David Spurrett
banner
doctorspurt.bsky.social
David Spurrett
@doctorspurt.bsky.social

Philosopher, working on evolution of mechanisms of action selection, and their variously situated subversion. https://davidspurrett.com/

Philosophy 23%
Psychology 21%
Pinned
Hello new followers. I'm a philosopher of cognitive science working on a book called 'Engines of Hostility'. Recent papers that inform the book are:
(1) "Hostile Scaffolding" (Timms & Spurrett)
(2) "Fashioning Affordances" (Spurrett & Brancazio)
(3) "On Hostile and Oppressive Affective Technology."

I have sometimes recommended accept without revisions as a reviewer. I can't remember any as author...
Again it is something that people in previous eras have commented on but I still find it just astonishing to witness in my own: fascism is somehow the natural ideology of loser men, just all of our most pathetic and contemptible instincts rendered into a worldview.
imagine letting these people run anything more consequential than a lemonade stand

www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Elon Musk admits cheating at video games, chat transcript appears to show
Video posted by top gamer shows what he says is X conversation in which billionaire admits ‘account boosting’
www.theguardian.com
Senator Susan Collins killed the amendment to protect the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) -- perhaps the world's premier research center for work on #weather, #climate, models, and remote sensing. Remember that.

Reposted by David Spurrett

ICE officers are publicly stating that Renee Good was killed not because an officer was threatened but because they were made at her for not instantly following every order issued.

The new ICE threat to protestors is:

"Have you not learned? This is why we killed that lesbian bitch."
“We Killed That Lesbian B*tch”: ICE Uses Renee Good’s Death as Threat
Protesters are recounting federal agents using Good’s death to warn them off.
newrepublic.com

Reposted by David Spurrett

NRDC @nrdc.org · 4d
Trump’s EPA just announced they are no longer going to factor in the economic benefit of saving lives when setting air pollution standards—only the cost to industry. This goes directly against their own mandate to protect public health.
E.P.A. to Stop Considering Lives Saved When Setting Rules on Air Pollution
www.nytimes.com

Good to hear it. 👏
We're no longer posting on twitter. Since we wanted to ensure our authors continue to receive as much coverage as possible for their work, we can now also be found on linkedin:
www.linkedin.com/company/brit...
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | LinkedIn
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science | 4 followers on LinkedIn. Journal of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science, published by University of Chicago Press | Founded in 1950, the B...
www.linkedin.com

No, I don't. (Same goes for "Get Out", etc.) But they may be trying to optimise something other than rigor.

Full disclosure - I'm pretty sure I laughed a lot more than anyone else in the cinema at "One Battle After Another".

It was regularly hilarious, but also often scary and thrilling. The category itself is an oddity. ("Get Out" was nominated in the same category, BTW. Looking at a list, I see that "The Apartment" won it in 1960, and "The Graduate" in '67. All had humour, none 'merely' comedy...)

This is why philosophers get paid so much.

Thank you - I wasn't aware of that!

Those conversations were so useful to me too! You'll hopefully see some of the impact of them in the discussion of interests in my final chapter.

I agree.
"We are very well aware of the fact that X for Grok is now offering a spicy mode showing explicit sexual content.

This is not spicy. This is illegal. This is appalling. This is disgusting.

I can confirm we are very seriously looking into this matter."

— Spokesperson @thomasregnier.ec.europa.eu

I'm no expert but my understanding is his political thought is largely in other texts. He was political editor of 'Les Temps Modernes' for c7 years, regular political essays, and the books 'Humanism and Terror' and 'Adventures of the Dialectic'. (He was just the first example that came to mind.)

Reposted by David Spurrett

Modeled reconstruction of December #Arctic sea ice volume since the year 1901 - comparison between PIOMAS-20C and PIOMAS data sets now updated through 2025 (new record low)...

Data information available at doi.org/10.1175/JCLI...

I'm in no way disagreeing with the (absolutely correct) point that switching to selling harassment, hate and child porn is not an improvement, but a move to monetize. (Or the one made elsewhere that harassing women out of public forums is a feature not a bug.)

I'm guessing part of the plan is to be able to throw individual subscribers under the bus on a case by case basis if there are charges and lawsuits. (Hence the move to a 'users own their prompts and the outputs responding to them' TOS.) If I'm right, then maybe platform-premium user conflict looms?

e.g. Merleau-Ponty was seriously politically engaged, and (inter alia) argued phenomenologically against authoritarianism. But the textbook Merleau-Ponty of the 4E canon is often curiously apolitical. I like the idea that translational work enlarges discussion by including more colleagues. /6-fin

Not only that, it is sometimes *ahead* of the canon it was outside. Liao and Brinner describe the 'translational' work as "expressing insights from one in the language
familiar to the other." This can include being less procrustean about important founding texts and thinkers. /5

feminists on the effects of restrictive clothing, and asked myself something like 'how does this related to embodied cognitive science' as though some further step was needed. Then I switched to realising/accepting that the work (already) WAS embodied cogsci, just outside the canon. /4

... sense that it expresses insights from people centrally concerned with cognition, yet outside cogsci (notably feminists, critical race theorists, disability theorists...). I wrestled with this myself for a while, often with the question posed in an unhelpful way. For example, I read early ... /3

Worth reading for pros and curious outsiders/adjacents. It was fun discussing an early version at the Scaffolding Bad Working Group last year, and cool to see the text. I like the whole paper, but single out for now the insight that (most?) Critical 4E CogSci is 'translational' in the ... /2
"Critical 4E Cognitive Science" by @liao.shen-yi.org and Zoe Brinner is forthcoming in 'Philosophy Compass' and up as a preprint at Phil Archive. This is a *really* useful and lucid overview of recent work on downsides/bad-sides of 4E cognition. /1
philpapers.org/rec/LIACEC-2
Shen-yi Liao & Zoe Brinner, Critical 4E Cognitive Science - PhilPapers
According to 4E cognitive science, our cognitive capacities depend on, and have been transformed by, the environments we have made. Most early works of 4E cognitive science tend to focus on ...
philpapers.org
Now only paying subscribers can make violent non-consenual sexual imagery of women and children -
Grok turns off image generator for most users after outcry over sexualised AI imagery www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Grok turns off image generator for most users after outcry over sexualised AI imagery
X to limit editing function to paying subscribers after platform threatened with fines and regulatory action
www.theguardian.com

Reposted by David Spurrett

This use of Grok isn't personal perversion but political terrorism: it's designed to silence women, make us retreat from public life.

Exemplified by the digital desecration of the body of Renee Good: someone prompted Grok to deepfake a bikini on her corpse.

"You're next" is the message to women.

Update: Sent the letter in this morning. 20+ colleagues signed. (As far as I can tell, that is basically everyone who opened the email, plus a few more who got it forwarded.)
Amanda Gorman wrote this poem for Renee Good and that’s it for me tonight.