Kate Bevan
@katebevan.com
13K followers 1.3K following 31K posts
Cat pics, tech, ranting. Sweary. Londoner. No Christmas until after my birthday.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
katebevan.com
ha ha, fortunately she's mostly an indoor cat these days, and the bird spa isn't visible from her favourite sofa perch!
katebevan.com
Hello, little robin!
katebevan.com
or indeed as someone in the replies pointed out, a chick flick pic
katebevan.com
Honestly, the couple of hit singles Slik had in the70s are truly his finest work
katebevan.com
You don't actually give a shit about my privacy, do you?
katebevan.com
Unsolicited Slik pic
(this is for the old folk among us.)
katebevan.com
Unsolicited lick pic
katebevan.com
Unsolicited click pic
katebevan.com
Fair - nicely done reporting in that case!
katebevan.com
Unsolicited Mick pic
katebevan.com
Unsolicited flick pic
Reposted by Kate Bevan
katebevan.com
Such a good piece, and I particularly love the way Jay nails the cynical selling out that's implicit in going into places like Saudi Arabia and Dubai. "Meh, it's only four pork dishes we have to ditch from the menu, never mind."
jayrayner1.bsky.social
For the past few months, for the @ftweekend.com essay, I’ve been digging deep into the phenomenon of premium restaurant brands going global: the risks, the benefits, the way almost all of them end up serving takes on the same ingredients.

on.ft.com/3KS1Enr How high-end restaurants went global
How high-end restaurants went global
As a new generation sets out in the footsteps of Nobu and Zuma, Jay Rayner examines the rise of ‘luxe’ food chains — and whether it has come at a cost
on.ft.com
katebevan.com
Great piece. Love the way you nail the selling out that's baked in to going into places like Saudi Arabia and Dubai. Feels like this is part of a wider flattening that luxury does: same brand, same experience wherever you go, whether that's a posh hotel or a designer shop.
Reposted by Kate Bevan
erniebufflo.bsky.social
Don't feel stupid, but also, if someone helpfully tells you "that's fake," the correct response is "oh shit, let me delete this" not doubling down and disabling comments.
paleofuture.bsky.social
Don’t feel stupid if you fell for fake video. It can be really hard to tell these days. But we do have to try and be careful with what we share because there’s so much AI video out there.

It’s just the world we live in now.
katebevan.com
This pretty much applies to anything being edited, tbh. Good advice.
dszlosek.bsky.social
Excellent advice on paper review:

1. Peer reviewers are volunteers.

2. Map all comments to actions.

3. Address all comments.

4. Focus on improving your paper, instead of arguing.

5. Rarely, and only with strong defense, say no.

6. Don’t take things personally.

7. Avoid recreational revisions.
katebevan.com
they're not exactly sorry, eh
katebevan.com
My work here is done 😁
katebevan.com
Oh my God, that's so much no. Awful.
katebevan.com
Exactly - and as @soozaphone.bsky.social points out, they *didn't* spot it. It was people on social media who spotted it.
katebevan.com
yes, quite. It was everyone else who spotted it. Absolutely nobody working on the programme spotted it.
katebevan.com
“It’s a low-level mistake but nevertheless, it is indicative. It was good to spot it, because what you wouldn’t want to do is just to make some kind of egregious claim about somebody and it is defamatory.” I mean, it can't be both "low-level" and "egregious and defamatory". It was the latter.
katebevan.com
sorted now, so turning off replies. Thanks, everyone, much appreciated.