reporter with emails from Jeffrey Epstein that were highly damaging to Trump.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
The more NYT apologists try to minimize this the clearer it becomes that they don't understand why much of the public doesn't trust legacy media.
The amount of unrelated nonsense in this bill is disgusting.
We have GOT to come up with better cages for our congresscritters. Rules. I mean rules.
We have GOT to come up with better cages for our congresscritters. Rules. I mean rules.
November 13, 2025 at 1:24 AM
The amount of unrelated nonsense in this bill is disgusting.
We have GOT to come up with better cages for our congresscritters. Rules. I mean rules.
We have GOT to come up with better cages for our congresscritters. Rules. I mean rules.
218 for a discharge petition. Wow, pretty unheard of.
But:
1. It has to pass the House as a whole. (and all the procedural votes to get there)
2. It has to pass the Senate (and assorted votes there)
3. It then goes to the President for signature. (Yeah, right.)
4. Override = 290 in H and 57 S
But:
1. It has to pass the House as a whole. (and all the procedural votes to get there)
2. It has to pass the Senate (and assorted votes there)
3. It then goes to the President for signature. (Yeah, right.)
4. Override = 290 in H and 57 S
November 13, 2025 at 12:31 AM
218 for a discharge petition. Wow, pretty unheard of.
But:
1. It has to pass the House as a whole. (and all the procedural votes to get there)
2. It has to pass the Senate (and assorted votes there)
3. It then goes to the President for signature. (Yeah, right.)
4. Override = 290 in H and 57 S
But:
1. It has to pass the House as a whole. (and all the procedural votes to get there)
2. It has to pass the Senate (and assorted votes there)
3. It then goes to the President for signature. (Yeah, right.)
4. Override = 290 in H and 57 S
They've been stealing the tariff money.
Change my mind.
Change my mind.
November 12, 2025 at 10:50 PM
They've been stealing the tariff money.
Change my mind.
Change my mind.
I can not stress the importance of this enough, especially RIGHT NOW.
Stop using the language of the rapist.
It is not sex with children, it is rape of children.
It is not underage girls, it is children.
It is not sex trafficking, it is rape trafficking.
It is not sex with children, it is rape of children.
It is not underage girls, it is children.
It is not sex trafficking, it is rape trafficking.
November 12, 2025 at 10:26 PM
I can not stress the importance of this enough, especially RIGHT NOW.
Right now, dirt that has been gathered on Republicans is being wielded against them to keep them from voting yes.
Expect fireworks. I think most have decided their exposure is less than the damage of covering up for him any more.
Expect fireworks. I think most have decided their exposure is less than the damage of covering up for him any more.
November 12, 2025 at 7:45 PM
Right now, dirt that has been gathered on Republicans is being wielded against them to keep them from voting yes.
Expect fireworks. I think most have decided their exposure is less than the damage of covering up for him any more.
Expect fireworks. I think most have decided their exposure is less than the damage of covering up for him any more.
Why are so many rich men pedophiles?
One reason is because when one has all the money to buy whatever one wants, one starts to want what money shouldn't be able to buy. People like Epstein provide, and record for leverage. Then broker to intelligence, mafia, the person -whoever can pay up the most.
One reason is because when one has all the money to buy whatever one wants, one starts to want what money shouldn't be able to buy. People like Epstein provide, and record for leverage. Then broker to intelligence, mafia, the person -whoever can pay up the most.
November 12, 2025 at 5:11 PM
Why are so many rich men pedophiles?
One reason is because when one has all the money to buy whatever one wants, one starts to want what money shouldn't be able to buy. People like Epstein provide, and record for leverage. Then broker to intelligence, mafia, the person -whoever can pay up the most.
One reason is because when one has all the money to buy whatever one wants, one starts to want what money shouldn't be able to buy. People like Epstein provide, and record for leverage. Then broker to intelligence, mafia, the person -whoever can pay up the most.
Reposted by Cre8Fire
Ahead of Veterans Day, I was honored to welcome a flight of veterans and their families as they arrived in DC.
November 11, 2025 at 1:08 PM
Ahead of Veterans Day, I was honored to welcome a flight of veterans and their families as they arrived in DC.
A rare moment of majority support in both parties and among independents - sanction Russia more, and arm Ukraine more.
November 11, 2025 at 4:56 PM
A rare moment of majority support in both parties and among independents - sanction Russia more, and arm Ukraine more.
I dunno... it's fairly on brand. Quite a difference between perception of the brand and the "branding", but this pain of the corporate democrats seizing defeat from the jaws of victory is ANYTHING but new, sadly.
Because this is a brand-destroying action by Senate Dems.
Interesting that NY gov Kathy Hochul felt compelled to put out a statement against Dems' deal to end the shutdown
November 11, 2025 at 1:43 AM
I dunno... it's fairly on brand. Quite a difference between perception of the brand and the "branding", but this pain of the corporate democrats seizing defeat from the jaws of victory is ANYTHING but new, sadly.