Esther
@esther000.bsky.social
Animal lover, luv & care for city park cats, keep up with political news, cultures, nature, and artistic folks. Enjoy yard/flowers/feeding the birds/ squirrels. NO MAGA!!
Reposted by Esther
While Trump murders people on boats for supposedly trafficking drugs, Jonathan Braun, a convicted drug trafficker serving a 10 year sentence he pardoned in 2021, will be sentenced in court today after he sexually assaulted a woman after Trump freed him from prison.
November 10, 2025 at 3:15 PM
While Trump murders people on boats for supposedly trafficking drugs, Jonathan Braun, a convicted drug trafficker serving a 10 year sentence he pardoned in 2021, will be sentenced in court today after he sexually assaulted a woman after Trump freed him from prison.
This comment treats subsidies as the problem when they’re actually the symptom. The real burden isn’t created by people receiving support—it’s created by a system where prices grow unchecked and wages can’t keep up. Fix the inputs, and the subsidies become less necessary.
Comer: "This is a fake economy. You can't have 1/3 of America receiving some type of free government healthcare and then have another 1/3 that's getting a subsidized rate. That falls on the final 1/3 that's having to pay increased premiums."
November 10, 2025 at 4:44 PM
This comment treats subsidies as the problem when they’re actually the symptom. The real burden isn’t created by people receiving support—it’s created by a system where prices grow unchecked and wages can’t keep up. Fix the inputs, and the subsidies become less necessary.
Reposted by Esther
Comer: "This is a fake economy. You can't have 1/3 of America receiving some type of free government healthcare and then have another 1/3 that's getting a subsidized rate. That falls on the final 1/3 that's having to pay increased premiums."
November 10, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Comer: "This is a fake economy. You can't have 1/3 of America receiving some type of free government healthcare and then have another 1/3 that's getting a subsidized rate. That falls on the final 1/3 that's having to pay increased premiums."
Prevention deserves a central place in our healthcare model, but no nation succeeds in prevention by relying solely on individual lifestyle choices. It takes policy: accessible primary care, early testing, environmental health, and community resources that make healthy living feasible.
Rep. John McGuire: "We need to rethink healthcare in America. It needs to be a preventative healthcare system, not a reactive, put-a-bandaid-on system that we have...you cannot exercise your way out of bad nutrition. Eat right, exercise right, lead a healthy lifestyle, & maybe have early screenings"
November 10, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Prevention deserves a central place in our healthcare model, but no nation succeeds in prevention by relying solely on individual lifestyle choices. It takes policy: accessible primary care, early testing, environmental health, and community resources that make healthy living feasible.
Reposted by Esther
Rep. John McGuire: "We need to rethink healthcare in America. It needs to be a preventative healthcare system, not a reactive, put-a-bandaid-on system that we have...you cannot exercise your way out of bad nutrition. Eat right, exercise right, lead a healthy lifestyle, & maybe have early screenings"
November 10, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Rep. John McGuire: "We need to rethink healthcare in America. It needs to be a preventative healthcare system, not a reactive, put-a-bandaid-on system that we have...you cannot exercise your way out of bad nutrition. Eat right, exercise right, lead a healthy lifestyle, & maybe have early screenings"
Invoking a December vote sounds good on air, but healthcare affordability requires more than symbolic milestones. People struggling with premiums and prescriptions need assurances that this won’t be another procedural gesture that leads nowhere.
Shaheen on Fox & Friends: "I believe there are number of Republicans who are gonna join us in trying to address healthcare costs ... we are gonna be able to continue to right about healthcare because we're gonna have a vote in December."
November 10, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Invoking a December vote sounds good on air, but healthcare affordability requires more than symbolic milestones. People struggling with premiums and prescriptions need assurances that this won’t be another procedural gesture that leads nowhere.
Reposted by Esther
Shaheen on Fox & Friends: "I believe there are number of Republicans who are gonna join us in trying to address healthcare costs ... we are gonna be able to continue to right about healthcare because we're gonna have a vote in December."
November 10, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Shaheen on Fox & Friends: "I believe there are number of Republicans who are gonna join us in trying to address healthcare costs ... we are gonna be able to continue to right about healthcare because we're gonna have a vote in December."
In an age where information moves instantly and voters expect authenticity, the inability to engage openly with the public isn’t just a weakness—it’s a fundamental gap. Communication isn’t a bonus trait for leaders anymore; it’s the job description.
It should be a basic minimum requirement of political leadership that you be an effective and persuasive communicator in the current era, able to tour the country to support your candidates and policies in public forums with real people. If you can’t do that, you aren’t a leader.
November 10, 2025 at 2:12 PM
In an age where information moves instantly and voters expect authenticity, the inability to engage openly with the public isn’t just a weakness—it’s a fundamental gap. Communication isn’t a bonus trait for leaders anymore; it’s the job description.
Reposted by Esther
It should be a basic minimum requirement of political leadership that you be an effective and persuasive communicator in the current era, able to tour the country to support your candidates and policies in public forums with real people. If you can’t do that, you aren’t a leader.
November 10, 2025 at 2:11 PM
It should be a basic minimum requirement of political leadership that you be an effective and persuasive communicator in the current era, able to tour the country to support your candidates and policies in public forums with real people. If you can’t do that, you aren’t a leader.
This feels like a perfect illustration of how legacy institutions can undermine themselves. A moment that should have been about shared cultural joy gets overshadowed by leadership scrambling over a controversy that shouldn’t have carried this level of weight.
Just absolutely classic BBC. You've just broadcast the most successful programme of the year, uniting Gen Z kids online and Boomers on broadcast in a return to appointment television. And instead of celebrating, your DG reigns due to a made-up right-wing scandal.
November 10, 2025 at 2:11 PM
This feels like a perfect illustration of how legacy institutions can undermine themselves. A moment that should have been about shared cultural joy gets overshadowed by leadership scrambling over a controversy that shouldn’t have carried this level of weight.
Reposted by Esther
Just absolutely classic BBC. You've just broadcast the most successful programme of the year, uniting Gen Z kids online and Boomers on broadcast in a return to appointment television. And instead of celebrating, your DG reigns due to a made-up right-wing scandal.
November 9, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Just absolutely classic BBC. You've just broadcast the most successful programme of the year, uniting Gen Z kids online and Boomers on broadcast in a return to appointment television. And instead of celebrating, your DG reigns due to a made-up right-wing scandal.
It’s interesting to hear that leadership was kept in the loop while still publicly distancing themselves. It highlights the tension between behind-the-scenes coordination and the need for public positioning when the stakes are high.
KILMEADE: Schumer says he's voting no. Did you do this outside leadership?
SHAHEEN: No. We kept leadership informed throughout.
SHAHEEN: No. We kept leadership informed throughout.
November 10, 2025 at 2:10 PM
It’s interesting to hear that leadership was kept in the loop while still publicly distancing themselves. It highlights the tension between behind-the-scenes coordination and the need for public positioning when the stakes are high.
Reposted by Esther
KILMEADE: Schumer says he's voting no. Did you do this outside leadership?
SHAHEEN: No. We kept leadership informed throughout.
SHAHEEN: No. We kept leadership informed throughout.
November 10, 2025 at 1:27 PM
KILMEADE: Schumer says he's voting no. Did you do this outside leadership?
SHAHEEN: No. We kept leadership informed throughout.
SHAHEEN: No. We kept leadership informed throughout.
If there truly are ‘great ideas,’ withholding them from the very people whose lives will be shaped by these decisions doesn’t inspire confidence. Healthcare policy isn’t a strategy surprise; it’s something that demands clarity long before subsidies disappear.
BARTIROMO: How do you want this to play out once the ACA subsidies expire?
DR OZ: We have lots of great ideas, but I don't want to show our cards. As the president often says, why would I telegraph to you what we're gonna do?
DR OZ: We have lots of great ideas, but I don't want to show our cards. As the president often says, why would I telegraph to you what we're gonna do?
November 10, 2025 at 2:09 PM
If there truly are ‘great ideas,’ withholding them from the very people whose lives will be shaped by these decisions doesn’t inspire confidence. Healthcare policy isn’t a strategy surprise; it’s something that demands clarity long before subsidies disappear.
Reposted by Esther
BARTIROMO: How do you want this to play out once the ACA subsidies expire?
DR OZ: We have lots of great ideas, but I don't want to show our cards. As the president often says, why would I telegraph to you what we're gonna do?
DR OZ: We have lots of great ideas, but I don't want to show our cards. As the president often says, why would I telegraph to you what we're gonna do?
November 10, 2025 at 2:04 PM
BARTIROMO: How do you want this to play out once the ACA subsidies expire?
DR OZ: We have lots of great ideas, but I don't want to show our cards. As the president often says, why would I telegraph to you what we're gonna do?
DR OZ: We have lots of great ideas, but I don't want to show our cards. As the president often says, why would I telegraph to you what we're gonna do?
Moments like this highlight a troubling disparity: those most impacted by these policies seldom have the means to shape them. Until the mechanics of influence shift, decisions will continue to reflect the preferences of those with the greatest financial leverage.
The Dems who are caving are doing so not because their base wants them to, not because the voters want them to, and not because SNAP recipients want them to. They are caving because their DONORS want them to. And that’s really all that ever matters to the establishment.
November 10, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Moments like this highlight a troubling disparity: those most impacted by these policies seldom have the means to shape them. Until the mechanics of influence shift, decisions will continue to reflect the preferences of those with the greatest financial leverage.
Reposted by Esther
The Dems who are caving are doing so not because their base wants them to, not because the voters want them to, and not because SNAP recipients want them to. They are caving because their DONORS want them to. And that’s really all that ever matters to the establishment.
November 9, 2025 at 10:11 PM
The Dems who are caving are doing so not because their base wants them to, not because the voters want them to, and not because SNAP recipients want them to. They are caving because their DONORS want them to. And that’s really all that ever matters to the establishment.
It’s surprising to hear this reduced to a matter of tactical success or failure. Some stands are taken because they are necessary, not because they promise easy wins. Treating it purely as a failed strategy overlooks the moral and constitutional stakes involved.
November 10, 2025 at 2:06 PM
It’s surprising to hear this reduced to a matter of tactical success or failure. Some stands are taken because they are necessary, not because they promise easy wins. Treating it purely as a failed strategy overlooks the moral and constitutional stakes involved.
Reposted by Esther
Sen. Angus King: "Standing up to Donald Trump didn't work"
November 10, 2025 at 1:35 PM
Sen. Angus King: "Standing up to Donald Trump didn't work"
Incredible to think that what used to be a premium technology is now cheap enough to replace lumber. Solar hasn’t just joined the mainstream—it’s undercutting it. The sun has officially become a bulk commodity.
Solar’s price drop is astonishing: panels are now 98% cheaper than when I first analyzed them in 2004.
Today, building a fence with solar can be cheaper than using wood.
Today, building a fence with solar can be cheaper than using wood.
November 10, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Incredible to think that what used to be a premium technology is now cheap enough to replace lumber. Solar hasn’t just joined the mainstream—it’s undercutting it. The sun has officially become a bulk commodity.
Reposted by Esther
Solar’s price drop is astonishing: panels are now 98% cheaper than when I first analyzed them in 2004.
Today, building a fence with solar can be cheaper than using wood.
Today, building a fence with solar can be cheaper than using wood.
November 10, 2025 at 8:10 AM
Solar’s price drop is astonishing: panels are now 98% cheaper than when I first analyzed them in 2004.
Today, building a fence with solar can be cheaper than using wood.
Today, building a fence with solar can be cheaper than using wood.
It’s striking how the timing of reelection cycles shapes the Senate’s willingness to engage in compromise. When only long-term or retiring members take the risk, it becomes clear that the broader caucus is still unsure how to navigate this moment. It’s a symptom of deeper strategic uncertainty.
None of the Dem Senators (or Democratic-caucusing) who voted yes on the CR are worried about reelection:
• Dick Durbin – IL – Retiring 2026
• Catherine Cortez Masto – NV – Up 2028
• Jacky Rosen – NV – Up 2030
• John Fetterman – PA – Up 2028
• Maggie Hassan – NH – Up 2028
1/2
• Dick Durbin – IL – Retiring 2026
• Catherine Cortez Masto – NV – Up 2028
• Jacky Rosen – NV – Up 2030
• John Fetterman – PA – Up 2028
• Maggie Hassan – NH – Up 2028
1/2
November 10, 2025 at 1:59 PM
It’s striking how the timing of reelection cycles shapes the Senate’s willingness to engage in compromise. When only long-term or retiring members take the risk, it becomes clear that the broader caucus is still unsure how to navigate this moment. It’s a symptom of deeper strategic uncertainty.
Reposted by Esther
None of the Dem Senators (or Democratic-caucusing) who voted yes on the CR are worried about reelection:
• Dick Durbin – IL – Retiring 2026
• Catherine Cortez Masto – NV – Up 2028
• Jacky Rosen – NV – Up 2030
• John Fetterman – PA – Up 2028
• Maggie Hassan – NH – Up 2028
1/2
• Dick Durbin – IL – Retiring 2026
• Catherine Cortez Masto – NV – Up 2028
• Jacky Rosen – NV – Up 2030
• John Fetterman – PA – Up 2028
• Maggie Hassan – NH – Up 2028
1/2
November 10, 2025 at 1:18 PM
None of the Dem Senators (or Democratic-caucusing) who voted yes on the CR are worried about reelection:
• Dick Durbin – IL – Retiring 2026
• Catherine Cortez Masto – NV – Up 2028
• Jacky Rosen – NV – Up 2030
• John Fetterman – PA – Up 2028
• Maggie Hassan – NH – Up 2028
1/2
• Dick Durbin – IL – Retiring 2026
• Catherine Cortez Masto – NV – Up 2028
• Jacky Rosen – NV – Up 2030
• John Fetterman – PA – Up 2028
• Maggie Hassan – NH – Up 2028
1/2
The Supreme Court resolved this more than half a century ago: the House can’t simply refuse to seat someone who has been duly elected and constitutionally qualified. If Johnson won’t administer the oath, someone else will—because precedent demands it.
Once the government reopens, precedent has already been set, if Speaker Mike Johnson refuses to swear in Adelita Grijalva, the newly elected representative from Arizona’s 7th District, someone else will. In Powell v. McCormack (1969), the
November 10, 2025 at 1:58 PM
The Supreme Court resolved this more than half a century ago: the House can’t simply refuse to seat someone who has been duly elected and constitutionally qualified. If Johnson won’t administer the oath, someone else will—because precedent demands it.
Reposted by Esther
Once the government reopens, precedent has already been set, if Speaker Mike Johnson refuses to swear in Adelita Grijalva, the newly elected representative from Arizona’s 7th District, someone else will. In Powell v. McCormack (1969), the
November 10, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Once the government reopens, precedent has already been set, if Speaker Mike Johnson refuses to swear in Adelita Grijalva, the newly elected representative from Arizona’s 7th District, someone else will. In Powell v. McCormack (1969), the