John Elwood
@johnpelwood.bsky.social
3.3K followers 260 following 180 posts
Law nerd. Music fan. Serial monomaniac. Views are my own and not my firm's. Maybe not even mine.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
johnpelwood.bsky.social
The Court granted review on Hunter v. US, previewed below. Note in particular the last line of my write up.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Today's/Monday's #SCOTUS grants? Parental rights, vaccine mandates, 7th Amend. incorporation, Section 230, prison litigation, arbitration exemptions, appeal waivers, confrontation rights, tribal sovereignty, unclaimed property, qualified immunity, &Feres doctrine.

www.scotusblog.com/2025/10/the-...
The justices return — and so do the relists
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. Summer has ended at last. […]
www.scotusblog.com
johnpelwood.bsky.social
This week's installment was delayed because I had an argument in New Orleans Tuesday morning, then travelled up to Maine for Damariscotta's annual Pumpkinfest. My feed will transition from legal topics to oversized gourds shortly after 10 or 11 am.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
#SCOTUS relisted 17 cases this week! Parental rights, vaccine mandates, 7th Amend. incorporation, Section 230, prison litigation, arbitration exemptions, appeal waivers, confrontation rights, tribal sovereignty, unclaimed property, qualified immunity, AEDPA, and the ever-resilient Feres doctrine.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Sidney Stein--generally well regarded. But he developed a strong dislike of Dowd when he wasn't present and all the defendants to that point were deflecting blame on the guy not in the room.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
In an earlier trial, the judge repeatedly said "I would urge government to continue their investigation" of doctors, voicing "hope" govt "pursuing … the corrupt doctors," including Dowd. Govt indicted & case assigned to different judge. On Govt motion, 1st judge presided over case he'd "urge[d]."
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Remarkable. The government made no public filing, just emailed judge asking for restitution. Without waiting 14 days court rules provide, judge entered $8.5 restitution order on day 10 without hearing from the defendant. 2d Circuit said that was consistent with Due Process.

What will #SCOTUS do?
johnpelwood.bsky.social
My first Volokh Conspiracy post in over 11 years:

reason.com/volokh/2025/...
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Remarkable. The government made no public filing, just emailed judge asking for restitution. Without waiting 14 days court rules provide, judge entered $8.5 restitution order on day 10 without hearing from the defendant. 2d Circuit said that was consistent with Due Process.

What will #SCOTUS do?
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Wishing her a speedy recovery. By coincidence, I think my (Maine) neighbor is also there recovering from a stroke.
Reposted by John Elwood
anyuse.bsky.social
Dear pierogi man:

I am *extremely* licensed in Massachusetts and would love to try a case in Dukes county, during the two months court is in session there.

I am 5-0 for trials since they restarted after the pandemic and the last two cases I defended resulted in an award of fees for my client.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Tonight's walk. Pemaquid Point ME lighthouse.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
That is several rungs up from my business casual, which definitely involves jeans and probably an untucked shirt.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
This guy showed up in my backyard just a couple days late.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
And there they are: #SCOTUS has added transgender sports cases, a Heck v. Humphrey case, and state sovereign immunity cases.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Thursday's #SCOTUS grants? Court appears to have relisted the 3 transgender sports cases--potential blockbusters; a parental notification abortion case; 3 interesting state sovereign immunity cases; & 2 cases about using Section 1983 to challenge laws w/o vacating your conviction under them first.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Someone was saying "aha! Garnett was colleagues with one of them! Thus his view can't be trusted!" And the fact was, Garnett was colleagues with both (and indeed, is friends with both). It was nothing about the equivalency of the two job positions--it's like you're straining to be disagreeable.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Interesting that Justice Kavanaugh had two majority opinions for April and Justices Kagan and Jackson had none. They must have been assigned the ill-fated LabCorp and St. Isidore cases.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Um, Garnett was colleagues of both of them, at a small law firm in DC. Indeed, he was involved in recruiting both. From the National Law Journal, March 4, 2022:
johnpelwood.bsky.social
From Consumers Research today: Justice Kavanaugh, who called for reconsideration of nondelegation doctrine, has made his peace with the "intelligible principle" standard. He makes explicit what some have speculated: Justices think major questions doctrine has mitigated risks of expansive delegation.
Reposted by John Elwood
lawrencehurley.bsky.social
Supreme Court will have its final rulings of the term, including birthright citizenship, on Friday.
johnpelwood.bsky.social
Here's my preview of what I think may be Monday's #SCOTUS grants. They include a potential campaign finance blockbuster, where the Court may overrule a precedent about coordinated spending. Plus another election law challenge, a civ pro case, and immigration.

www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/a-bl...
A blockbuster finale looms
The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here. The Supreme Court continues to make […]
www.scotusblog.com