giuseppe cannata
@giuseppec98.bsky.social
180 followers 390 following 32 posts
PhD (sort of) researcher at Scuola Normale Superiore | EU energy and climate governance, Euro-Med relations, epistemic politics and policy learning. Also less boring stuff. More here: https://linktr.ee/giuseppe.c
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
giuseppec98.bsky.social
AI fills jobs immigrants no longer want to do
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
pollypw.bsky.social
What a day in The Hague for the #RodeLijn protest.

The largest Dutch protest in 20 years!
giuseppec98.bsky.social
you would make a great irony man
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
scharfbillig.bsky.social
Exciting Milestone: Our Report Featured in Nature! ✨

www.nature.com/articles/d41...

Happy to announce that our report on the science-for-policy interface through the eyes of professionals has been spotlighted in a correspondence published by Nature.

With Krieger, @drlmelchor.bsky.social, Almeida
In science-for-policy design, one size doesn’t fit all
Letter to the Editor
www.nature.com
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
dom-of-tronina.bsky.social
Proud of my students for their amazing work writing three blog posts as part of my Gender & Politics class last year. Check them out! ✨📖 #Gendersky

🔹 Overview of our seminar: rb.gy/yeopf4
🔹 Feminist research & transforming academia: rb.gy/yeopf4
🔹 Cyber harassment & democracy: rb.gy/kaw8wx
Exploring Gender and Politics: Insights from an Innovative Seminar on Feminist Research – Genderblog
genderblog.hu-berlin.de
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
giuseppec98.bsky.social
I jot down here some reflections on challenges in EIPM/science-for-policy.

I draw largely on my research stay at JRC in Brussels and on a really cool report on S4P ecosystems I had the chance to contribute to (check it out here if you missed it!)

publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/h...
giuseppec98.bsky.social
'Because the manosphere is not just a fringe that has become mainstream, it’s a mainstream that many liberals continue to treat as a fringe'

Great take. It's not about extremists getting out of online niches, but a reactionary backlash of a patriarchal society. And we need to deal with it as such.
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
marylou-h.bsky.social
Per chi si trova a Firenze
⬇️
eui-stg.bsky.social
🔔 Save the date for the first screening of 𝑽𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏𝒊 𝒅’𝑬𝒖𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒂!

🎬 We kick off with "Democracy Under Siege" by Oscar-nominated director Laura Nix.

🗓️ 29 January 2025 | 18:30
📍 Palazzo Buontalenti, Via Cavour 65, Florence

🎟️ Free admission—registration required!
🔗 loom.ly/UHce9wo
@eui-eu.bsky.social
giuseppec98.bsky.social
Incredibile 'sta nuova serie su M.
giuseppec98.bsky.social
I mean, luxury surveillance is the only reasonable type of surveillance I can think of.

We gotta watch out for those nasty millionaires.
giuseppec98.bsky.social
This.
epopppp.bsky.social
But now we’re in a phase shift. The recent past won’t be particularly useful for understanding the near future. I’m not sure “policy” is even particularly useful to think about in the face of bigger political shifts – democratic erosion, corrupt and reactionary courts, rising influence of oligarchs.
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
khoavuumn.bsky.social
Researcher: "We let the data speak for itself."

Earlier that day:
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
rebeccasolnit.bsky.social
I like to say I respect despair as an emotion but not an analysis. As an analysis it assumes we know what can and can't happen, and the future is both uncertain and at least to some extent what we make of it. Plus why would I give them what they want, as premature surrender? Thanks Senator Schatz.
schatz.bsky.social
Be furious be angry but despondency is what they want from us. And be very suspicious of people on the left who say “we are cooked” or whatever. Imagine the civil rights movement, or suffrage, or any movement for change, hitting a roadblock and just “saying well we are well and truly fucked now.”
giuseppec98.bsky.social
Wish I had that energy to write on working days.
giuseppec98.bsky.social
Some definitely are.
I wouldn't draw the line there, between books and non-books.
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
markrubin.bsky.social
“Where are the findings? You only provide quotes.”

New article considers qualitative researchers’ experiences of methodologically incongruent peer review feedback

Open Access: dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0...

Few quotes follow 🧵
Although peer review is one of the central pillars of academic publishing, qualitative researchers’ experiences of this process have been largely overlooked. Existing research and commentary have focused on peer reviewers’ comments on qualitative articles, which are often described as indicative of a quantitative mindset or hostility to nonpositivist qualitative research. We extend this literature by focusing on qualitative researchers’ experiences of methodologically incongruent reviewer and editor comments—comments that are incommensurate with the conceptual foundations of the reviewed research. Qualitative researchers (N = 163) from a range of health and social science disciplines, including psychology, responded to a brief qualitative survey. Most contributors reported that peer reviewers and editors universalized the assumptions and expectations of postpositivist research and reporting. Some also reported that peer reviewers and editors universalized the norms and values particular to specific qualitative approaches. Contributors were concerned that peer reviewers often accept review invitations when they lack relevant methodological expertise and editors often select peer reviewers without such expertise. In response to methodologically incongruent comments, many contributors described a process of initially “pushing back” and explaining why these comments were incongruent with their research. When this educative approach was unsuccessful, some knowingly compromised the methodological integrity of their research and acquiesced to reviewer and editor requests. Earlier career researchers especially highlighted the powerlessness they felt in the peer review process in the context of a “publish or perish” academic climate. We end by outlining contributors’ recommendations for improving the methodological integrity of the peer review of qualitative research.
giuseppec98.bsky.social
This is, for its public visibility and symbolic power, a historical event, thanks to Gisèle Pelicot's brave words and decisions through the trial.

Excerpts from the hearings are the most blatant argument against 'not all men' dismissive takes and a grim proof of rape culture pervasiveness.
rebeccasolnit.bsky.social
I don't know what justice would be, but they were all found guilty and M. Pelicot will likely never be a free man again. My editorial for the Guardian on this trial coming shortly (UK editor was waiting for me to review last changes). www.theguardian.com/world/2024/d...
Gisèle Pelicot rape trial: husband jailed for 20 years as all 51 men found guilty
Dominique Pelicot drugged his wife and invited dozens of men to rape her in their French home over nine years
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
grouchymarx57.bsky.social
“We can disagree and still love each other unless your disagreement is rooted in my oppression and denial of my humanity and right to exist”

James Baldwin
giuseppec98.bsky.social
I do have access to Google, don't mind rudeness, and I have my own reservations about Politico's editorial line and I was just curious about what propaganda bothers you – but, again, it's not that serious.

Let's leave it at that.
giuseppec98.bsky.social
Thanks for explaining yourself, but there was no need to – it's less serious than this.

On a side note, one might argue that one repost is already 'too many,' but Politico is a news outlet no worse than others for EU stuff, imho. I am sincerely curious, propaganda for what?
Reposted by giuseppe cannata
giuseppec98.bsky.social
Wait, didn't the EPP threaten to thwart the Commission deal over the appointment of a far-right EV-P just a couple of weeks ago?