Andrew Stacey
@mathforge.org
1.6K followers 440 following 2.3K posts
Mathematician: formerly academic (differential topology), currently educational (Head of Department in a UK secondary school). Side interests in Maths & Programming & Art. Website: https://loopspace.mathforge.org
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
mathforge.org
Gets my vote for the worst (ie best) pun
christianp.mathstodon.xyz.ap.brid.gy
Asked my pal from Somerset if he knew anyone capable of taking the square root of -𝑟².
"I are!" he said.
That's a proof by country diction.
Reposted by Andrew Stacey
peterrowlett.net
The call for peer reviewers is very real - if you teach maths at the upper end of school through to early university and are interested in maths content useful to people like you, please get in touch via [email protected] - thanks!

#MathsToday #UKMathsChat #ALevelMaths #MathToday #MathSky
mathforge.org
Good question!

My first thoughts are that limit blindness is a bit of a gotcha in this topic, but this might actually help with that as it forces them to properly engage with the limits.
mathforge.org
Further Maths today: used the method of differences to prove the summation of squares formula, thus also foreshadowing MoD as a more general technique.

Unfortunately, only left myself 3 minutes to do the sum of cubes.

Did it in 2.

#MathsToday #UKMathsChat #ALevelMaths
Reposted by Andrew Stacey
cantabkitty.bsky.social
Recommendations for where/how to get audiobooks that are not Amazon? (or whatever other company we have decided to cancel this week)

Yes I'm aware of my library but they don't have everything.
mathforge.org
Pretty much whoever sells ebooks also sells audiobooks, so Kobo, Google, Barnes and Noble, Apple.

Seconding LibriVox.
mathforge.org
(Audible is amazon)
mathforge.org
Surely it's "x-nought"
Reposted by Andrew Stacey
mathforge.org
Perfect tribute today
joshuajfriedman.com
One of my favorite anecdotes from THE PREHISTORY OF THE FAR SIDE: "That doesn't sound like the Jane Goodall we know."
A few days after this cartoon was published, my syndicate received a very indignant letter from someone representing the Jane Goodall Institute.
Not only did my syndicate and I both get read the Riot Act, there was a vague implication that litigation over this cartoon might be around the corner.
I was horrified. Not so much from a fear of being sued (I just couldn't see how this cartoon could be construed as anything but silly, but because of my deep respect for Jane Goodall and her well-known contributions to pri-matology. The last thing in the world I would have intentionally done was offend Dr. Goodall in any way.
Before I had a chance to write my apology, another complication arose.
The National Geographic Society contacted my syndicate and expressed a desire to reprint the cartoon in a special centennial issue of their magazine. My editor, aware of what had just occurred, declined, explaining why.
Apparently, whoever it was that sent the inquiry from National Geographic was shocked. They told my editor that "that doesn't sound like the Jane Goodall we know." They did some checking themselves, and an interesting fact was eventually discovered: Jane Goodall loved the cartoon. Furthermore, she was totally unaware that any of this "stuff" was going on. Some phone calls were made, and the cartoon was not only reprinted in the centennial issue of National Geographic, but was also used by her Institute on a T-shirt for fund-raising purposes.
I've since had an opportunity to visit Dr. Goodall at her research facility in Gombe. It's a wonderful place (sort of like right out of National Geographic).
"To refer to Dr. Goodall as a tramp is inexcusable even by a self-described 'loony' as Larson. The cartoon was incredibly offensive and in such poor taste that readers might well question the editorial judgment of running such an atrocity in a newspaper that reputes to be supplying news to persons with a better than average intelligence. The cartoon and its message were absolutely stupid." —Excerpt from the above-mentioned letter that started the ruckus
mathforge.org
Respect.
merriam-webster.com
We are thrilled to announce that our NEW Large Language Model will be released on 11.18.25.
mathforge.org
#MathsToday
mpershan.bsky.social
Gonna keep a thread of classroom things from this year until it gets boring, starting with this worked example I asked kids to analyze today. I wasn't sure about that first question -- is there constant slope? -- but a few kids said (incorretly) 'yes' and I think that gets at the heart of things.
mathforge.org
Craig Barton's experiments with genAI are interesting ... not that they will get me to start using it, but that they are more likely to mean I stop listening to what he has to say.

Which would be a shame.

(Though there's a certain irony in genAI being a gateway drug for LaTeX!)

#UKMathsChat
Reposted by Andrew Stacey
themerl.bsky.social
yeah we're into LLMs (Large Lamb-bridge Models)
A herd of sheep move across a marshy bridge.
mathforge.org
Learn how to use a spreadsheet, while reviewing basic stats from gcse.
Reposted by Andrew Stacey
dandraper.bsky.social
#MathsToday Introduced the idea of a domain with a few examples and then used this. It worked well! I felt it helped them get a ‘feel’ for things rather than getting stuck in computation. I want to build in some generalisation next lesson to have any square with a vertex on the origin. 1/2
Reposted by Andrew Stacey
davegjones.bsky.social
#extrapure first (virtual) lesson of the course. Short overview, some set theory basics using a visualiser, defn of binary operations. On to modular arithmetic. Chat blast questions work nicely to set the pace.

I will try to post each week with a summary.

#alevelmaths
mathforge.org
Thanks - couple of long drives coming up so might just tune in!
mathforge.org
(Prefixing with a "not that this would apply to me", and also a "genuinely curious about this")

I was wondering whether I could get to 5 podcasts, but as you include The Archers, do we define "podcast" to include ordinary radio shows?

Also, what's 99pi?
mathforge.org
That said, it's still important to give them a framework for that retrieval and to be checking in on it, just not in the same way as one would with "do these 500 exercises" homeworks.
mathforge.org
I feel time-pressured in lessons, so for me the retrieval happens outside in consolidation time.
mathforge.org
This means that "force" is now defined in terms of acceleration: we start with the concept of acceleration, then we note that when objects interact then their accelerations change in inverse ratio to their masses, and so the concept of "force" as "m \times a" is born.
mathforge.org
The "I'm sold" was meant slightly sarcastically, but this has been living rent-free in my brain today and the sarcasm is leeching away.

Where I'm at now is that I think your formula doesn't match your concept. You're saying that "force" is "that which causes acceleration".