Hamish Stewart
@hamishs.bsky.social
260 followers 270 following 84 posts
Analyzer evangelist and mass spectrometry enjoyer. Read about the Astral analyzer: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.3c02856
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
hamishs.bsky.social
👀 A simple optimization giving substantial benefits. A little like widening an over-tight quadrupole window to help transmission.
hamishs.bsky.social
Is a lager shandy on the list.
hamishs.bsky.social
Depends on timescale and applications I guess. MS3 is currently limited to the tribrid line, where there have been big improvements recently with parallel ion accumulation for MS3, and the new Stellar quad-ion trap where it can run 40Hz MS3.

assets.thermofisher.cn/TFS-Assets/C...
Reposted by Hamish Stewart
baybioms.bsky.social
🎉 BayBioMS turns 10! 🎉

2025 marks our 10th anniversary of Mapping Molecular Mountains.

Thus, we’re excited to invite you to the 10 Years of #BayBioMS #Symposium – a celebration of a decade of accelerating #MassSpectrometry research at the @tum.de!

🧵(1/6)
hamishs.bsky.social
We had to rewrite AGC control completely and lost some of the legacy functionality.

The eDR/multiplexed SIM implementation, while ultimately relatively simple, took quite a lot of effort to implement.
hamishs.bsky.social
One learns something every day
hamishs.bsky.social
That's interesting, I would've assumed all Exploris instruments (aside MX) would have the same rules for multiplexed SIM.

Actually surprising older "helpful" restrictions didn't stick across generations.
hamishs.bsky.social
Ah! This one's definitely aimed at Orbitrap.

For Astral analyser itself there's some debate whether multiplexing will be useful. Maybe multiple scans with different mass ranges, but usually scan averaging alone should be preferable.

Perhaps ideally the combination of Astral and OT full MS scans...
hamishs.bsky.social
I'm sorry, I don't follow. Which patent do you mean here?
hamishs.bsky.social
This paper would have been largely complete by the time the MAP-MS preprint came out, barely two months ago. A very easy oversight.

I think I'm the only one with input into both projects, and this didn't even occur to me on my reviewed.

The common root of the Boxcar method is cited however.
hamishs.bsky.social
It was simply that with high enough resolution mobility separation then one may gain sufficient selectivity in DIA without quadrupole isolation.

It's not a new concept, but mobility separators in the past weren't suitable (though there's a pasef derivative with very wide quad windows)
Reposted by Hamish Stewart
rsc.org
🎉 Today we reveal the 2025 RSC Prize winners! 🎉

Celebrating excellence across research, diversity, tech roles, apprentices and partnerships. Join us in congratulating the remarkable individuals and teams advancing chemistry for society. buff.ly/K2un4O1 #Chemistry #ChemSky
Congratulations banner from the Royal Society of Chemistry featuring a medallion with symbolic icons representing various scientific elements and achievements, surrounded by a stardust background with the text "#RSCPrizes".
Reposted by Hamish Stewart
cashwood.proteaglyco.com
Orbitrap Astral Team receive the RSC 2025 Analytical Science Horizon Prize: Robert Boyle Prize.

Interesting information about what each role does at TFS.

A good read:
www.rsc.org/standards-an...
hamishs.bsky.social
Very keen on the promise of showing what different instrument classes really mean by their intensity classification.
hamishs.bsky.social
I feel this is somewhat unfair. It's well understood that Orbitrap resolution is transient length dependent.

What allows shorter transients on the Excedion Pro MS is that we've implemented a parallel pre-accumulation process that prevents the otherwise unacceptable loss of duty cycle at such speed.