Its reason: The agency did not think Moderna compared the new vaccine to one of the best flu shots available. The company spent $750M+ on a 41,000 person study.
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/h...
Its reason: The agency did not think Moderna compared the new vaccine to one of the best flu shots available. The company spent $750M+ on a 41,000 person study.
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/h...
But that was awesome - even if I understood less than 5% of what was said, I 100% got the meaning.
This was everything that made me feel blessed for becoming part of this experiment back in 2009 🐰🏈🙏🌟.
But that was awesome - even if I understood less than 5% of what was said, I 100% got the meaning.
This was everything that made me feel blessed for becoming part of this experiment back in 2009 🐰🏈🙏🌟.
a) correcting errors in 4.5 million genomes & their phylogeny
b) improving representation of the Global South in public data
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
(thread 1/n)
a) correcting errors in 4.5 million genomes & their phylogeny
b) improving representation of the Global South in public data
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
(thread 1/n)
joshuasweitz.substack.com/p/science-ad...
joshuasweitz.substack.com/p/science-ad...
Peter mentions April, but I believe it's February!
naturehealthglobal.org/update-blame...
Peter mentions April, but I believe it's February!
1️⃣ All key pathogen data, including genomic, would fall under BDL-4
2️⃣ Hence, we should no longer share data on key pathogens
Good example of theoretical risks impeding research on real ones.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
1️⃣ All key pathogen data, including genomic, would fall under BDL-4
2️⃣ Hence, we should no longer share data on key pathogens
Good example of theoretical risks impeding research on real ones.
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
www.theguardian.com/world/2026/f...
www.theguardian.com/world/2026/f...
1) Credited for being reasonable in acknowledging the importance of (i) quiet insiders & (ii) activists in confronting cuts to science.
2) Clear on who he thinks really deserves the credit for the wins: insiders.
🧵
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
1) Credited for being reasonable in acknowledging the importance of (i) quiet insiders & (ii) activists in confronting cuts to science.
2) Clear on who he thinks really deserves the credit for the wins: insiders.
🧵
www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
bit.ly/4qmcZLB @kff.org
bit.ly/4qmcZLB @kff.org
"The best news here is that with LLM mania subsiding, there might actually be a chance for newcomers to try new things."
garymarcus.substack.com/p/sam-altman...
"The best news here is that with LLM mania subsiding, there might actually be a chance for newcomers to try new things."
garymarcus.substack.com/p/sam-altman...
🤖🍔
🤖🍔
Our friends at @ucs.org explain how authoritarianism chips away at truth piece by piece—attacking science, silencing experts, and weaponizing propaganda—and lay out what scientists can do to defend democracy, starting now. ⬇️
Our friends at @ucs.org explain how authoritarianism chips away at truth piece by piece—attacking science, silencing experts, and weaponizing propaganda—and lay out what scientists can do to defend democracy, starting now. ⬇️
Very short take home. All the variation in spike that produced the immune escape characteristics of Omicron can occur in one single persistently infected individual over the period of a year.
This is why persistent infections matter
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
Very short take home. All the variation in spike that produced the immune escape characteristics of Omicron can occur in one single persistently infected individual over the period of a year.
This is why persistent infections matter
www.cell.com/cell-reports...
It's almost like they're learning the real lessons of 2020.
It's almost like they're learning the real lessons of 2020.
Luckily - and even now, six years later - the A Team over on The Other Site is already celebrating 🙇🙏🥳.
Luckily - and even now, six years later - the A Team over on The Other Site is already celebrating 🙇🙏🥳.
I really do hope scientists understand what this means for the future of science (funding) - it's not subtle.
www.niaid.nih.gov/about/unifie...
I really do hope scientists understand what this means for the future of science (funding) - it's not subtle.
www.niaid.nih.gov/about/unifie...
6%.
Now it's, what, 2%?
Can it be any clearer?
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/29/w...
6%.
Now it's, what, 2%?
Can it be any clearer?
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/29/w...
a 🧵
www.amazon.com/Asymptomatic...
a 🧵
www.amazon.com/Asymptomatic...