Philipp Musfeld
LightNews LightNews
banner
philippmusfeld.bsky.social
Philipp Musfeld
@philippmusfeld.bsky.social
2.2K followers 190 following 81 posts
Postdoctoral researcher in the Cognition Lab at University of Zurich. Interested in working memory, long-term memory, computational modeling, theory development and open science.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
williamngiam.github.io
Thank you to everyone who came to the symposium! I'm also grateful to the people who have chatted to me about my talk on building a formal cognitive model that fits for the latent representation to then link to neural representation similarity.

My talk slides: williamngiam.github.io/talks/2025_A...
November 27, 2025 at 11:58 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
jcgntn.bsky.social
New content: Souza, A. S. (2025). Refreshing Multi-Feature Objects in Visual Working Memory. Journal of Cognition, 8(1): 49, pp. 1–19. DOI: doi.org/10.5334/joc....
#psychscisky
Refreshing Multi-Feature Objects in Visual Working Memory | Journal of Cognition
doi.org
November 25, 2025 at 7:45 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
joschadutli.bsky.social
In our new paper in Psychology and Aging,
@koberauer.bsky.social, @leabartsch.bsky.social, and I investigated age differences in the Hebb repetition effect, and show that chunk formation is largely preserved in old age. Check it out here:

psycnet.apa.org/record/2026-...
APA PsycNet
psycnet.apa.org
November 21, 2025 at 1:47 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
psychonomicsociety.bsky.social
PS is excited to announce the launch of "Individual Differences in Cognition” (IDIC), an open-access journal on research in cognitive psychology, science, and neuroscience. Co-Editors-in-Chief are Andrew R.A. Conway & Michael J. Kane. Manuscripts accepted this spring. More information coming soon!
Andrew R. A. Conway Michael J. Kane
November 22, 2025 at 10:09 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
kordinglab.bsky.social
I think almost all scientific projects should be planned carefully. And I think an app can dramatically improve that. So I wrote an app for that (free for now, if you can fund this let me know). I tested it quite a bit (>8000 users in beta so far). try it: planyourscience.com
November 20, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
singmann.bsky.social
Belated but hopefully still exciting #rstats news: bridgesampling version 1.2-1 has just arrived on CRAN: cran.r-project.org/package=brid...
We now finally provide cmdstanr support (!) plus Monte Carlo Standard Error (MCSE), both thx to Giorgio Micaletto and @avehtari.bsky.social!
bridgesampling: Bridge Sampling for Marginal Likelihoods and Bayes Factors
Provides functions for estimating marginal likelihoods, Bayes factors, posterior model probabilities, and normalizing constants in general, via different versions of bridge sampling (Meng & Wong, ...
cran.r-project.org
November 19, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
timricker.bsky.social
3 Presentations from my lab at Psychonomics this week!

Friday (Nov.21), 3:30-5:30 Working Memory I
Does Reward-Based Prioritization Function
through the Same Mechanisms in Verbal and
Visual Working Memory?
TIMOTHY J. RICKER, University of South Dakota,
JOSHUA SANDRY, Montclair State University
November 17, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
venpopov.bsky.social
The academic publishing system is so rotten, it must be completely dismantled. Not partially, and not improved. Dismantled and rebuilt from the ground up.

When I tell non-academic friends how it all works they stare at me in disbelief. Not only that it exists, but that we still allow it to.
hansonmark.bsky.social Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 16d
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing:

a 🧵 1/n

Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below. 1. The four-fold drain 1.1 Money Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis, which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024 alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher (Elsevier) always over 37%. Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor & Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3 billion in that year. A figure detailing the drain on researcher time. 1. The four-fold drain 1.2 Time The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce, with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure 1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs, grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time. The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many review demands. Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in ‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier, local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision. A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below: 1. The four-fold drain 1.1 Money Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis, which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024 alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher (Elsevier) always over 37%. Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor & Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3 billion in that year. The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
November 12, 2025 at 9:24 AM
philippmusfeld.bsky.social
This is alarming. It’s not only about the struggle an individual researcher has when all his public records suddenly disappear. It’s about trust in a reliable open archival system that we need to continue the rise of open and transparent science. Highly recommended read!
venpopov.bsky.social Ven Popov @venpopov.bsky.social · 20d
A recent redesign of OSF by @cos.io led to widespread access failures. What began as a few broken download links became for me a total disappearance of eight years of DOI-registered work. What happened, how was it resolved, and what it reveals about trust and infrastructure in open science
Open Science needs reliable infrastructure – Ven Popov
After OSF’s October 2025 redesign, I discovered that eight years of DOI-linked preprints and materials were silently hidden by an automated spam flag. What happened, how it was resolved, and what it r...
venpopov.com
November 6, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
venpopov.bsky.social
A recent redesign of OSF by @cos.io led to widespread access failures. What began as a few broken download links became for me a total disappearance of eight years of DOI-registered work. What happened, how was it resolved, and what it reveals about trust and infrastructure in open science
Open Science needs reliable infrastructure – Ven Popov
After OSF’s October 2025 redesign, I discovered that eight years of DOI-linked preprints and materials were silently hidden by an automated spam flag. What happened, how it was resolved, and what it r...
venpopov.com
November 6, 2025 at 6:13 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
martinhebart.bsky.social
Please repost! I am looking for a PhD candidate in the area of Computational Cognitive Neuroscience to start in early 2026.

The position is funded as part of the Excellence Cluster "The Adaptive Mind" at @jlugiessen.bsky.social.

Please apply here until Nov 25:
www.uni-giessen.de/de/ueber-uns...
View from your office onto Giessen and surrounding villages.
November 4, 2025 at 1:57 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
drcpennington.bsky.social
Is anyone else experiencing significant issues (lags, not loading) with OSF (@cos.io) since the interface update?
October 22, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
williamngiam.github.io
What annotations / metadata do you wish was included with every #cogsci dataset (especially #workingmemory folks 👀)? My current list includes the experiment task, stimulus, level of data (trial-, subject-, or group-level), format, and whether analysis code is provided. Any more?
October 6, 2025 at 4:14 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
yonghoonchung.bsky.social
Tomorrow afternoon I'll be presenting my symposium talk at #ESCoP2025 titled "Meaningful and familiar stimuli support visual working memory for simple features"! See you there!
September 2, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
erahyde.bsky.social
Presenting my talk at #ESCOP2025 today at 4pm in the symposium "Cognitive Mastery in Play: From Board to Digital Games as Models of Expertise" in LT2 🎮🎲 Hope you see you there!
September 3, 2025 at 7:38 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
singmann.bsky.social
Exciting #rstats news for Bayesian model comparison: bridgesampling is finally ready to support cmdstanr, see screenshot. Help us by installing the development version of bridgesampling and letting us know if it works for your model(s): pak::pkg_install("quentingronau/bridgesampling#44")
R code and output showing the new functionality: ``` r ## pak::pkg_install("quentingronau/bridgesampling#44") ## see: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bridgesampling/vignettes/bridgesampling_example_stan.html library(bridgesampling) ### generate data ### set.seed(12345) mu <- 0 tau2 <- 0.5 sigma2 <- 1 n <- 20 theta <- rnorm(n, mu, sqrt(tau2)) y <- rnorm(n, theta, sqrt(sigma2)) ### set prior parameters ### mu0 <- 0 tau20 <- 1 alpha <- 1 beta <- 1 stancodeH0 <- 'data { int<lower=1> n; // number of observations vector[n] y; // observations real<lower=0> alpha; real<lower=0> beta; real<lower=0> sigma2; } parameters { real<lower=0> tau2; // group-level variance vector[n] theta; // participant effects } model { target += inv_gamma_lpdf(tau2 | alpha, beta); target += normal_lpdf(theta | 0, sqrt(tau2)); target += normal_lpdf(y | theta, sqrt(sigma2)); } ' tf <- withr::local_tempfile(fileext = ".stan") writeLines(stancodeH0, tf) mod <- cmdstanr::cmdstan_model(tf, quiet = TRUE, force_recompile = TRUE) fitH0 <- mod$sample( data = list(y = y, n = n, alpha = alpha, beta = beta, sigma2 = sigma2), seed = 202, chains = 4, parallel_chains = 4, iter_warmup = 1000, iter_sampling = 50000, refresh = 0 ) #> Running MCMC with 4 parallel chains... #> #> Chain 3 finished in 0.8 seconds. #> Chain 2 finished in 0.8 seconds. #> Chain 4 finished in 0.8 seconds. #> Chain 1 finished in 1.1 seconds. #> #> All 4 chains finished successfully. #> Mean chain execution time: 0.9 seconds. #> Total execution time: 1.2 seconds. H0.bridge <- bridge_sampler(fitH0, silent = TRUE) print(H0.bridge) #> Bridge sampling estimate of the log marginal likelihood: -37.73301 #> Estimate obtained in 8 iteration(s) via method "normal". #### Expected output: ## Bridge sampling estimate of the log marginal likelihood: -37.53183 ## Estimate obtained in 5 iteration(s) via method "normal". ```
September 2, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
carohautekiet.bsky.social
New preprint alert! 🤩 Together with Klaus Oberauer, I wrote a review article on how focused attention in #workingmemory affects long-term memory formation. osf.io/preprints/os...
OSF
osf.io
August 12, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
jcgntn.bsky.social
New content: Rodriguez, A., Musfeld, P., & Bartsch, L. M. (2025). The Flexibility of Working Memory in Drawing on Episodic Long-Term Memory Representations in Serial Recall. Journal of Cognition, 8(1): 40, pp. 1–26. DOI: doi.org/10.5334/joc.... #psychscisky
The Flexibility of Working Memory in Drawing on Episodic Long-Term Memory Representations in Serial Recall | Journal of Cognition
doi.org
August 8, 2025 at 9:47 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
leabartsch.bsky.social
😎Check out this new paper by my brilliant phd student Ana Rodriguez!
Together with @philippmusfeld.bsky.social we investigated how prior knowledge contributes to a serial recall #workingmemory task!
jcgntn.bsky.social Journal of Cognition @jcgntn.bsky.social · Aug 8
New content: Rodriguez, A., Musfeld, P., & Bartsch, L. M. (2025). The Flexibility of Working Memory in Drawing on Episodic Long-Term Memory Representations in Serial Recall. Journal of Cognition, 8(1): 40, pp. 1–26. DOI: doi.org/10.5334/joc.... #psychscisky
The Flexibility of Working Memory in Drawing on Episodic Long-Term Memory Representations in Serial Recall | Journal of Cognition
doi.org
August 8, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
candicemorey.bsky.social
Excellent post-doc opportunity available!
leabartsch.bsky.social Lea Bartsch @leabartsch.bsky.social · Aug 6
🚨 PostDoc Opening 🚨 The lab of Klaus Oberauer is looking for a new postdoc, starting end of this/beginning next year. Research focus is #cognition, #workingmemory, #methods and #computationalmodeling or anything in that direction. I cannot highlight ENOUGH how great it is to work in this lab 🥰🤓
Applications are invited for a Postdoctoral Position (80%) at the Cognitive Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich. The ideal start date would be January 1st, 2026 but could be somewhat earlier or later. The position is for initially 3 years, with possible renewal for another 1.5 years. The successful applicant will work with the head of the Cognitive Psychology Unit, Prof. Dr. Klaus Oberauer, and the Cognitive Psychology team. The post involves research and teaching (one course per semester). Research at the Zurich Cognitive Psychology Unit focuses on capacity limits of cognition, in particular working memory, long-term memory, and attention, which we investigate with experimental, individual-differences and aging studies and computational modeling. For further information see: https://www.psychology.uzh.ch/en/areas/nec/allgpsy.html We offer: - An attractive research environment with close collaboration within the team - Excellent lab infrastructure - Salary according to Cantonal regulations We expect: - a PhD in psychology or a related discipline - experience with experimental research - excellent method knowledge and skills - very good command of English - interest in pursuing an academic career in cognitive psychology In addition, it would be desirable if you had: - experience with publishing in international journals - programming skills - experience with mathematical / computational modeling Please send applications including your CV and motivation letter no later than September 10, 2025 electronically as a single PDF to: Michaela Oestmann, michaela.oestmann@psychologie.uzh.ch For questions about the position please contact Klaus Oberauer, k.oberauer@psychologie.uzh.ch
August 7, 2025 at 10:57 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
leabartsch.bsky.social
🚨 PostDoc Opening 🚨 The lab of Klaus Oberauer is looking for a new postdoc, starting end of this/beginning next year. Research focus is #cognition, #workingmemory, #methods and #computationalmodeling or anything in that direction. I cannot highlight ENOUGH how great it is to work in this lab 🥰🤓
Applications are invited for a Postdoctoral Position (80%) at the Cognitive Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich. The ideal start date would be January 1st, 2026 but could be somewhat earlier or later. The position is for initially 3 years, with possible renewal for another 1.5 years. The successful applicant will work with the head of the Cognitive Psychology Unit, Prof. Dr. Klaus Oberauer, and the Cognitive Psychology team. The post involves research and teaching (one course per semester). Research at the Zurich Cognitive Psychology Unit focuses on capacity limits of cognition, in particular working memory, long-term memory, and attention, which we investigate with experimental, individual-differences and aging studies and computational modeling. For further information see: https://www.psychology.uzh.ch/en/areas/nec/allgpsy.html We offer: - An attractive research environment with close collaboration within the team - Excellent lab infrastructure - Salary according to Cantonal regulations We expect: - a PhD in psychology or a related discipline - experience with experimental research - excellent method knowledge and skills - very good command of English - interest in pursuing an academic career in cognitive psychology In addition, it would be desirable if you had: - experience with publishing in international journals - programming skills - experience with mathematical / computational modeling Please send applications including your CV and motivation letter no later than September 10, 2025 electronically as a single PDF to: Michaela Oestmann, michaela.oestmann@psychologie.uzh.ch For questions about the position please contact Klaus Oberauer, k.oberauer@psychologie.uzh.ch
August 6, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
jcgntn.bsky.social
New content: Bhanap, R., Bartsch, L. M., & Rosner, A. (2025). Tracking Reactivation of Location Information during Memory Strategies: Insights from Eye Movements. Journal of Cognition, 8(1): 38, pp. 1–26. DOI: doi.org/10.5334/joc....
#psychscisky
Tracking Reactivation of Location Information during Memory Strategies: Insights from Eye Movements | Journal of Cognition
doi.org
August 4, 2025 at 10:04 AM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
jsaito25.bsky.social
Now out in JEP:G! We (@fridaprintzlau.bsky.social & @keisukefukuda.bsky.social ) resolve inconsistent attentional protection in WM by addressing discrepancies in cueing. Upshot: Attention changes how perception biases memory, but *not* how memory biases perception!

doi.org/10.1037/xge0...
July 29, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
ruhibhanap.bsky.social
🚨 New paper with @leabartsch.bsky.social and Agnes Rosner! Our results show that location information is similarly reactivated for rehearsal and visual imagery. #workingmemory #eyetracking

Out now in @jcgntn.bsky.social

Read more:
journalofcognition.org/articles/10....
Tracking Reactivation of Location Information during Memory Strategies: Insights from Eye Movements | Journal of Cognition
journalofcognition.org
July 2, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Reposted by Philipp Musfeld
evievergauwe.bsky.social
Postdoc position open in our #workingmemory lab! See here for more info: www.unige.ch/fapse/womcog...
June 30, 2025 at 11:07 AM