banner
ruku9.bsky.social
@ruku9.bsky.social
RN,MBA...proud resident of the best state in the country, MA...lifetime Democrat....no DM's please.
Reposted
⬇️ THIS ⬇️
Pete Hegseth needs to resign or be fired. Now. He’s a walking, talking national security embarrassment.

The disastrous and illegal Venezuela strikes - and his refusal to accept responsibility - should be the last straw.
December 2, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Reposted
Most definitely. And what's more striking to me is the non-foreign agents aiding and abetting this. Congressman and Senators who surely see what is going on but put their own self-interests over the good of the country.
December 6, 2025 at 12:31 PM
Reposted
December 6, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Reposted
President Biden accepted a real award from the LGBTQ+ community yesterday. He was alert, awake, and coherent.

#Pinks #ProudBlue #PresidentBiden #LGBTQ+ImpactAward

youtu.be/iafl_ezibrQ?...
Biden receives LGBTQ+ impact award
YouTube video by LiveNOW from FOX
youtu.be
December 6, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Reposted
What happens next?

Seriously.

Where do we go as a country?

Do we allow this to continue.

Or do we take our country back and stop this.

We have to do something soon.

#SheShed #WarCrimes
December 5, 2025 at 11:02 PM
Reposted
@tedlieu.bsky.social has an honorable #CupOfJoe for members of the US military.
“Those of us who served know that part of the code of conduct is to not lie and accept responsibility. Unfortunately, Secretary Hegseth engaged in dishonorable conduct…He must resign.
December 5, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Reposted
December 5, 2025 at 1:54 PM
Reposted
Yes, the Supreme Court has failed to protect us from Trump. But it’s worse than that: The Supreme Court is imposing its own fascism. It invented presidential immunity. It has gutted the Voting Rights Act, passed by a bipartisan Congress. It’s as bad as Trump, and moving in the same direction.
December 5, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Reposted
There is no reason to be polite or decorous about this any more.

The current Supreme Court is corrupt.

US democracy cannot survive unless it is reformed.
December 5, 2025 at 7:28 PM
Reposted
WaPo is reporting that Bradley told lawmakers that Hegseth DID give a kill order.
December 5, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Reposted
The U.S. Supreme Court: "ICE can racially profile people it arrests."

Also, the U.S. Supreme Court: "Texas can disenfranchise voters based on race."

Can we all agree that we currently have a white supremacist Supreme Court?
December 5, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Reposted
This is amazing.
“Three weeks ago your father killed my brother.”

A Ukrainian journalist confronted Vladimir Putin’s alleged daughter, Yelizaveta Krivonogikh, in Paris.
December 4, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Reposted
What sticks out to me is how absolutely unafraid of prosecution this psychopath is. Part of it is narcissistic personality disorder, but it's mostly the perceived weakness of Democrats. Should they retake power, no one expects Democrats to hold anyone accountable.
December 5, 2025 at 4:09 AM
Reposted
Simply amazing that the Supreme Court declared an end to legal race discrimination in the affirmative action case two years ago and now allows overt racism in both immigration arrests and redistricting.

Using race to help minorities? Bad. Using it to discriminate against them? Very, very good.
BREAKING: Supreme Court GRANTS Texas request to restore redistricting maps

apparent 6-3 ruling with the liberals in dissent @courthousenews.bsky.social
December 4, 2025 at 11:52 PM
Reposted
Agree with this thread. Worth reading in full.

25 years ago John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and AC Barrett all worked on GWBush's 2000 Florida recount team. What they're doing now is, if anything, more nakedly partisan.

Fire-breathing dissent by Kagan, with Sotomayor and Jackson.
They're not even trying to appear nonpartisan anymore.
#BREAKING: Over dissents from the three democratic appointees, #SCOTUS puts Texas's new House maps back into effect for (and, presumably, through) the 2026 midterms.

The three Democratic appointees, in an opinion by Justice Kagan, dissent.

I'll post the ruling shortly.
December 4, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Reposted
As Justice Kagan begins her dissent by pointing out, what is even the point of trial, of fact-finding, of clear error, of standards of review, when the Supreme Court simply ignores every single part of that and decides everything purely on the papers without any real consideration of the facts?
December 4, 2025 at 11:08 PM
Reposted
It's not just liberal judges they're doing this to. They're doing this to plenty of conservative judges too; judges who actually spent weeks and weeks poring over the details and with their arms deep in the guts of thousands of pages of documents and days of testimony.

Those judges are pissed.
December 4, 2025 at 11:12 PM
Reposted
Absolutely agree. Honestly I was kinda sad the appellate court wasn’t going to let the gop learn their lesson.

This is certainly contemptuous of the law. SCOTUS reform is now required as part of the dem 2028 platform.
December 5, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Reposted
It's good—very good, and very important—that district courts keep issuing these 100-page rulings upholding the law. It must be incredibly dispiriting to see them overturned in a two-page, lawless, unsigned order, but please, keep them coming. They expose SCOTUS' corruption like nothing else.
December 5, 2025 at 12:41 AM
Reposted
At least one other boat, the one with the Colombian fisherman, was adrift and displaying a distress signal with its engine out of the water. To attack a disabled vessel in distress and signaling for assistance is basically in the same category as killing shipwrecked survivors clinging to wreckage.
December 4, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Reposted
🖕🏼 heritage
December 4, 2025 at 1:47 PM
Reposted
December 4, 2025 at 12:35 PM
Reposted
The New York Times sued the Pentagon on Thursday, arguing that the Defense Department infringed on the constitutional rights of its journalists by imposing a set of new restrictions on reporting about the military.

Read more: nyti.ms/44CRJZY
December 4, 2025 at 11:15 AM
Reposted
I spoke to the New York Times in this great explainer piece by Charlie Savage

www.nytimes.com/2025/12/04/u...
December 4, 2025 at 1:50 PM
Reposted
The New York Times sued the Pentagon on Thursday, arguing that the Defense Department infringed on the constitutional rights of its journalists by imposing a set of new restrictions on reporting about the military. - per NYT 📰
December 4, 2025 at 12:40 PM