Federal Worker Rights
@fedworkerrights.bsky.social
2.3K followers 48 following 230 posts
Providing information to federal employees regarding their legal rights. Posts by attorneys at James & Hoffman, a law firm representing employees and unions (www.jamhoff.com). More information at www.federalworkerrights.com.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
RIF = reduction in force. Also known as a layoff
RIFed = terminated in a RIF
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
TRO = temporary restraining order
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
In an attached declaration, the Government sets forth how many employees have been RIFed today:
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
The Government's lead argument is that the Court should deny the TRO because employees don't face immediate harm since their terminations won't take effect for 30 or 60 days
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
Here's the error-filled table of contents of the Government's brief opposing a TRO of the shutdown RIFs
Table of contents of government brief opposing a TRO of Shutdown RIFs. Where page numbers should be, the document says, "ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED"
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
Nick Bednar's bottom line on the shutdown RIFs:
nicholasbednar.bsky.social
Overall: This is a terrible, unnecessary idea that gives the administration no leverage in bargaining. It has promised to keep doing what it has been doing for nine months: RIFing federal employees. Obviously, the administration doesn't care that this is causing a lot of pain. The public should. 7/7
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
"[A]n administration official granted anonymity to discuss the layoffs said they hit agencies including: Interior, Homeland Security, Treasury, EPA, Commerce, Education, Energy, HHS and HUD."
Reposted by Federal Worker Rights
fedworkersunited.bsky.social
🚨 BREAKING: HUD just fired 2 of the 4 civil rights attorneys who blew the whistle on illegal discrimination, political interference & the dismantling of fair housing protections.
This comes just one week after Sen. Warren called for an IG investigation. #ProtectWhistleblowers #FairHousing
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
New post: responding to OPM Director Scott Kupor on probationary employee terminations federalworkerrights.com/2025/09/15/r...
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
The case is real, but Kupor’s description of the case is not accurate. It is specific to the termination of a small number of immigration judges at DOJ.
Reposted by Federal Worker Rights
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
Are you a lawyer interested in litigating against the Trump administration in defense of federal employees? This job might be for you: www.jamhoff.com/jhrecruit/. Feel free to DM for more info.
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
This is the second case where the MSPB has certified a class for probationary federal workers who were mass fired by the Trump Administration and DOGE. We are proud to stand with them by filing this class action and will continue fighting for federal workers' rights.
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
DOI probationary class includes all DOI “employees serving in a probationary or trial period who were issued termination notices between February 14-18, 2025, in response to a January 20, 2025, guidance memorandum issued by the Office of Personnel Management.” Exceptions discussed in blog post.
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
Exciting news: our class action for fired probationary workers at the Department of Interior was just granted! DOI workers can learn more about what will happen next at federalworkerrights.com

LINK: www.reuters.com/legal/govern...
Federal Worker Rights
Visit the post for more.
federalworkerrights.com
Reposted by Federal Worker Rights
bgrueskin.bsky.social
Joe Davidson, longtime Washpost columnist, quit due to editing restrictions. He couldn't call a pay raise for fed'l employees "well deserved" or say that a hallmark of Trump’s "turbulent months in office is his widespread, ominous attack on thought, belief & speech”

www.facebook.com/story.php?st...
Blocking my column because it was too opinionated was a shock. I’ve authored many pieces over my 17 years writing the Federal Diary (renamed the Federal Insider in 2016), that were at least if not more opinionated as the now dead one. In that piece, I argued that “one hallmark of President Donald Trump’s first three, turbulent months in office is his widespread, ominous attack on thought, belief and speech.”
The piece contained specific examples, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s alarming memo supporting deportation of Columbia University pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil. Rubio said Khalil could be expelled for “expected beliefs…that are otherwise lawful.” What immigrants might believe in the future now can make them federal law enforcement targets.
Another far-reaching example I cited is Trump’s aggressive attack on speech promoting diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). His executive order commanded federal agencies to “excise references to DEI and DEIA [“A” for accessibility] principles, under whatever name they may appear.” Also, Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk, of Turkey, was abducted off the street by masked officers because she co-wrote an op-ed critical of Israel. It was a terrifying sight, caught on video, which previously would have seemed more applicable to George Orwell’s dystopian and cautionary tale against totalitarianism and thought police in is novel “1984.” This is America in 2025.
Killing that column was a death blow to my life as a Washington Post columnist. But I wrote two more articles to see if I could cope with the restrictions. That’s when I learned just how severe the policy is. In my next piece, I was not allowed to describe a potential pay raise for federal employees as “well-deserved” because of Post policy.  
As a columnist, I can’t live with that level of constraint. A column without commentary made me a columnist without a column. I also was troubled by significant inconsistencies in the implementation of the p…
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
Posted late last night regarding the Supreme Court’s RIF decision:
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
Here's our post on the Supreme Court decison permitting RIFs to move forward at 22 agencies. It's a major setback for federal employees, but many options remain open for challenging RIFs. federalworkerrights.com/2025/07/08/w...
fedworkerrights.bsky.social
Here's our post on the Supreme Court decison permitting RIFs to move forward at 22 agencies. It's a major setback for federal employees, but many options remain open for challenging RIFs. federalworkerrights.com/2025/07/08/w...