Flo Débarre
flodebarre.bsky.social
Flo Débarre
@flodebarre.bsky.social
Personal account
Evolutionary biologist, senior scientist at CNRS/Sorbonne Université
Interests: origins and control of infectious diseases and conspiracy theories; diversity in science; scientific publishing
https://www.normalesup.org/~fdebarre/
EN & FR
Dans l'email TheMetaNews du matin, Laurent Simon raconte avoir été contacté en 2015 pour être ghostwriter pour Didier Raoult.
À quel point la pratique de signer des livres grand public écrits par d'autres est-elle encore répandue parmi scientifiques et médecins ?
#revuedepresse
January 21, 2026 at 8:50 AM
January 20, 2026 at 9:15 PM
In 2021, DRASTIC published a report on the WIV database(s), including a document making a very wild (and false) claim: they would have obtained Shi Zhengli's IP & MAC addresses, and linked them to her train trip on Dec 30 to Wuhan. ▫️3/4

drive.google.com/file/d/1CCe2...
January 20, 2026 at 7:10 PM
The story started in May 2020 with a NYPost article claiming that the database had been altered by Shi Zhengli during a train ride on Dec 30, 2019 to obscure information.

In fact, an article describing this database was just published in its final form that day, amongst others. ▫️2/4
January 20, 2026 at 7:10 PM
is Genbank also down for you?
January 16, 2026 at 8:41 PM
In their paragraph, they blame Fauci for the decrease. Why is the journal accepting to publish this? It's downright a lie.
January 16, 2026 at 4:43 PM
Did they read what they cite?

In @natmed.nature.com, NIH& NIAID leaders complain about a decrease in public trust, and cite a survey pointing to the Republicain administration as responsible for the recent decrease!

www.nature.com/articles/s41...
www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/public-confi...
January 16, 2026 at 4:38 PM
Seems like Rand Paul took the figure fron the wrong paragraph of his own speech in May 2021. The NSF budget was apparently 8 billion according to Rand Paul.
The quail figure is in the next paragraph of his speech and was $800'000.

www.congress.gov/117/crec/202...
January 16, 2026 at 7:45 AM
Looks like Figure 7 from this scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?s...
January 15, 2026 at 4:25 PM
(December 2021)

xkcd.com/2557/
January 14, 2026 at 3:00 PM
Ah, I'm curious!! Is this the meteorite hypothesis, or a different one?
January 12, 2026 at 2:51 PM
Ça fait donc plus d'un mois au moins que des SARS-CoV-2 de la lignée BA.3.2* se baladent en France.

La France ne semble plus poster ses séquences sur Genbank/ENA, donc les infos ne sont pas visibles sur les plateformes publiques de visualisation.
cov-spectrum.org/explore/Fran...
January 10, 2026 at 9:08 AM
Online controversy largely arose from coordinated amplification on Twitter/X, where a small number of activist accounts generated a disproportionate share of engagement. ▫️4/6

(interactive version of the plot in the blog post link below)
January 6, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Published in Feb 2020 as a Commentary, a brief article refuted claims that SARS-CoV-2 had been engineered from RaTG13, SHC014 or MA15, or HIV.
Nothing controversial here! And the article's impact was limited. But it was targeted by FOIA requests. ▫️2/6
January 6, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Are you familiar with the story of the EMI article?

If not, good for you, you did not waste time with a manufactured controversy aimed to sow distrust.

For the curious, here's how lab leakers tried (and this time, failed) to generate outrage: ▫️1/6 🧵 #covidorigin
January 6, 2026 at 6:20 PM
It's odd for several reasons:

1) Elsewhere in the accompanying document, DRASTIC folks speculate that someone else could have made the edits.

If DRASTIC had IP and MAC linked to Shi, why still consider someone else? It's inconsistent. ▫️2/4

web.archive.org/web/20210218...
December 27, 2025 at 11:04 AM
Looking for tips and comments!

Some time ago, DRASTIC lab leak activists wrote that Shi Zhengli edited an article on 30 Dec 2019, that they have her IP and MAC addresses, and they could even tell the edits were from a train.

How would this even be possible? ▫️1/4

#covidorigin
archive.md/sKCPq
December 27, 2025 at 11:04 AM
Some people fight against the ideas promoted by the Heritage Foundation and implemented by the Trump administration.

Some other people collaborate with the Heritage Foundation.

archive.is/2YsqA
December 23, 2025 at 4:33 PM
#H5N1 : An infected herd was recently detected in Wisconsin, and genome sequencing indicates that this is yet another spillover event, making it the fourth detected one.

How do these spillovers happen and why are they restricted, so far, to the US?

www.aphis.usda.gov/news/agency-...
December 20, 2025 at 7:11 AM
Not to mention his recent claim that the US Intelligence community already knew in November 2019 that a virus had leaked from a Wuhan lab

archive.is/mb5Ff
December 8, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Slightly different story according to the Daily Mail
archive.is/9lQgM
December 4, 2025 at 8:33 AM
A June 2020 date instead of Jan collapses the entire cover-up narrative. This shows how one unverified detail, like a wrong date, can turn mundane events into viral conspiracy fuel.

"Timeline matters a lot here", had written Jesse Bloom. Will he correct this tweets and Github? ▫️8/9
archive.ph/E5C8M
December 3, 2025 at 10:34 PM
The sequences however contained mutations that clearly look derived, i.e. not compatible with being from the earliest SARS-CoV-2 viruses infecting humans -- as noted at the time, among others, by @kgandersen.bsky.social, and more recently highlighted by @zachhensel.bsky.social ▫️4/9
December 3, 2025 at 10:34 PM
In a Twitter thread and on a Github page, Jesse Bloom announced that the sequences had been received by the Chinese researchers in early 2020 / in Jan 2020.

The contaminating SARS-CoV-2 sequences were therefore potentially among the earliest ones. Were they really? ▫️3/9

github.com/jbloom/PRJNA...
December 3, 2025 at 10:34 PM
Are you familiar with the story of the Antarctica sequences?

If not, good for you: you didn't clutter your brain with yet another Covid-origin damp squib, where innocuous data were made to look suspicious by misrepresenting a date.

For the curious, here's the story. ▫️1/9 🧵 #CovidOrigin
December 3, 2025 at 10:34 PM