noddin0ff
@noddin0ff.bsky.social
37 followers 110 following 290 posts
Patriot. Progressive. Person. Sometimes knowledgeable. I do science for money. (https://bandcamp.com/noddin0ff)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
noddin0ff.bsky.social
If it walks like a quack, talks like a quack, it's a quack
noddin0ff.bsky.social
Nature's way of saying "Do not touch"
Reposted by noddin0ff
noddin0ff.bsky.social
Nature's way of saying, "Do not touch"
Reposted by noddin0ff
phillipspobrien.bsky.social
Just sent out this free post. Something notable has happened in the last few months (particularly since the Putin-Trump love fest in Alaska). GOP public opinion in the USA, which Trump has almost singlehandedly made Ukraine-skeptical earlier… open.substack.com/pub/phillips...
Something Interesting Is Happening With GOP Public Opinion
Hi All,
open.substack.com
noddin0ff.bsky.social
Um,,,
gtconway.bsky.social
So yesterday a reporter asked Donald Trump about the writ of habeas corpus, and he had no idea what it was.

"I don't know," he said. "I'd rather leave that to Kristi."

Well, It turns out Sen. Hassan asked Kristi Noem about it in May, and this was Noem's response:
atrupar.com
HASSAN: What is habeas corpus?

NOEM: Habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country

HASSAN: That's incorrect
Reposted by noddin0ff
jonlemire.bsky.social
NEW: Retribution is here

President Trump today called for the arrests of Illinois’ governor and Chicago’s mayor

And he has an AG who has proven pliant - as evidenced by the Comey arraignment minutes later

Inside Trump’s escalating campaign of payback: www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
Retribution Is Here
The president’s threats of revenge are no longer bluster.
www.theatlantic.com
Reposted by noddin0ff
gtconway.bsky.social
"In the moment, Trump was terrified of being convicted and still seethes at the humiliation he faced."
jonlemire.bsky.social
NEW: Retribution is here

President Trump today called for the arrests of Illinois’ governor and Chicago’s mayor

And he has an AG who has proven pliant - as evidenced by the Comey arraignment minutes later

Inside Trump’s escalating campaign of payback: www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...
Retribution Is Here
The president’s threats of revenge are no longer bluster.
www.theatlantic.com
Reposted by noddin0ff
listeninghabit.bsky.social
Algorithmic filter bubbles got you sonically pigeon-holed?

Find some new inspo among the gems on this recent discoveries playlist:

Catchy Colombian triphop, stone-cold jazz, rewarding underground rap, international funk grooves, transcendent bangers, and more.

bandcamp.com/veaukab/play...
Listening Habit - Recent Finds -… - Playlist by Listening Habit
bandcamp.com
noddin0ff.bsky.social
not lying, exactly
pino-fotus.bsky.social
Release the #EpsteinFiles
Reposted by noddin0ff
qjurecic.bsky.social
Same thing happened in LA, same thing happened in DC: prosecutors charged people with assaulting a federal officer and then furiously backpedaled when the evidence didn’t support it
Reposted by noddin0ff
hntdove.bsky.social
Hell of a thing to put next to a statue of Joan of Arc. (h/t David Pilling)
Fire extinguisher next to a statue of Joan of Arc
noddin0ff.bsky.social
This:
bgrueskin.bsky.social
If a federal judge, appointed by Trump, can call him “simply untethered to facts,” our White House press corps can as well.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
In sum, the President is certainly entitled "a great level of deference," Newsom II, 141
F.4th at 1048, in his determination that he "is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws
of the United States." 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3). But "a great level of deference" is not equivalent to
ignoring the facts on the ground. As the Ninth Circuit articulated, courts must "review the
President's determination to ensure that it reflects a colorable assessment of the facts and law
PAGE 22 - OPINION AND ORDER
Case 3:25-cv-01756-IM Document 56
Filed 10/04/25
Page 23 of 31
within a 'range of honest judgment.'" Id. at 1051 (quoting Sterling, 278 U.S. at 399). Here, this
Court concludes that the President did not have a "colorable basis" to invoke § 12406(3) to
federalize the National Guard because the situation on the ground belied an inability of federal
law enforcement officers to execute federal law. Id. at 1051-52. The President's determination
was simply untethered to the facts.
c. Whether there is a Rebellion or Danger of Rebellion
Defendants also aroue that the Sentember 28 2025 federalization order is authorized
Reposted by noddin0ff
nytpitchbot.bsky.social
Don’t blame our leaders if the US military begins committing war crimes or attacking American civilians. Blame the women who laughed at Pete Hegseth during sex.
Reposted by noddin0ff
kenwhite.bsky.social
No prison sentence for criticizing him. Yet.
dbernstein.bsky.social
Oh he can just unilaterally pass unconstitutional laws now huh ok
Reposted by noddin0ff
suziqleathers.bsky.social
General Mattis dropped this Statement today.

Read through to completion below as it is long.

And please Share.
noddin0ff.bsky.social
On the plus side, they have the decency to not mask themselves