Evolutionary biologist, senior scientist at CNRS/Sorbonne Université
Interests: origins and control of infectious diseases and conspiracy theories; diversity in science; scientific publishing
https://www.normalesup.org/~fdebarre/
EN & FR
A chronology of the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic
(It is not exhaustive, but hopefully it is representative.)
🧵
In @natmed.nature.com, NIH& NIAID leaders complain about a decrease in public trust, and cite a survey pointing to the Republicain administration as responsible for the recent decrease!
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/public-confi...
In @natmed.nature.com, NIH& NIAID leaders complain about a decrease in public trust, and cite a survey pointing to the Republicain administration as responsible for the recent decrease!
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/public-confi...
The quail figure is in the next paragraph of his speech and was $800'000.
www.congress.gov/117/crec/202...
The quail figure is in the next paragraph of his speech and was $800'000.
www.congress.gov/117/crec/202...
La France ne semble plus poster ses séquences sur Genbank/ENA, donc les infos ne sont pas visibles sur les plateformes publiques de visualisation.
cov-spectrum.org/explore/Fran...
La France ne semble plus poster ses séquences sur Genbank/ENA, donc les infos ne sont pas visibles sur les plateformes publiques de visualisation.
cov-spectrum.org/explore/Fran...
www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
If not, good for you, you did not waste time with a manufactured controversy aimed to sow distrust.
For the curious, here's how lab leakers tried (and this time, failed) to generate outrage: ▫️1/6 🧵 #covidorigin
If not, good for you, you did not waste time with a manufactured controversy aimed to sow distrust.
For the curious, here's how lab leakers tried (and this time, failed) to generate outrage: ▫️1/6 🧵 #covidorigin
Some time ago, DRASTIC lab leak activists wrote that Shi Zhengli edited an article on 30 Dec 2019, that they have her IP and MAC addresses, and they could even tell the edits were from a train.
How would this even be possible? ▫️1/4
#covidorigin
archive.md/sKCPq
Some time ago, DRASTIC lab leak activists wrote that Shi Zhengli edited an article on 30 Dec 2019, that they have her IP and MAC addresses, and they could even tell the edits were from a train.
How would this even be possible? ▫️1/4
#covidorigin
archive.md/sKCPq
Some other people collaborate with the Heritage Foundation.
archive.is/2YsqA
Some other people collaborate with the Heritage Foundation.
archive.is/2YsqA
How do these spillovers happen and why are they restricted, so far, to the US?
www.aphis.usda.gov/news/agency-...
How do these spillovers happen and why are they restricted, so far, to the US?
www.aphis.usda.gov/news/agency-...
Checking new manuscripts today I reviewed a paper attributing 2 papers to me I did not write. A daft thing for an author to do of course. But intrigued I web searched up one of the titles and that's when it got real weird...
youtu.be/S0rsz3Ph7XE?...
youtu.be/S0rsz3Ph7XE?...
If not, good for you: you didn't clutter your brain with yet another Covid-origin damp squib, where innocuous data were made to look suspicious by misrepresenting a date.
For the curious, here's the story. ▫️1/9 🧵 #CovidOrigin
If not, good for you: you didn't clutter your brain with yet another Covid-origin damp squib, where innocuous data were made to look suspicious by misrepresenting a date.
For the curious, here's the story. ▫️1/9 🧵 #CovidOrigin
In this essay ⬇️, @naomioreskes.bsky.social called out issues with a 2000 paper on glyphosate.
There is now a retraction notice on the website
(but I cannot find the exact date though)
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
In this essay ⬇️, @naomioreskes.bsky.social called out issues with a 2000 paper on glyphosate.
There is now a retraction notice on the website
(but I cannot find the exact date though)
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
The case is well known, and there's basically no debate about this, even with hard-core leakers who have studied the data.
🖼️: 2021 WHO report, page 47
The case is well known, and there's basically no debate about this, even with hard-core leakers who have studied the data.
🖼️: 2021 WHO report, page 47
L’enquête d’opinion commandée par le ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur mélange actes, croyances et positions politiques, en plus de véhiculer des clichés antisémites, relève le rabbin Emile Ackermann.
L’enquête d’opinion commandée par le ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur mélange actes, croyances et positions politiques, en plus de véhiculer des clichés antisémites, relève le rabbin Emile Ackermann.