Doesn’t fix things entirely, but it’s better
Doesn’t fix things entirely, but it’s better
I met him through his work on the diffuse interstellar bands. Every time we interacted, he was kind, encouraging, and happy to chat with a then-young PhD student (me). 🔭☄️
news.uchicago.edu/story/donald... 🧪🔭
I met him through his work on the diffuse interstellar bands. Every time we interacted, he was kind, encouraging, and happy to chat with a then-young PhD student (me). 🔭☄️
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
Take your first step with @cambridgeastro.bsky.social’s Summer Internship Programme and gain 8 weeks of research experience.
Applications from underrepresented groups in astronomy are encouraged.
Apply by 27 February 👇
https://bit.ly/4qYR0LD
Take your first step with @cambridgeastro.bsky.social’s Summer Internship Programme and gain 8 weeks of research experience.
Applications from underrepresented groups in astronomy are encouraged.
Apply by 27 February 👇
https://bit.ly/4qYR0LD
- ‘the Universe’ the specific case, the one we live in and observe
vs
- ‘a universe’ as a wider class, being an examples that is hypothetical, simulated or has different properties from the real one
?
- ‘the Universe’ the specific case, the one we live in and observe
vs
- ‘a universe’ as a wider class, being an examples that is hypothetical, simulated or has different properties from the real one
?
Consider some examples from outside astronomy:
‘the Hoover machine’ became ‘a hoover’
‘Wellington’s boots’ vs ‘wellingtons’
‘Stliton’ gave us ‘stilton cheese’
Consider some examples from outside astronomy:
‘the Hoover machine’ became ‘a hoover’
‘Wellington’s boots’ vs ‘wellingtons’
‘Stliton’ gave us ‘stilton cheese’
Better analogies are the Moon vs a moon, the Galaxy vs a galaxy, the Solar System vs other planetary systems etc.
Better analogies are the Moon vs a moon, the Galaxy vs a galaxy, the Solar System vs other planetary systems etc.
I would prefer the field to switch to the grammatically correct ‘hot jupiter’, ‘mini neptune’ etc. Capitals should indicate the specific prototype, not a general class.
#exoplanets
I would prefer the field to switch to the grammatically correct ‘hot jupiter’, ‘mini neptune’ etc. Capitals should indicate the specific prototype, not a general class.
#exoplanets
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
☄️ #extragalactic #AAS247
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
☄️ #extragalactic #AAS247
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/content/arti...
www.science.org/content/arti...
The budget does provide some funding for technology development of a future replacement mission. #planetsci 🔭🧪
The budget does provide some funding for technology development of a future replacement mission. #planetsci 🔭🧪
Learn more about Science's 2025 #BOTY and the runners-up: https://scim.ag/3MGESjx
Learn more about Science's 2025 #BOTY and the runners-up: https://scim.ag/3MGESjx
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
The closing date for applications to be the next Editor-in-Chief of MNRAS is Friday week: 9th January 2026. Interested? Visit ras.ac.uk/mnras-eic for more information. @royalastrosoc.bsky.social
The closing date for applications to be the next Editor-in-Chief of MNRAS is Friday week: 9th January 2026. Interested? Visit ras.ac.uk/mnras-eic for more information. @royalastrosoc.bsky.social
Read my last #AGU2025 story (for now!) at @science.org: tinyurl.com/4dd67hhw
Read my last #AGU2025 story (for now!) at @science.org: tinyurl.com/4dd67hhw
The Observatory article is a reprint of the Pop Ast piece, and says it is an 'abstract' of the AAS talk - but is paper length. Was Pop Ast peer reviewed in those days?
The Observatory article is a reprint of the Pop Ast piece, and says it is an 'abstract' of the AAS talk - but is paper length. Was Pop Ast peer reviewed in those days?
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...