Tom Studans
banner
maximumwelfare.bsky.social
Tom Studans
@maximumwelfare.bsky.social
Welfare advocate. Covered the Robodebt Royal Commission. None for me thanks
Reposted by Tom Studans
not entirely the point but this is a serious issue and these supposed representatives need to grow the fuck up
November 26, 2025 at 6:09 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
"The Australian government has at all times known that the current Nauruan president and key members of his government are seriously corrupt, and they still signed a $2.5 billion deal with him."
November 26, 2025 at 6:15 AM
It's staggeringly unlikely this stupid power will ever be used.

Congratulations to the Albanese Government and @tanyaplibersekmp.bsky.social for embarrassing themselves, for insulting the welfare and legal sectors, and wasting everyone's time for no public or political benefit whatsoever.
Sadly, they cut a deal with the Libs to indeed rush this through
November 26, 2025 at 1:44 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Sadly, they cut a deal with the Libs to indeed rush this through
November 26, 2025 at 1:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Earlier, @davidpocock.bsky.social calls out Plibersek for saying critics of the amendment (to cut ppl's welfare before they're guilty) "are on the side of rapists & murderers"

"What a way to make laws: to rush something through, point the finger at those who dare question these provisions"
November 26, 2025 at 1:29 AM
On the plus side for the government—the second item probably won't end up in the High Court any time soon.
Senate passed the Social Security Tech. Changes No. 2 Bill. Provides:
- income apportionment validation + resolution scheme
- debt waiver changes
- HA Minister can cancel payments for subjects of outstanding arrest warrants for serious violent or sexual offences parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/sea...
parlinfo.aph.gov.au
November 26, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Senate passed the Social Security Tech. Changes No. 2 Bill. Provides:
- income apportionment validation + resolution scheme
- debt waiver changes
- HA Minister can cancel payments for subjects of outstanding arrest warrants for serious violent or sexual offences parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/sea...
parlinfo.aph.gov.au
November 26, 2025 at 12:48 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Here, again, is the human cost of the government's unlawful system of payment suspensions

Constant cycles of punishment that you cannot escape - even when you're in hospital
www.kingaroy.org/invisible-ca...
November 25, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Bevan Shields has joined The Guardian
November 25, 2025 at 5:23 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Many legal & welfare groups fear this amendment will punish victims of domestic violence, particularly First Nations women

Gallagher says Centrelink has "a history of engagement" w/ these victims & will provide info to prevent them being harmed by these new powers

My goodness
November 24, 2025 at 3:07 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Minister Gallagher refuses to answer basic questions from @davidpocock.bsky.social about whether they got legal advice that giving cops these powers to cancel welfare payments is constitutional

"This is extraordinary that the government won't even confirm"
November 24, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
“This punishes people who are legally innocent, directly contradicting the presumption of innocence, a fundamental principle of Australian common law”
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
“This could force her (and any dependants) to return to the violent situation or become homeless, compounding the danger she faces. (...)
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
“Her income would be cut off at the most dangerous time in her life, without any opportunity to explain the circumstances, present evidence of the abuse she suffered, or seek legal advice. (...)
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
“If police issue a warrant for her arrest and she cannot be located because she is in hiding or in the process of fleeing, Schedule 5 would allow police to request cancellation of any social security payment(s) she receives. (...)
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
“Schedule 5 would create a dangerous mechanism for this misidentification to have immediate and severe consequences. A woman fleeing domestic violence could, for instance, be misidentified by police as a perpetrator rather than a victim” (...)
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Here’s what the experts have warned today (and might have told the government had there been any of the usual scrutiny on this dodgy amendment):
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Labor stuck this amendment onto an unrelated bill at the last minute. We had a whole inquiry looking at the bill which didn’t get to interrogate this change because Labor kept it hidden and now are trying to ram it through today. Why hide from scrutiny?
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
116 legal and policy experts have now opposed Labor’s new powers for police to recommend cutting payments from people without them even having been convicted of a crime.

Cops shouldn’t be anywhere near welfare law and Labor should withdraw this amendment. www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/treat...
November 24, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
Senator Thorpe criticises the government for ignoring these 100+ experts and groups to sneak the amendment through "without any scrutiny"

"I'd be putting my head down in shame too, Minister"
November 24, 2025 at 1:37 AM
Reposted by Tom Studans
New: 100+ legal experts, welfare groups & academics demand the Minister bin an amendment, allowing police to cancel welfare payments for people who have not been found guilty of any crime

@tanyaplibersekmp.bsky.social is trying to ram this amendment through today

Read more: archive.is/UHu9J
November 23, 2025 at 11:16 PM
November 23, 2025 at 12:28 AM
👇
November 22, 2025 at 9:53 AM
HEAD IN 69
November 22, 2025 at 9:15 AM