Over the course of the year, we published 28 articles reviewed by 59 different reviewers.
[1/3]
Over the course of the year, we published 28 articles reviewed by 59 different reviewers.
[1/3]
Led by @alexh.bsky.social and @aidybarnett.bsky.social
#AIMOS2025
Led by @alexh.bsky.social and @aidybarnett.bsky.social
#AIMOS2025
Reviewers found the question important, yet had some concerns about the small number of pubs selected and how they were chosen.
👇 Read the editorial assessment, reviews and full text now
Reviewers found the question important, yet had some concerns about the small number of pubs selected and how they were chosen.
👇 Read the editorial assessment, reviews and full text now
Reviewers consider it timely and "methodologically sound" while challenging some of the assumptions and offering suggestions.
👇 Read it here
Reviewers consider it timely and "methodologically sound" while challenging some of the assumptions and offering suggestions.
👇 Read it here
osf.io/preprints/me...
Based on two very helpful reviews from @metaror.bsky.social:
metaror.org/kotahi/artic...
More references, better discussion of unfamiliar concepts (e.g. conviviality), and more.
🧪 #metasci #compsci
osf.io/preprints/me...
Based on two very helpful reviews from @metaror.bsky.social:
metaror.org/kotahi/artic...
More references, better discussion of unfamiliar concepts (e.g. conviviality), and more.
🧪 #metasci #compsci
Reviewers consider the work "valuable and timely", noting its relevance to reform initiatives like @coarassessment.bsky.social
👇 Read the assessment, reviews & full article here
Reviewers consider the work "valuable and timely", noting its relevance to reform initiatives like @coarassessment.bsky.social
👇 Read the assessment, reviews & full article here
The reviewers support the general idea while also offering amendments and alternative solutions.
👇 Read the assessment, reviews & full article now
The reviewers support the general idea while also offering amendments and alternative solutions.
👇 Read the assessment, reviews & full article now
To me, it can become a real game changer in #ScholarlyCommunication. I got great reviews and look forward to revise my manuscript!
Both reviewers highlighted the study's importance yet also requested more information and details from the author.
👇 Read the full editorial assessment, reviews and paper on MetaROR
To me, it can become a real game changer in #ScholarlyCommunication. I got great reviews and look forward to revise my manuscript!
Both reviewers highlighted the study's importance yet also requested more information and details from the author.
👇 Read the full editorial assessment, reviews and paper on MetaROR
Both reviewers highlighted the study's importance yet also requested more information and details from the author.
👇 Read the full editorial assessment, reviews and paper on MetaROR
MetaROR partners accept MetaROR reviews as part of their editorial process, making the publishing ecosystem more efficient.
MetaROR partners accept MetaROR reviews as part of their editorial process, making the publishing ecosystem more efficient.
Reviewers liked the article yet were disappointed by the response rate. They suggested minor changes.
👇Read it now on MetaROR
Reviewers liked the article yet were disappointed by the response rate. They suggested minor changes.
👇Read it now on MetaROR
The two reviewers generally praise the ideas but ask for more detail and share some concerns.
👇 Read the editorial assessment, reviews and full paper at MetaROR
The two reviewers generally praise the ideas but ask for more detail and share some concerns.
👇 Read the editorial assessment, reviews and full paper at MetaROR
The reviewers praised the comprehensive analysis & clear presentation, while requesting more background information & addressing data availability issues.
👇 Read it now on MetaROR
The reviewers praised the comprehensive analysis & clear presentation, while requesting more background information & addressing data availability issues.
👇 Read it now on MetaROR
We are excited for all the presentations, discussions and inspiration to come and we would be more than happy to greet you at our stand 👋
www.stienid2025.org
We are excited for all the presentations, discussions and inspiration to come and we would be more than happy to greet you at our stand 👋
www.stienid2025.org
👏 Congratulations to everyone involved for producing such a great magazine!
A new digital magazine on research integrity & open science.
📖 In this issue:
✨ Launch of the Science Integrity Alliance
✨ Coverage of the U.S. Conference on Research Integrity
✨ COPE’s evolution in publication ethics
...and more!
🔗 Read here: www.sci-integrity.com/reach-inaugu...
👏 Congratulations to everyone involved for producing such a great magazine!
Indeed @metaror.bsky.social and @peercommunityin.bsky.social have a lot in common, and in fact the MetaROR model was partly inspired by the great work done by Peer Community In (PCI).
However, there are also various differences between MetaROR and PCI. Let me highlight two of them.
Indeed @metaror.bsky.social and @peercommunityin.bsky.social have a lot in common, and in fact the MetaROR model was partly inspired by the great work done by Peer Community In (PCI).
However, there are also various differences between MetaROR and PCI. Let me highlight two of them.
As part of this, "PLOS Biology will formally consider meta-research articles that are peer-reviewed on the MetaROR platform", in order to "improve transparency" and "[prevent] futile cycles of peer review".
#metaresearch #openscience 🧪
Learn more: plos.io/45wPZB9
As part of this, "PLOS Biology will formally consider meta-research articles that are peer-reviewed on the MetaROR platform", in order to "improve transparency" and "[prevent] futile cycles of peer review".
The reviewers call it "well-developed", "timely" & "important" while questioning the focus on only 5 publishers.
👇Read the assessment, reviews & author response on MetaROR
The reviewers call it "well-developed", "timely" & "important" while questioning the focus on only 5 publishers.
👇Read the assessment, reviews & author response on MetaROR
Under LJ's innovative model of scholarly communication, research is published first, then openly reviewed.
🔎: lifecyclejournal.org/about/
Under LJ's innovative model of scholarly communication, research is published first, then openly reviewed.
🔎: lifecyclejournal.org/about/
We have joined LCJ's growing group of evaluation services and will review and assess metaresearch submissions.
👇 LCJ joins our ever-increasing list of partner journals. Please find the full list in the link below
[1/2]
We have joined LCJ's growing group of evaluation services and will review and assess metaresearch submissions.
👇 LCJ joins our ever-increasing list of partner journals. Please find the full list in the link below
[1/2]