Jacob Hacker
banner
jacobhacker.bsky.social
Jacob Hacker
@jacobhacker.bsky.social

Professor of Political Science; co-director, Ludwig Program on Public Leadership, Yale Law School; co-leader, Consortium on American Political Economy (CAPE); director, Yale American Political Economy eXchange (APEX); jacobhacker.com .. more

Jacob Stewart Hacker is a professor of political science at Yale University and formerly the director of Yale's Institution for Social and Policy Studies. Hacker has written works on social policy, health care reform, and economic insecurity in the United States. .. more

Political science 41%
Economics 19%
Pinned
Here are some of the best voices -- mostly in political science but also in history, economics, law, and journalism -- on the increasingly fraught relationship between democracy and capitalism in the United States: go.bsky.app/M6p7Ahw

Anyway, please read it, and huge thanks to my brilliant coauthors and @apsrjournal.bsky.social.

Perhaps most striking, we find an inverse relationship between a state's Black population share and how well represented Black constituents are by Senators -- the opposite of expectations. This seems to reflect white racial resentment in these states, consistent with theories of "racial threat."

To investigate the sources of these disparities, we look at the roll-call votes of members of Congress. We find huge differences between Republican and Democratic MCs, with Republicans favoring white voters' preferences. We even find this when we look at split-party Senate delegations.

When Democrats control the presidency and/or the Senate, there's no disparity in favor of white voters. We base these conclusions on survey questions about specific bills that encompass a half million voters over nearly twenty years.
Is national policy more responsive to the preferences of white Americans than to those of people of color? When Republicans control the presidency and/or the Senate, yes. White voters are more likely to see legislation they support become law than are Black, Latino, or Asian American voters.

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

#OpenAccess from @apsrjournal.bsky.social -

Race, Responsiveness, and Representation in U.S. Lawmaking - https://cup.org/47BDxm1

- G. AGUSTIN MARKARIAN, @jacobhacker.bsky.social, @maclockhart.bsky.social & ZOLTAN HAJNAL

#FirstView

A very special day! Happy Birthday, congratulations, and thank you for the wonderful book.

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

My latest, in the New York Times:

I Clerked for Justice O’Connor. She Was My Hero, but I Worry About Her Legacy.

www.nytimes.com/2023/12/03/o...

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

Happy new year! I'm catching up on academic reading and wanted to flag an important new piece from @jacobhacker.bsky.social and collaborators on the current Democratic coalition and its focus on economic vs. social liberalism.

Gated link:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

1/

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

"Trump isn't finished." nytimes.com/2024/08/21/o...

This is a breakout column by Tom Edsall. His expert sources — political scientists — are united in their call of alarm. There is no phony "both sides do it." And the political press is not spared. Sean Wilentz calls theirs "a staggering failure."

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

Trump is weaponizing financial payments: here's what you can do.

"Put more bluntly: the Trump administration is trying to turn private banks into enforcers ... If banks give in, it will be an enormous and dangerous step."

www.programmablemutter.com/p/trump-is-w...

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

The recently "retired" head of Social Security's research office gives a firsthand account of DOGE marauding to
@ncpssm.bsky.social
www.ncpssm.org/entitledtokn...
Former Social Security Official Says Musk/DOGE Caused "Trauma and Chaos" at SSA - NCPSSM
Laura Haltzel is the first former Social Security Administration (SSA) official who was present for the Trump administration’s takeover of the agency to speak out publicly in an on the record intervie...
www.ncpssm.org

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

Thank you so much to @jacobhacker.bsky.social @ispsyale.bsky.social for the opportunity to have presented yesterday on my findings on inequitable health insurance barriers and potential policy interventions to promote access (even in this political climate!). A real treat to have this conversation!

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

Really excited about this online convening May 19-20 to better understand the contemporary challenges and opportunities of Democratic governance in blue trifectas. Important for housing, climate, inflation, and so much more -- especially today! Register: t.co/Pm4bIJHn1O

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

"once you understand the reality of what this bill does, it turns out to be incredibly unpopular."

6/ The key is organized efforts focused on getting and keeping the unpopular parts of the bill -- especially the Medicaid cuts -- on the agenda and mobilizing voters against them. While this will be harder today than in 2017-18, our survey suggests voters will be VERY receptive.

5/ And big unpopular policies like those cuts can break through -- even without going into effect. Think the failed ACA repeal and replace effort in 2017, which devastated Republicans in 2018. Our survey shows Senators who voted for this bill are vulnerable:

4/ This is consistent with a larger problem: the voters who need to be mobilized are generally less attentive to politics, and Republicans have proved much more adept than Democrats at dominating the kinds of media that reach less attentive voters. Even so, the Medicaid cuts have gotten attention!

3/ Now for the bad news: most voters know surprisingly little about the bill. They've heard about "no tax on tips" and "no tax on overtime"--small provisions relative to the big tax cuts for the rich (and not very helpful to most working folks).

2/ This is particularly true of Republicans--who go from 54% support of the bill to 61% opposition when they are shown how it will change the average after-tax income of households in the top 1% vs. bottom 20% of the income distribution.

Republicans' hugely unpopular bill is law; will they pay the electoral price for it they should? My research with @patrick-sullivan.bsky.social for @equitablegrowth.bsky.social has good news: voters informed about the bill's effects overwhelmingly oppose it. equitablegrowth.org/americans-in...
Americans informed about the distributional effects of Republicans’ tax and budget bill overwhelmingly oppose it
Republicans’ tax and budget bill would, if enacted, be the most regressive U.S. tax and budget law in at least the past four decades.
equitablegrowth.org

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

Reposted by Jacob S. Hacker

Sorry, @Patrick-sullivan.bsky.social also (not surprisingly) pointed this out!